首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 州的活動對美國藥品產業產生的影響
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4495)
肥胖症治療 (48)
非專利藥 (117)
疫苗 (168)
神經疾病 (175)
骨頭疾病治療 (41)
動物用醫藥 (18)
處方藥 (89)
規章 (107)
感染疾病 (318)
精神病 (80)
製藥企業 (506)
糖尿病 (157)
癌症 (838)
藥物開發 (1275)
DDS (173)
OTC 非處方藥 (147)
市場調查報告書

州的活動對美國藥品產業產生的影響

State Activities: Impact on the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry

出版商 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日期 2007年06月 商品編碼 53075
內容資訊 英文 35 pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年12月21日停止出版。

簡介

2005年美國2兆美元的醫療費中有17%是由州政府及地方政府支付。其中包含了超過217億美元的處方箋藥。未來10年當中該費用預計將成長為兩倍。

本報告書內容包括:州法令的動向、藥價及償付、幹細胞等研究動向、2007年各州的法令、各州計畫、處方資料保護動向、採用電子病歷、州對製藥公司的訴訟内容等。內容綱要摘記如下:

實施概要

針對嚴重藥品問題的州法令

  • 2007年的州法案

促進藥品重新進口的北部各州

  • 催生政治策略的「毒藥丸」
  • 政治家、遊說者、患者
  • 逼近的總統大選、議會選舉的影響

與連線確定開立處方者處方資料相關的計畫

  • New Hampshire的Prescription Information Law
  • AMA National Prescrribing Data Restriction Program

電子病歷:相互作用、透明度、説明責任

  • 國家醫療資訊網
  • 州對電子醫療的配合行動

不怕訴訟的檢察官

  • 州執行反獨佔法
  • 操作平均批發價格及州的訴訟

醫生的教育:根據證據的醫療及Counter-Detailing 

  • 賓州的PACE計畫
  • 藥品功能回顧計畫
  • 處方計畫

州在財政上支援對藥品產業有貢獻的研究

  • 透過州的生命科學研究主導權的經濟發展
  • 幹細胞研究主導行動

接受適當醫療的管道

  • 州的針對兒童健康保險計畫
  • 州的藥品支援計畫
  • 州的非專利藥品促進計畫
  • 業界援助

人類乳突病毒相關法令

  • 只是一種癌症治療藥還是首度出現的疫苗
  • 對製藥公司而言的新課題

州支援的全民保險制度

  • 州在全民保險制度中握有主導權
  • 企業採取的全民保險制度改革嘗試

未來動向

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Introduction

In 2005, 17% of the nation' s $2 trillion in health care costs was paid by state and local governments, including more than $21.7 billion for prescription drugs; these costs are expected to double over the next ten years. Determined to protect state budgets without cutting essential health care services, state legislatures are enacting laws intended to lower drug costs by regulating the health care and prescription drug industries.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy

As drug costs continue to rise, state legislatures become increasingly proactive, enacting legislation intended to contain costs and to create new kinds of local health care initiatives-and taking legal action against pharmaceutical companies over issues of drug pricing and safety. Can pharmaceutical companies turn this situation around? How can companies adjust their marketing strategies to the requirements of increasingly vigilant national and state governments? In the current environment of distrust, are there opportunities for companies to build mutually benefi cially relationships with the states? In the proliferation of state initiatives in many areas of health care, are there any that may benefi t pharmaceutical companies?

Scope

  • Issues addressed by state legislatures: drug pricing, drug reimportation, patient/prescriber privacy, electronic medical records, stem cell funding, life sciences research, HPV vaccination, universal health care
  • 2007 state legislation: most active states, bills fi led, most frequently targeted pharmaceutical-related issues
  • Programs initiated by states: evidence-based medicine initiatives, Pennsylvania PACE Program, Oregonbased Drug Effectiveness Review Project, the Prescription Project, child health insurance programs, drug purchase assistance, state-funded life sciences research initiatives
  • Prescription data protection: New Hampshire prescription information law, AMA prescribing data restriction program
  • Electronic health records: State Alliance for e-health, individual state initiatives, National Health Information Network
  • State legal actions against pharmaceutical companies: companies targeted, plaintiff states, nature of complaints, settlements awarded

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • State Legislatures Taking Action Against Serious Drug Concerns
    • 2007 State Legislative Bills
  • Northern States Push for Drug Reimportation
    • Political Maneuverings Create “Poison Pills”
    • Vested Interests: Politicians, Lobbyists, and Patients
    • Effects of Looming Presidential and Congressional Elections
  • Battle Lines Drawn Over Access to Prescriber-Identifi able Prescription Data
    • New Hampshire' s Prescription Information Law
    • AMA National Prescribing Data Restriction Program
  • Electronic Health Records-Interoperability, Transparency, and Accountability for All
    • National Health Information Network
    • State Alliance for e-Health
  • State Attorneys General Not Afraid to Litigate
    • State Antitrust Enforcement
    • Average Wholesale Price Manipulations and State Litigation
  • Educating Physicians: Evidence-Based Medicine and Counter-Detailing
    • Pennsylvania' s PACE Program
    • The Drug Effectiveness Review Project
    • The Prescription Project
  • States Are Funding Research That Benefi ts the Pharma Industry
    • Economic Development Through State Life Sciences Initiatives
    • Stem Cell Funding Initiatives
  • Access to Affordable Medicines
    • State Children' s Health Insurance Program
    • State Pharmaceutical Assistance Programs
    • States Push for Generics
    • Industry' s Helping Hand
  • Mandatory Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Legislation
    • Just Another Cancer Drug or First-Ever Vaccine?
    • A New Challenge for Pharmaceutical Companies
  • State-Sponsored Universal Health Care
    • States Taking the Lead on Universal Health Care
    • Businesses Attempt Health Care Reform
  • Capturing the Future

Figures

  • 1. Factors Contributing to Total Prescription Drug Spending Growth, 1988-2016
  • 2. United States Expenditures on Prescription Drugs, 2000, 2005, and 2016
  • 3. Prescription Drug State Legislation, 2007
  • 4. Drug Reimportation Timeline: Politics, Patients' Rights, and Pharmaceutical Industry Lobbying
  • 5. Timeline of Select Stem Cell Research Activities in Different States, 2000-2007
  • 6. SCHIP Funds: Allocation Versus Spending, 1998-2007
  • 7. State Pharmaceutical Assistance Programs, 2006
  • 8. Health Insurance Premiums, Percentage Increase, 1996-2006
  • 9. Status of State Initiatives for Health Care Reform

Sidebars

  • New Hampshire House Bill 1346-An Act requiring certain persons to keep the contents of prescriptions confi dential (excerpt)
  • Human Papillomavirus, Cancer, and Sexually Transmitted Disease

Tables

  • 1. State e-Health Initiatives-Channels for Creating Health Information Technology Networks, 2007
  • 2. States Take Legal Action Against Pharmaceutical Companies
  • 3. Relative Advantages of Life Sciences Clusters in Three States, 2002
  • Appendix-State Drug Assistance Programs, 2007
Back to Top