Cover Image
市場調查報告書

北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業:財務、經營基本分析和基準

Top 20 North America Independent Exploration and Production Companies - Financial and Operational Fundamental Analysis and Benchmarking, 2015

出版商 GlobalData 商品編碼 347874
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 374 Pages
訂單完成後即時交付
價格
Back to Top
北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業:財務、經營基本分析和基準 Top 20 North America Independent Exploration and Production Companies - Financial and Operational Fundamental Analysis and Benchmarking, 2015
出版日期: 2015年12月01日 內容資訊: 英文 374 Pages
簡介

本報告提供北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業調查分析,以經營、財務實際成果的綜合資訊為焦點,提供過去5年的經營、財務參數、石油&天然氣的蘊藏量、生產量、成本支出、擁有面積與坑井、經營指標、經營成績、財務指標等系統性資訊。

第1章 目錄

第2章 基準手法

第3章 北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業:綜合批點

第4章 北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業:經營實際成果

  • 蘊藏量指標
  • 生產量指標
  • 成本支出指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第5章 北美的獨立型E&P企業前20大企業:財務實際成果

  • 財務指標

第6章 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第7章 Antero Resources Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第8章 Apache Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第9章 Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第10章 Canadian Natural Resources Limited:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第11章 Chesapeake Energy Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第12章 ConocoPhillips:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第13章 Consol Energy:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第14章 德國馬牌:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第15章 Devon Energy Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第16章 Encana Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第17章 EOG:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第18章 EQT:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第19章 Hess Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第20章 Linn Energy, LLC:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第21章 Marathon Oil Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第22章 Noble Energy, Inc.:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第23章 Occidental Petroleum Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第24章 Range Resources Corporation:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第25章 Southwestern Energy Company:經營統計

  • 綜合評估
  • 蘊藏量、生產量指標
  • 成本支出、石油&天然氣經營指標
  • 石油&天然氣經營成績指標
  • 擁有面積、坑井指標

第26章 附錄

圖表

目錄
Product Code: GDGE0023B

"Top 20 North America Independent Exploration and Production Companies - Financial and Operational Fundamental Analysis and Benchmarking, 2015" is the latest report from GlobalData, the industry analysis specialists, that offers comprehensive information on the operational and financial performance of top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Development (E&P) Companies. The report benchmarks and analyzes top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Production Companies on various operational and financial parameters. The report is an essential source for key operational data, analysis and strategic insights into companies. It provides detailed information on the key operational and financial parameters for the last five years. It also highlights the top ranked company on various operational and financial parameters such as proved oil and gas reserves, production, costs incurred, acreage & wells, performance metrics, results of oil and gas operations and financial metrics.

Proved oil and gas Reserves of the top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Development (E&P) Companies increased in 2014, up from 39.77 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe) in 2010 to 47.92 billion boe in 2014. ConocoPhillips had the highest proved oil and gas reserves of 8,906 mmboe among the Top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Production (E&P) Companies. The company's proved reserves decreased at a rate of 0.17% from 8,921 mmboe in 2013 to 8,906 mmboe in 2014.

Scope

The report provides in-depth analysis and insights into companies' capital spending, revenues, oil and gas reserves, production, and performance measures. Its scope includes -

  • Detailed and unique insights information on the key operational and financial parameters. The report provides a comprehensive overview of production, production change, production growth, reserves, reserve changes, reserve growth, capital expenditures, performance metrics, financial metrics and results of oil and gas operations.
  • Provides annual information on key operational and financial parameters for the period 2010 to 2014.
  • Benchmarks North America Independent (E&P) companies on operational and financial parameters.
  • Companies covered include; Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Antero Resources Corporation, Apache Corporation, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Canadian Natural Resources Limited, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Consol Energy Inc., Continental Resources, Inc., Devon Energy Corporation, EnCana Corporation, EOG Resources, Inc., EQT Corporation, Hess Corporation, Linn Energy, LLC, Marathon Oil Corporation, Noble Energy, Inc., Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Range Resources Corporation, Southwestern Energy Company.
  • The top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Development (E&P) Companies: Financial & Operational Fundamental Analysis and Benchmarking report is based on Company Annual Report, publicly available data filed with the U S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other similar agencies worldwide. This has then been analyzed by GlobalData's in house team of experts.

