Cover Image
市場調查報告書

全球煉油廠整備的動向

Q3 2017 Global Refinery Maintenance Review - Hurricane Harvey Causes High Unplanned Maintenance in the US

出版商 GlobalData 商品編碼 595487
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 54 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
全球煉油廠整備的動向 Q3 2017 Global Refinery Maintenance Review - Hurricane Harvey Causes High Unplanned Maintenance in the US
出版日期: 2017年12月01日 內容資訊: 英文 54 Pages
簡介

本報告提供全球各國的近來的煉油廠整備/停止營運議案的動向 (以季度為基礎) 相關分析,全球整體的發生數量、規模,及前一年同時期的比較,各地區、美國國內的各區域 (PADD:Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts) 、各業者詳細趨勢等調查。

第1章 目錄

第2章 全球煉油廠的整備趨勢 (以季度為基礎)

  • 概況
  • 代表性停止營運議案:與前一年同時期的比較
  • 全球各地的整頓現狀:概要
  • 突發性的整備議案的原因:與前一年同時期的比較
  • 計劃的煉油廠整備議案預測:全球整體
  • 各地區的整備議案
    • 整備中的煉油廠的數量:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
    • 整備中的石油焦生產設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
    • 整備中的FCC (流體化媒裂) 設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
    • 整備中的加氫裂解設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
    • 整備中的加氫處理設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
    • 整備中的改性設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各地區
  • 美國國內的整備議案:各PADD
    • 整備中的煉油廠的數量:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
    • 整備中的石油焦生產設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
    • 整備中的FCC (流體化媒裂) 設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
    • 整備中的加氫裂解設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
    • 整備中的加氫處理設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
    • 整備中的改性設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各PADD
  • 各業者的整備議案
    • 整備中的煉油廠的數量:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者
    • 整備中的石油焦生產設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者
    • 整備中的FCC (流體化媒裂) 設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者
    • 整備中的加氫裂解設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者
    • 整備中的加氫處理設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者
    • 整備中的改性設備:與前一年同時期的比較,各業者

第3章 附錄

目錄
Product Code: GDGE0211MAR

In Q3 2017, the US had the highest refining capacity under maintenance (in both planned and unplanned) among countries with almost 5 mmbd capacity under maintenance. The country had a very high unplanned capacity of 4.5 mmbd under maintenance due to Hurricane Harvey. Apart from the US, Russia and India witnessed highest refining capacity under planned maintenance, while Russia and Mexico lead in terms of unplanned maintenance. Main reasons for unplanned maintenance globally were floods and storm. Other factors include fire and explosion, earthquake, leakages.

Scope

  • Analysis of capacity under maintenance for crude distillation, coking, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracker, hydrotreater and reformer units
  • Comparison of select refinery units under maintenance (planned, unplanned and both) by major regions for Q3 2017 and Q3 2016
  • Comparison of select refinery units under maintenance (planned, unplanned and both) by PADD regions in the US for both the quarters
  • Comparison of select refinery units under maintenance (planned, unplanned and both) by operators for both the quarters
  • Comparison of factors responsible for unplanned maintenance globally by region for Q3 2017 and Q3 2016

Reasons to buy

  • Keep abreast of major refinery units (crude distillation, coking, fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracker, hydrotreater and reformer) undergoing maintenance globally
  • Obtain information on region-wise maintenance globally for Q3 2017 in comparison with Q3 2016
  • Identify and compare PADD regions and operators with highest maintenance in both the quarters
  • Facilitate decision making on the basis of strong refinery maintenance data
  • Assess your competitor's refinery maintenance data

Table of Contents

1. Table of Contents

  • 1.1. List of Tables
  • 1.2. List of Figures

2. Q3 2017 Global Refinery Maintenance Review

  • 2.1. Key Highlights
  • 2.2. Major Outages in Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • 2.3. Regional Maintenance Briefs
  • 2.4. FactorsResponsible for Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • 2.5. Global Refining Capacity Outlook under Planned Maintenance
  • 2.6. Maintenance by Region
    • 2.6.1. Global Refining Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.6.2. Global Coking Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.6.3. Global Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.6.4. Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.6.5. Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.6.6. Global Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • 2.7. Maintenance by Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts (PADD) Regions in the US
    • 2.7.1. Refining Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.7.2. Coking Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.7.3. FCC Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.7.4. Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.7.5. Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.7.6. Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • 2.8. Maintenance by Operator
    • 2.8.1. Global Refining Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.8.2. Global Coking Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.8.3. Global FCC Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.8.4. Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.8.5. Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
    • 2.8.6. Global Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016

3. Appendix

  • 3.1. Abbreviations
  • 3.2. Methodology
    • 3.2.1. Coverage
    • 3.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 3.3. Contact Us
  • 3.4. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Global Refining Capacity Outlook under Planned Maintenance
  • Table 2: Global Refining Capacity Outlook under Planned Maintenance (Contd.1)

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in North America
  • Figure 2: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in South America
  • Figure 3: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in Asia
  • Figure 4: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in Europe
  • Figure 5: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in the Middle East
  • Figure 6: Factors Responsible for Unplanned Maintenance in the Former Soviet Union*
  • Figure 7: Global Refining Capacity Outlook under Planned Maintenance by Region (mbd)
  • Figure 8: Global Refining Capacity Outlook under Planned Maintenance by Operator (mbd)
  • Figure 9: Global Refining Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*^#
  • Figure 10: Global Refining Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 11: Global Refining Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 12: Global Coking Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 13: Global Coking Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 14: Global Coking Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 15: Global FCC Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 16: Global FCC Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 17: Global FCC Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 18: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 19: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 20: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 21: Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 22: Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 23: Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 24: Global Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 25: Global Reformer Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 26: Global Reformer Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Region, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 27: Refining Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*^#
  • Figure 28: Refining Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 29: Refining Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 30: Coking Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 31: Coking Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 32: Coking Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 33: FCC Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 34: FCC Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 35: FCC Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 36: Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*^
  • Figure 37: Hydrocracker Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 38: Hydrocracker Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 39: Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 40: Hydrotreater Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 41: Hydrotreater Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 42: Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 43: Reformer Capacity under Planned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 44: Reformer Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by PADD Regions in the US, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 45: Global Refining Capacity under Maintenance by Key Operators, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 46: Global Refining Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 47: Global Refining Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 48: Global Coking Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 49: Global Coking Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 50: Global Coking Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 51: Global FCC Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 52: Global FCC Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 53: Global FCC Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 54: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 55: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Planned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 56: Global Hydrocracker Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 57: Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 58: Global Hydrotreater Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
  • Figure 59: Global Reformer Capacity under Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016*
  • Figure 60: Global Reformer Capacity under Unplanned Maintenance by Operator, Q3 2017 vis-a-vis Q3 2016
Back to Top