|
市場調查報告書
為了與學名藥競爭的實用防衛戰略
Practical Defense Strategies for Combating Generics Competition
|
本報告已在2011年12月21日停止出版。
專門於醫療業界進行廣泛調查的美國調查公司 Decision Resources Inc. (總公司:Massachusetts state)針對為了與學名藥競爭的實用防衛戰略進行調查分析,並有系統地出版綜合報告書 "Practical Defense Strategies for Combating Generics Competition" 。
此報告書除了調查在美國、歐洲及日本的學名藥投入動向與防衛戰略的重要性之外,內容還包括企業的防衛戰略、製品的防衛戰略概略與其種種動向、以及對於有專利認證學名藥的威脅之今後的展望等。報告書之內容摘要如下所示。
摘要
防衛戰略的重要性
製藥公司動向
戰略概要
- 企業戰略
- 合併
- 對生物科技研究開發的投資
- 增進生產力以及由於委託研究而降低的風險
- 學名藥製造業者的收購
- 製品戰略
- 專利的追加
- 新的異性體還有鏡像體
- 開放協調與替代投藥法
- 併用製品
- 新的對應方式/向OTC的轉移推進
訴訟
- 勝訴的可能性
- 學名藥的專利認證戰略
- 訴訟與和解,哪個較好呢
- 有效的短期戰略
- 專利認證戰略課題
- 歐洲的戰略
今後的展望
表
- 日本2006年度4家大規模學名藥製造業者的銷售額
- 主要學名藥防衛戰略
- 學名藥製造業者概要:2006年
- 製品防衛戰略
- 在2006年被認證為品牌藥的學名藥
圖
- 全球依銷售額區分的學名藥市場佔有:2006年
- 將在2007年迎接專利失效的暢銷藥品(以及2006年的銷售資料)
- New Chemical Entity (NCE)的市場投入:1990年至2005年
- 1990年開始至2006年10月為止的美國新生物製劑的專利認證
- 為了擴大製品生命週期的理想時間線
- 獲得認證的學名藥合約:1998年至2006年
Abstract
Introduction:
Can branded pharmaceutical companies ever win the war against generics? No.
But they can win some of the battles. Growing pressures on innovator companies
means that innovator companies are becoming more inventive in searching for
blockbuster products--which in turn increases the pressure on generics
companies to find ways of bypassing new defense barriers. Now, innovator
companies can choose from among a variety of specific, practical tactics to
defend themselves from the threat of generics--either by defending the company
as a whole or by defending key individual products that come under attack.
Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy:
- In May, 2007, after previously enjoying success from its diversification
into generics, Merck KGaA sold its generics business to Mylan for $6.6
billion. What strategy is Merck KGaA now taking to help avoid the threat of
generics and help define its future?
- Medco Health Solutions, a pharmacy benefits manager, has been looking
forward to the 2007 expiries of patents on ten major branded drugs. Which
of these drugs has Medco singled out as providing huge savings after patent
expiry?
- Biological products present several barriers to companies wishing to
manufacture imitations. Thus, an increased focus on biologics--such as
vaccines, protein products, and hormones--can help a branded company move its
product assortment out of the range of generics companies. Which companies
have already switched their R&D focus to biologics? What barriers must
generics companies overcome if they wish to play the biologics game. Which
generics players are most likely to overcome these barriers?
- Originator companies have embraced the use of authorized generics;
however, in early 2007, the FTC recommended legislative changes after
examining the issue of authorized generics. What lies ahead for this
popular tool?
- Innovator companies are more risk averse than they used to be; the latest
trend has been for companies to contract out some of their R&D risk by
cooperating with other R&D specialists--including generics companies. Which
R&D company is at the top of the list of generics companies tapped by Big
Pharma for their R&D capabilities?
Scope:
Importance of defense strategies: the slowing pace of NCE
introductions; generics penetration in the United States, Europe, and Japan;
lessons from the loss of patents to Pfizer' s Norvasc and AstraZeneca' s
Prilosec; patent expiries due in 2007 on ten major brands.
Company-based defense strategies: mergers, increased emphasis on
biologics R&D, contract research, and acquisitions of generics companies.
Product-specific defense strategies: adding patents to existing
products; developing new isomers and enantiomers of existing products;
introducing new versions, formulations, and combinations of existing products;
adding new indications for existing products; switching products from
prescription basis to OTC; pursuing litigation; launching or supplying
authorized generics.
Outlook: threats to authorized generics; cooperation between innovator
companies and generics companies; the swing to biological research.
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Strategic Considerations
- Stakeholder Implications
- Importance of Defense Strategies
- What Does Pharma Stand to Lose?
- Overview of Potential Strategies
- Company-Based Strategies
- Mergers
- Increase Emphasis on Biotech R&D
- Improved Productivity and Reduced Risk Through Contract Research
- Acquisition of a Generics Company
- Product-Based Strategies
- Additional Patents
- New Isomers or Enantiomers
- Modifi ed-Release Versions and Alternative Delivery Methods
- Combination Products
- New Indications/Switch to Over-the-Counter Promotion
- Litigation
- Prospects for Success in the Courts
- Authorized Generics Strategy
- Is It Better to Litigate or Settle?
- A Useful Short-Term Strategy
- Challenges to the Authorized Generics Strategy
- European Strategies
- Outlook
Tables
- 1. Sales of the Four Largest Domestic Generics Manufacturers in Japan,
Fiscal Year Ended March 2006
- 2. Select Generics Defense Strategies
- 3. Generics Companies Bulk Up, 2006
- 4. Product-Specifi c Defense Strategies
- 5. Branded Drugs Authorized as Generics in 2006
Figure
- 1. Worldwide Share of Generics Market by Value of Sales, 2006
- 2. Blockbusters Facing Patent Expiry in 2007 (with 2006 Worldwide Sales)
- 3. New Chemical Entity (NCE) Launches, 1990-2005
- 4. Approvals of New Biopharmaceutical Products in the United States, 1990
Through October 2006
- 5. Ideal Timeline for Extending a Product' s Lifecycle
- 6. Authorized Generics Agreements, 1998-2006
|