Reasons to buy

The report will enhance your decision making capability in a more rapid and time sensitive manner. It will allow you to -

  • Rank your performance against other top 20 North America Independent Exploration & Development (E&P) Companies using operational and financial benchmarking metrics
  • Identify M&A targets from up-to-date information and in-depth analysis on financial and operational parameters of your competitors.
  • Formulate your strategies based on in-depth analysis of your competitors in oil and gas markets.
  • Improve decision making on the basis of peer comparison.
  • Exploit the strengths and weakness of your closest competitors by comparing and analyzing their financial and operational parameters.

Table of Contents

1. Table of Contents

  • 1.1. List of Tables
  • 1.2. List of Figures

2. Benchmarking Methodology

  • 2.1. Company Assessment Parameters

3. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Overall Scores

4. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance

  • 4.1. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance: Reserves Metrics
  • 4.2. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance: Production Metrics
  • 4.3. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance: Costs Incurred Metrics
  • 4.4. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance: Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics
  • 4.5. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Operational Performance: Acreage and Wells Metrics

5. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Financial Performance

  • 5.1. Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Financial Performance: Financial Metrics

6. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 6.1. Anadarko, Overall Rating
  • 6.2. Anadarko, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 6.3. Anadarko, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 6.4. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 6.5. Anadarko, Acreage and Well Metrics, 2010-2014

7. Antero Resources Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 7.1. Antero, Overall Rating
  • 7.2. Antero, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 7.3. Antero, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 7.4. Antero, Results of Oil and Gas Operations, 2010-2014
  • 7.5. Antero, Acreage and Wells, 2010-2014

8. Apache Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 8.1. Apache, Overall Rating
  • 8.2. Apache, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 8.3. Apache, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations, 2010-2014
  • 8.4. Apache, Results of Oil and Gas Operations, 2010-2014
  • 8.5. Apache, Acreage and Wells, 2010-2014

9. Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 9.1. Cabot, Overall Rating
  • 9.2. Cabot, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 9.3. Cabot, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 9.4. Cabot, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 9.5. Cabot, Acreage and Wells, 2010-2014

10. Canadian Natural Resources Limited, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 10.1. CNRL, Overall Rating
  • 10.2. CNRL, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 10.3. CNRL, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 10.4. CNRL, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 10.5. CNRL, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

11. Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 11.1. Chesapeake, Overall Rating
  • 11.2. Chesapeake, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 11.3. Chesapeake, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 11.4. Chesapeake, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 11.5. Chesapeake, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

12. ConocoPhillips, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 12.1. ConocoPhillips, Overall Rating
  • 12.2. ConocoPhillips, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 12.3. ConocoPhillips, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 12.4. ConocoPhillips, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 12.5. ConocoPhillips, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

13. Consol Energy, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 13.1. Consol, Overall Rating
  • 13.2. Consol, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 13.3. Consol, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 13.4. Consol, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 13.5. Consol, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

14. Continental, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 14.1. Continental, Overall Rating
  • 14.2. Continental, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 14.3. Continental, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 14.4. Continental, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 14.5. Continental, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

15. Devon Energy Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 15.1. Devon, Overall Rating
  • 15.2. Devon, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 15.3. Devon, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 15.4. Devon, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 15.5. Devon, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

16. Encana Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 16.1. Encana, Overall Rating
  • 16.2. Encana, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 16.3. Encana, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 16.4. Encana, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 16.5. Encana, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

