首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 生物科技 > 以基因為基之藥物開發 > 轉譯醫學生物標的對業界的影響
產業/市場分類
生物科技 (1470)
分子標靶治療學 (51)
生技設備 (321)
生物材料 (55)
生物標記 (157)
以基因為基之藥物開發 (201)
再生醫學 (120)
抗體和免疫 (187)
個人化醫學 (54)
基因治療學和RNAi (101)
市場調查報告書

轉譯醫學生物標的對業界的影響

How Are Translational Medicine Biomarkers Impacting Industry?

出版商 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日期 2006年06月 商品編碼 42186
內容資訊 英文  
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年12月21日停止出版。

簡介

由於基礎研究的結果無法迅速發展為有價值的醫療成果,故新藥物的研發失敗率只能走向攀升一途,結果讓轉譯醫學成為藥物研發中急速成長的領域之一。

廣泛調查醫療業界的美國專業市調公司 Decision Resources Inc. (總公司:麻州),調查分析了轉譯醫學生物標的對業界的影響後,出版了一本綜合報告書"How Are Translational Medicine Biomarkers Impacting Industry?"

報告書內容包括:使用生物標的的轉譯醫學引進後藥物研發過程的進化、各種生物標的與新影像技術、臨床用生物標的二大引進實例研究、由實例研究所獲得的心得等等,內容綱要摘記如下:

轉譯醫學的黎明

近年 FDA 的動態

生物標的的使用

FDA 對改善藥物研發的支援與直接參與

  • 研究用生物標的
    • 癌症研究
    • 阿茲海默症研究
  • 毒物學用生物標的
  • 藥理基因學用生物標的

臨床用生物標的的價值

  • 由 COX-2 阻礙劑 Rofecoxib(Vioxx)所得的教訓
  • 由 Gefitinib(AstraZeneca 的 Iressa)所得的教訓

基因資料自我的問題

  • FDA 對藥理基因資料的立場
  • 臨床基因生物標的

對新影像技術的高度期待

Theranostics/競爭診斷

  • Roche 的診斷與 Lilly 的癌症藥物
  • Clinical Data 的憂鬱症治療藥物測試
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb 的承諾

使用生物標的產生的影響

附錄:76 個計畫關鍵路徑(Critical Path)的機會:2006 年 3 月

目錄

Abstract

In This Issue...

Failure rates for the development of new drugs will continue to rise if basic research findings cannot be quickly turned into valuable medicines. The result of increasing drug failures will be a pharmaceutical industry that is unsustainable, an industry that will not be able to refresh lean drug development pipelines merely by pushing more preclinical projects into development. As a result, translational medicine is one of the fastest growing areas of drug discovery and development today. Biomarkers are at the heart of this effort. This report looks at the modernization of the drug development process through widespread adoption of translational studies using biomarkers. We discuss different types of biomarkers, including the potential use of new imaging technologies, and assess whether these changes are sufficient to reverse the industry's productivity decline. We review two case studies on drugs that could have benefited from having clinic-ready biomarkers and examine what lessons can be learned. Lastly, some companies are engaged in developing biomarkers in combination with drugs. We discuss some of these companies, their products, and the role of the FDA in promoting such co-development activities.

Table of Contents

  • The Dawn of Translational Medicine
  • Recent FDA Initiatives
  • Uses of Biomarkers
  • The FDA's Support and Direct Involvement in Improving the Development of Medical Products
    • Research Biomarkers
      • Cancer Research
      • Alzheimer's Disease Research
    • Toxicity Biomarkers
    • Pharmacogenetic Biomarkers
  • The Value of Clinic-Ready Biomarkers
    • Lessons to Be Learned from the COX-2 Inhibitor Rofecoxib (Vioxx)
    • Lessons to Be Learned from Gefitinib (AstraZeneca's Iressa)
  • Unique Challenges of Genomic Data
    • The FDA's Position on Pharmacogenomic Data
    • Genomic Biomarkers in the Clinic
  • High Hopes for New Imaging Techniques
  • Theranostics/Companion Diagnostics
    • Roche Diagnostics and Lilly Cancer Drugs
    • Clinical Data's Depression Drug Test
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb's Commitment
  • Potential Impact of Biomarker Use
  • Addendum: Critical Path Opportunities List of 76 Priority Projects-March 2006
Back to Top