首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 癌症 > 癌症臨床設計的課題
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4495)
肥胖症治療 (48)
非專利藥 (117)
疫苗 (168)
神經疾病 (175)
骨頭疾病治療 (41)
動物用醫藥 (18)
處方藥 (89)
規章 (107)
感染疾病 (318)
精神病 (80)
製藥企業 (506)
糖尿病 (157)
癌症 (838)
藥物開發 (1275)
DDS (173)
OTC 非處方藥 (147)
市場調查報告書

癌症臨床設計的課題

Challenges in Oncology Clinical Trial Design

出版商 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日期 2007年03月 商品編碼 50638
內容資訊 英文 20 Pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年12月21日停止出版。

簡介

受到癌症治療的演進與存活率增加的影響,業界又開始重新評價傳統癌症醫療實驗的設計。其中,對研究人員及新藥開發業者而言,醫療實驗愈加複雜化,也意味著隨之產生新的工作及設計上的課題。

專門於醫療產業相關廣泛調查的美國市調公司 Decision Resources Inc. (總公司:Massachusetts State),針對癌症臨床設計的課題進行調查分析,並系統整理調查結果後出版報告書 "Challenges in Oncology Clinical Design" 。

本報告書內容包括:癌症治療方法、FDA指導方針、目前的評價項目等背景資訊、癌症治療藥相關醫療實驗趨勢及Novartis和Genentech的個案研究。共計20頁的內容綱要摘記如下:

實施概要

序章

癌症醫療實驗相關背景資訊

  • 癌症治療及FDA指導方針的變遷
  • 目前的療效指標
    • 存活率
    • 固態腫瘤的反應率
    • 到開始擴散之前的時間
    • 臨床上的有效評價項目
    • 生活品質

癌症醫療實驗課題

  • 選擇適當的評價項目及管理複雜的資料
  • 設計隨機化
  • 業務上的課題
  • 安全性
  • 確保醫療人員

個案研究

  • Novartis的Gleevec
  • Genentech的Tarceva

癌症醫療實驗的趨勢:代理評價項目及生物標記

  • 癌症治療用已獲認可的標的療法
  • 癌症醫療實驗中一般使用的評價項目
  • 固態腫瘤中的反應評價基準
  • 獲FDA認可的依照指導手冊的診斷

  • 對萬用藥物的平均反應率

目錄

Abstract

Introduction

The ongoing evolution of cancer therapeutics and the associated increase in survival times have prompted a reevaluation of traditional methodology in the design and conduct of oncology clinical trials. These changes have led to increasing complexity in clinical trials as well as new operational and design challenges for researchers and drug developers.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy

As cancer treatments improve and survival rates for many types of cancer increase, drug developers need to differentiate their agents using metrics other than increased survival. What are the most effective new end points for developers to use in clinical trials?

Drug developers are increasingly using surrogate end points to establish their oncology agents’ efficacy. What are the benefits of using these surrogate end points? Do regulators support the use of surrogates or will pharma companies face regulatory challenges?

The burgeoning use of surrogate end points creates a significant need to identify new biomarkers. What initiatives are now under way to stimulate oncology biomarker validation efforts? What incentive will pharma companies have to pursue development of these markers rather than viewing this approach as a significant business risk?

Scope

  • Background on oncology clinical trials: changes in cancer treatment and FDA guidelines, current end points used.
  • Challenges in oncology clinical trials: choosing appropriate end points and managing data complexity, randomization design, operational challenges, safety, and recruitment.
  • Case studies: Novartis’s Gleevec and Genentech’s Tarceva.
  • Surrogate end points: benefits to drug developers, need for new biomarkers.

Mentioned in This Spectrum Report:

Companies

  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Amgen
  • Bayer
  • BioGenex
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Chugai
  • DakoCytomation
  • Eli Lilly
  • Genentech
  • Ilex Partners
  • ImClone
  • Merck KGaA
  • Millennium
  • Novartis
  • OSI Pharmaceuticals
  • Parexel
  • Pfi zer
  • RadPharm
  • Roche
  • Seragen
  • Third Wave Technologies
  • Ventana
  • Vysis
  • Wako
  • Wyeth

Products

  • Aredia (pamidronate)
  • Avastin (bevacizumab)
  • Campath (alemtuzumab)
  • Camptosar (irinotecan)
  • Erbitux (cetuximab)
  • Gemzar (gemcitabine)
  • Gleevec (imatinib mesylate)
  • Herceptin (trastuzumab)
  • Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin)
  • Nexavar (sorafenib)
  • Ontak (denileukin difi tox)
  • Rituxan (rituximab)
  • Sprycel (dasatinib)
  • Sutent (sunitinib maleate)
  • Tarceva (erlotinib)
  • Vectibix (panitumumab)
  • Velcade (bortezomib)

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • Introduction
  • Background on Oncology Clinical Trials
    • Changes in Cancer Treatment and FDA Guidelines
    • Current End Points
      • Survival
      • Response Rate in Solid Tumors
      • Time to Progression
      • Composite Clinical Benefi t End Points
      • Quality of Life
  • Challenges in Oncology Clinical Trials
    • Choosing Appropriate End Points and Managing Data Complexity
    • Randomization Design
    • Operational Challenges
    • Safety
    • Recruitment
  • Case Studies
    • Novartis’s Gleevec
    • Genentech’s Tarceva
  • Trends in Oncology Trials-Surrogate End Points and Biomarkers

Tables

  • 1. Targeted Therapeutics Approved for the Treatment of Cancer
  • 2. Commonly Used End Points in Oncology Clinical Trials
  • 3. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
  • 4. Select FDA-Approved Companion Diagnostics

Figures

  • 1. Average Response Rates to “One-Size-Fits-All” Drugs
Back to Top