17. EOG, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 17.1. EOG, Overall Rating
  • 17.2. EOG, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 17.3. EOG, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 17.4. EOG, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 17.5. EOG, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

18. EQT, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 18.1. EQT, Overall Rating
  • 18.2. EQT, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 18.3. EQT, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 18.4. EQT, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 18.5. EQT, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

19. Hess Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 19.1. Hess, Overall Rating
  • 19.2. Hess, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 19.3. Hess, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 19.4. Hess, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 19.5. Hess, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

20. Linn Energy, LLC, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 20.1. Linn, Overall Rating
  • 20.2. Linn, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 20.3. Linn, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 20.4. Linn, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 20.5. Linn, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

21. Marathon Oil Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 21.1. Marathon, Overall Rating
  • 21.2. Marathon, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 21.3. Marathon, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 21.4. Marathon, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 21.5. Marathon, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

22. Noble Energy, Inc., Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 22.1. Noble, Overall Rating
  • 22.2. Noble, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 22.3. Noble, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 22.4. Noble, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 22.5. Noble, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

23. Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 23.1. Occidental, Overall Rating
  • 23.2. Occidental, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 23.3. Occidental, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 23.4. Occidental, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 23.5. Occidental, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

24. Range Resources Corporation, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 24.1. Range, Overall Rating
  • 24.2. Range, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 24.3. Range, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 24.4. Range, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 24.5. Range, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

25. Southwestern Energy Company, Operational Statistics, 2010-2014

  • 25.1. Southwestern, Overall Rating
  • 25.2. Southwestern, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 25.3. Southwestern, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 25.4. Southwestern, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • 25.5. Southwestern, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014

26. Appendix

  • 26.1. Abbreviations
  • 26.2. Sources
  • 26.3. Coverage
  • 26.4. Methodology
  • 26.5. Primary Research
  • 26.6. Secondary Research
  • 26.7. Data Sources
  • 26.8. Expert Panel Validation
  • 26.9. Definition
  • 26.10. Total Oil and Gas Reserves
  • 26.11. Reserve Life
  • 26.12. Total Oil and Gas Production
  • 26.13. Reserve Replacement Ratio
  • 26.14. Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations
  • 26.15. Results of Oil and Gas Operations
  • 26.16. Results of Oil and Gas Operations per Oil and Gas Produced
  • 26.17. Disclaimer

