首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 藥物開發 > 醫藥品的研究開發趨勢:新的策略對藥物生產線會帶來何種結果
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4816)
肥胖症治療 (44)
非專利藥 (129)
疫苗 (181)
神經疾病 (172)
骨頭疾病治療 (37)
動物用醫藥 (17)
處方藥 (156)
規章 (126)
感染疾病 (346)
精神病 (84)
製藥企業 (524)
糖尿病 (191)
癌症 (909)
藥物開發 (1449)
DDS (182)
OTC 非處方藥 (150)
市場調查報告書

醫藥品的研究開發趨勢:新的策略對藥物生產線會帶來何種結果

Rethinking Pharmaceutical R&D: Will New Strategies Yield a Pipeline Payoff?

出版商 Decision Resources, Inc.
出版日期 2009年09月 商品編碼 100337
內容資訊 英文 24 Pages
價格
US $ 4600 PDF by E-mail (Global License)


醫藥品的研究開發趨勢:新的策略對藥物生產線會帶來何種結果 是由出版商Decision Resources, Inc.在2009年09月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含24 Pages 價格從美金4600起跳。

簡介

本報告書內容包括:研究開發的生産性和技術策略、研究開發的組織構成、透過事業開發的研究開發、與其他公司的聯盟、今後的展望等、內容綱要摘記如下:

實施摘要

介紹

技術策略:是否有效果

  • 創藥的産業化
  • 生物醫藥品的平台
  • 生物科學:大型製藥公司的技術聯盟

組織構成和策略

  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Novartis
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi-Aventis

透過事業開發的研究開發

製藥公司間的聯盟

  • AstraZeneca和Merck:癌症的早期階段開發
  • GlaxoSmithKlineとPfizer:為HIV的合併企業

研究開發轉移至中國及印度

今後的醫藥品研究開發展望

目錄

Abstract

Introduction

Can radical changes to the structures and strategies of pharmaceutical R&D operations - such as creating more entrepreneurial environments modeled upon biotech companies - increase their productivity? Many major companies are reorganizing the research branches of their businesses and fi nding creative ways to partner with biotech companies and with each other to access or acquire promising technologies and pipelines. Their goal is to reinvigorate R&D and combat the effects of patent expirations, generics competition, and other industry pressures.

Questions Answered in This Report

  • In recent years, drug developers have invested heavily in various R&D technologies. Is this investment increasing R&D productivity? What technology strategies are most promising? What new approaches are pharmaceutical companies using to access enabling technologies for drug discovery?
  • Pharmaceutical companies are seeking to reinvigorate R&D organizations to improve productivity. What steps are leading companies taking to change R&D? What structures and strategies have already been implemented within Big Pharma R&D organizations? Can pharmaceutical companies replicate the innovation of biotech companies by reforming R&D?
  • Biotech companies are an important source of novel technologies and drug candidates. How do acquisitions of and collaborations with biotech companies fi t into Big Pharma' s R&D strategies? How can companies use business development activities to build up technological capabilities and pipelines?
  • Several Big Pharma companies are charting new territory in early-stage pharma-pharma dealmaking. Which companies have recently formed innovative partnerships that include early-stage development? What are the key features of these arrangements? How do these ventures meet the strategic needs of both partners?

Scope

  • Technology strategies: Use of high-throughput technologies and R&D productivity, biologics platforms, pharma-pharma ventures for enabling technology development.
  • Organizational structures and strategies: Restructuring R&D, emulating biotech, case studies of R&D reorganization.
  • Building R&D through business development: M&As, collaborations, R&D strategies.
  • Pharma-pharma partnering: Strategic alliances among Big Pharma companies, Phase I codevelopment collaboration, therapeutic area joint venture.
  • Outsourcing R&D: China, India, potential advantages and disadvantages.
  • Outlook for pharmaceutical R&D: Changing business models, personalized medicine, pursuing novel targets, collaboration, high-throughput strategies, translational medicine.

Mentioned in This Report

  • Adnexus Therapeutics
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca
  • BiPar Sciences
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Cambridge Antibody Technology
  • Coley Pharmaceutical
  • CovX Research
  • Dyax
  • Eli Lilly
  • Endra
  • Enlight Biosciences
  • Exelixis
  • Genentech
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • GlycoFi
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • KAI Pharmaceuticals
  • Kosan Biosciences
  • Medarex
  • MedImmune
  • Merck
  • Nissan Chemical Industries
  • Novartis
  • Oxford BioMedica
  • PDL BioPharma
  • Pfi zer
  • PureTech Ventures
  • Regeneron
  • Renovis
  • Rinat Neurosciences
  • Roche
  • Sirtris
  • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Teijin Pharma
  • Wyeth
  • Zymogenetics

Table of Contents

  • Executive Summary
    • Strategic Considerations
    • Stakeholder Implications
  • Introduction
  • Technology Strategies - Will They Pay Off?
    • The Industrialization of Drug Discovery
    • Biologics Platforms
    • Enlight Biosciences: Big Pharma' s Technology Collaboration
  • Organizational Structures and Strategies
    • GlaxoSmithKline
    • