首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 生物科技 > 以基因為基之藥物開發 > 毒性生物標誌:加速新藥開發的潛力工具
產業/市場分類
生物科技 (1470)
分子標靶治療學 (51)
生技設備 (321)
生物材料 (55)
生物標記 (157)
以基因為基之藥物開發 (201)
再生醫學 (120)
抗體和免疫 (187)
個人化醫學 (54)
基因治療學和RNAi (101)
市場調查報告書

毒性生物標誌:加速新藥開發的潛力工具

Toxicity Biomarkers: Promising Tools for Accelerated Drug Development

出版商 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日期 2006年12月 商品編碼 45811
內容資訊 英文 27 Pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年12月21日停止出版。

簡介

由於毒性不透明性導致撤出新藥開發陣營的案例層出不窮之際,製藥企業正在摸索能夠將新藥開發的風險及成本壓至最低的方法。被寄望能夠削減成本、縮短上市時間以及開發安全藥劑的乃是毒性生物標誌。

廣泛調查醫療業界的美國專業市調公司 Decision Resources Inc. (總公司:麻州),調查與分析毒性生物標誌的動向,並有系統地出版綜合報告書 "Toxicity Biomarkers: Promising Tools for Accelerated Drug Development"

此報告書使用27頁的篇幅,除了說明毒物生物標誌的使用動向、生物標誌的可能性與課題,也探討企業的開發動向、毒性生物標誌的未來展望等。此報告書的概略架構如下所示。

摘要

藥劑毒性:開發者的永久性課題

將傳統研究應用在毒性學時的困難

毒性生物標誌在新藥開發上的應用與優點

  • 何謂生物標誌
  • 為何利用毒性生物標誌

毒物基因體學:毒物生物標誌的特定技術

  • 基因表達圖譜
  • 蛋白質體學
  • 新陳代謝圖譜
  • 基因型決定

毒物生物標誌的使用案例

  • 肝毒性的α-Glutathion S-Transferase
  • 腎臟毒性的腎損傷分子-1
  • 心臟毒性的Troponin
  • 睪丸毒性的Inhibin B

新藥開發的毒性生物標誌導入課題

  • 技術性問題
  • 生物標誌的妥當性
  • 生物資訊/整合
  • 智慧財產

關鍵途徑與生物標誌的發現

產業動向

  • 共同開發的共識
    • Aureus Pharma, ChemAxon, Sanofi-Aventis, Budapest University of Technology and Economic
    • BG Medicine
    • Ciphergen Biosystems
    • Clinical Data
    • Gene Logic
    • Iconix Biosciences
    • Metabometrix
    • RxGen
  • 企業間合作
    • International Life Science Institute Health and Environmental Science Institute
    • Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
    • Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology
    • Drug-induced Liver Injury Network

毒物生物標誌的未來展望

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Introduction

In the wake of several notorious drug withdrawals caused by unsuspected toxicities, pharmaceutical companies are searching for ways to minimize the escalating risks and costs of drug development. Biomarkers of toxicity offer the hope of producing safer drugs while cutting costs and time to market and are inspiring some novel collaborations.

Get the Answers You Need to Shape Your Strategy

Drug development productivity is declining while costs rise. What factors contribute to this situation? How big a role does toxicity play? How can toxicity biomarkers change the equation? The FDA is encouraging identification and validation of biomarkers. What initiatives are under way? What companies are developing toxicity biomarkers? Who are their collaborators? A biomarker strategy is a must to succeed in today' s extremely competitive drug development environment. What challenges do companies face? What is the time frame for the realization of toxicity biomarkers? What are the technologies to watch? What is the recommended course of action for the near and long term?

Scope of This Spectrum Report

  • Uses of toxicity biomarkers: Drug development, clinical trials, aid in go/no-go decision making, identify off-targets, select lead compound, choose the best animal model, identify interspecies biomarkers of toxicity, stratify patients, adjust schedule/dose.
  • Potential biomarkers: Alpha-glutathion S-transferase, kidney injury molecule-1, troponins, inhibin B.
  • Initiatives and organizations: Critical Path initiative, C-Path Institute, International Life Sciences Institute, Health and Environmental Science Institute, Predictive Safety Testing Consortium, Eureka, Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology, Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity Network, Voluntary Genomics Data Submission, Biomarker Qualification Pilot Process.
  • Challenges: Technical issues, biomarker validation, bioinformatics, intellectual property.

Mentioned in This Spectrum Report

Companies and Organizations

  • Abbott
  • Aegerion Pharmaceuticals
  • Affymetrix
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca
  • Aureus Pharma
  • Bayer
  • BG Medicine
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Budapest University of Technology and
  • Economics
  • Cambridge Antibody Technology
  • ChemAxon
  • Ciphergen
  • Clinical Data
  • Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology
  • C-Path Institute
  • Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network
  • Eli Lilly
  • Environmental Science Institute
  • Enzon Pharmaceuticals
  • Eureka
  • Food and Drug Administration
  • GeneLogic
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Iconic Biosciences
  • Icoria
  • Imperial College, London
  • International Life Science Institute
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Liver Toxicology Biomarker Study
  • Merck
  • Metabometrix
  • Micromet
  • Mitsubishi Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Novartis
  • Pfi zer
  • Pharmacia
  • Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
  • Roche
  • RxGen
  • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Warner-Lambert
  • Waters
  • Wyeth-Ayerst
  • Technologies
  • Bioinformatics
  • DrugMatrix database
  • Gas chromatography
  • Gene expression profi ling
  • Genesis Enterprise System
  • Genotyping
  • KnowTox
  • Liquid chromatography
  • Mass spectrometry
  • Metabolic profi ling (metabolomics,
  • metabonomics)
  • Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
  • Open Array platform
  • PrimaTox
  • Proteomics
  • SNP assay
  • Systems toxicology
  • ToxExpress
  • ToxFX Analysis
  • ToxShield

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
  • Strategic Considerations
  • Stakeholder Implications
  • Drug Toxicity: An Ongoing Challenge for Developers
  • Drawbacks of Traditional Approaches to Toxicology
  • Applications and Benefits of Biomarkers of Toxicity in Drug Development
  • What Is a Biomarker?
  • Why Use Biomarkers of Toxicity?
  • Toxicogenomics: Technologies for Identifying Biomarkers of Toxicity
  • Gene Expression Profiling
  • Proteomics
  • Metabolic Profiling
  • Genotyping
  • Examples of Potential Biomarkers of Toxicity
  • α-Glutathion S-Transferase in Hepatotoxicity
  • Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Nephrotoxicity
  • Troponins in Cardiotoxicity
  • Inhibin B in Testicular Toxicity
  • Challenges in Integrating Biomarkers of Toxicity into Drug Development
  • Technical Issues
  • Biomarker Validation
  • Bioinformatics/Integration
  • Intellectual Property
  • The Critical Path Initiative and Biomarker Discovery
  • Industry Trends
  • Collaborative Agreements
  • Aureus Pharma, ChemAxon, Sanofi-Aventis, and Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • BG Medicine 17
  • Ciphergen Biosystems
  • Clinical Data
  • Gene Logic
  • Iconix Biosciences
  • Metabometrix
  • RxGen
  • Consortia
  • International Life Science Institute Health and Environmental Science Institute
  • Predictive Safety Testing Consortium
  • Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology
  • Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network
  • Outlook for Biomarkers of Toxicity

Tables

  • 1. Select Drug Withdrawals Due to Safety Issues, 1997-2005
  • 2. Metabolizing Enzymes Implicated in Drug-Induced Toxicity
  • 3. Biomarker Classification
  • 4. Profiled Companies Active in Development of Biomarkers of Toxicity
  • 5. Profile of the Affymetrix/Iconix ToxFX Chip

Figures

  • 1. Reasons for Termination of New Compounds
  • 2. Applications and Benefits of Biomarkers of Toxicity in Drug Development
  • 3. Schematic Example of Using DNA Microarray Technology in Biomarker Discovery
  • 4. 2DGE/MS-Based Protein Analysis Scheme in Biomarker Discovery
  • 5. Framework for Data Integration from Different Technology Platforms
Back to Top