List of Tables

  • Table 1: Top 20 Independent E&P Companies, Total Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (mmboe), 2014
  • Table 2: Operational Performance, Weighted Score and Rank, 2014
  • Table 3: Operational Performance Comparison: Reserves Metrics
  • Table 4: Operational Performance Comparison: Production Metrics
  • Table 5: Operational Performance Comparison: Costs Incurred Metrics
  • Table 6: Operational Performance Comparison: Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics
  • Table 7: Operational Performance Comparison: Acreage and Wells Metrics
  • Table 8: Financial Performance Parameters
  • Table 9: Financial Performance Weighted Score and Rank, 2014
  • Table 10: Operational Performance Weighted Score and Rank, 2014
  • Table 11: Financial Performance Weighted Score and Rank, 2014
  • Table 12: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 13: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil Reserves as Share of Total Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 14: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Reserve Life Index (Years), 2010-2014
  • Table 15: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Reserves Growth (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 16: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Reserve Replacement Ratio (Including Sales) (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 17: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil Production (mmbbl), 2010-2014
  • Table 18: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Gas Production (bcf), 2010-2014
  • Table 19: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Oil and Gas Production (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 20: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil as Share of Total Oil and Gas Production (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 21: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Oil and Gas Production Growth (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 22: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Reserve Replacement Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 23: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas F&D Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 24: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Finding Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 25: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Acquisition Cost (US$ mil), 2010-2014
  • Table 26: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Costs Incurred from Upstream Oil and Gas Operations (US$ mil), 2010-2014
  • Table 27: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Revenue (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 28: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Lifting Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 29: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net-Back per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 30: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Recycle Ratio, Three-Year Average (x), 2010-2014
  • Table 31: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 32: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Exploration Drilling Success Ratio (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 33: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Productive Oil and Gas Wells, 2010-2014
  • Table 34: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net/Gross Oil and Gas Ratio (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 35: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Exploratory and Development Wells Drilled, 2010-2014
  • Table 36: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Undeveloped Acreage as Share of Total Net Developed and Undeveloped Acreage (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 37: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Operating Revenue (US$ mil), 2010-2014
  • Table 38: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income (US$ mil), 2010-2014
  • Table 39: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, EV/Reserves (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 40: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, EV/DACF Multiple (x), 2010-2014
  • Table 41: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Debt-to-Equity Ratio (x), 2010-2014
  • Table 42: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Discretionary Cash Flow per Share (US$/Share), 2010-2014
  • Table 43: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income Margin (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 44: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Return on Average Equity (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 45: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Production per Thousand Shares (boe/thousand shares), 2010-2014
  • Table 46: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Capex/Cash Flow (x), 2010-2014
  • Table 47: Anadarko, Oil and Gas Reserves Metrics (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 48: Anadarko, Oil Reserves Metrics (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 49: Anadarko, Gas Reserves Metrics (bcf), 2010-2014
  • Table 50: Anadarko, Oil and Gas Production (Sales Volume) Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Table 51: Anadarko, Oil and Gas Production (Reserves Reconciliation) Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Table 52: Anadarko, Reserve Replacement Ratio Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Table 53: Anadarko, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$ mil), 2010-2014
  • Table 54: Anadarko, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 55: Anadarko, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Table 56: Anadarko, Acreage Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Table 57: Anadarko, Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Table 58: Antero, Oil and Gas Reserves Metrics (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 59: Antero, Oil Reserves Metrics (mmboe), 2010-2014
  • Table 60: Antero, Gas Reserves Metrics (bcf), 2010-2014
  • Table 61: Antero, Oil and Gas Production (Sales Volume) Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Table 62: Antero, Oil and Gas Production (Reserves Reconciliation) Metrics, 2010-2014

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Overall Score Comparison, 2014
  • Figure 2: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (mmboe), 2014
  • Figure 3: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil Reserves as Share of Total Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (%), 2014
  • Figure 4: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Reserve Life Index (Years), 2014
  • Figure 5: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Reserves Growth (%), 2014
  • Figure 6: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Reserve Replacement Ratio Including Sales (%), 2014
  • Figure 7: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil Production (mmbbl), 2014
  • Figure 8: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Gas Production (bcf), 2014
  • Figure 9: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Oil and Gas Production (mmboe), 2014
  • Figure 10: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil as Share of Total Oil and Gas Production (%), 2014
  • Figure 11: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Oil and Gas Production Growth (%), 2014
  • Figure 12: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Reserve Replacement Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 13: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas F&D Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 14: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Finding Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 15: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Acquisition Cost (US$ mil), 2014
  • Figure 16: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Costs Incurred from Upstream Oil and Gas Operations (US$ mil), 2014
  • Figure 17: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Oil and Gas Revenue per boe (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 18: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Lifting Cost per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 19: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net-Back per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 20: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Recycle Ratio, Three-Year Average (x), 2014
  • Figure 21: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income per boe, Three-Year Average (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 22: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Exploration Drilling Success Ratio (%), 2014
  • Figure 23: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Productive Oil and Gas Wells, 2014
  • Figure 24: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net/Gross Oil and Gas Ratio (%), 2014
  • Figure 25: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Productive Exploratory and Development Wells Drilled, 2014
  • Figure 26: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Undeveloped Acreage as Share of Total Net Developed and Undeveloped Acreage (%), 2014
  • Figure 27: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Total Operating Revenue (US$ mil), 2014
  • Figure 28: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income (US$ mil), 2014
  • Figure 29: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, EV/Proved Reserves (US$/boe), 2014
  • Figure 30: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, EV/DACF Multiple (x), 2014
  • Figure 31: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Debt-to-Equity Ratio (x), 2014
  • Figure 32: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Discretionary Cash Flow per Share (US$/Share), 2014
  • Figure 33: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Net Income Margin (%), 2014
  • Figure 34: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Return on Average Equity (%), 2014
  • Figure 35: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Production per Thousand Shares (boe/thousand shares), 2014
  • Figure 36: Top 20 North America Independent E&P Companies, Capex/Cash Flow (x), 2014
  • Figure 37: Anadarko, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 38: Anadarko, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 39: Anadarko, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales, 2010-2014
  • Figure 40: Anadarko, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 41: Anadarko, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 42: Anadarko, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 43: Antero, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 44: Antero, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 45: Antero, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales, 2010-2014
  • Figure 46: Antero, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 47: Antero, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 48: Antero, Acreage Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 49: Apache, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 50: Apache, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 51: Apache, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 52: Apache, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 53: Apache, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 54: Apache, Acreage and Wells, 2010-2014
  • Figure 55: Cabot, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 56: Cabot, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 57: Cabot, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 58: Cabot, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 59: Cabot, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 60: Cabot, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 61: CNRL, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 62: CNRL, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 63: CNRL, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 64: CNRL, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 65: CNRL, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 66: CNRL, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 67: Chesapeake, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 68: Chesapeake, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 69: Chesapeake, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 70: Chesapeake, Costs Incurred In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 71: Chesapeake, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 72: Chesapeake, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 73: ConocoPhillips, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 74: ConocoPhillips, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 75: ConocoPhillips, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 76: ConocoPhillips, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 77: ConocoPhillips, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 78: ConocoPhillips, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 79: Consol, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 80: Consol, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 81: Consol, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 82: Consol, Costs Incurred, In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 83: Consol, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 84: Consol, Acreage Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 85: Continental, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 86: Continental, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 87: Continental, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 88: Continental, Costs Incurred, In Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 89: Continental, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 90: Continental, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 91: Devon, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 92: Devon, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 93: Devon, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 94: Devon, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 95: Devon, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 96: Devon, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 97: Encana, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 98: Encana, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 99: Encana, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 100: Encana, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 101: Encana, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 102: Encana, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 103: EOG, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 104: EOG, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 105: EOG, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 106: EOG, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 107: EOG, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 108: EOG, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 109: EQT, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 110: EQT, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 111: EQT, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 112: EQT, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 113: EQT, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 114: EQT, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 115: Hess, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 116: Hess, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 117: Hess, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 118: Hess, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 119: Hess, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 120: Hess, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 121: Linn, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 122: Linn, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 123: Linn, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 124: Linn, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 125: Linn, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 126: Linn, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 127: Marathon, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 128: Marathon, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 129: Marathon, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 130: Marathon, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 131: Marathon, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 132: Marathon, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 133: Noble, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 134: Noble, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 135: Noble, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales (%), Metrics 2010-2014
  • Figure 136: Noble, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 137: Noble, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 138: Noble, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 139: Occidental, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 140: Occidental, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 141: Occidental, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 142: Occidental, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 143: Occidental, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 144: Occidental, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 145: Range, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 146: Range, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 147: Range, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%), 2010-2014
  • Figure 148: Range, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 149: Range, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 150: Range, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 151: Southwestern, Overall Rank and Scores, 2014
  • Figure 152: Southwestern, Reserves and Production Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 153: Southwestern, Reserve Replacement Ratio Excluding Sales Metrics (%),2010-2014
  • Figure 154: Southwestern, Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Operations Metrics, 2010-2014
  • Figure 155: Southwestern, Results of Oil and Gas Operations Metrics (US$/boe), 2010-2014
  • Figure 156: Southwestern, Acreage and Wells Metrics, 2010-2014
Back to Top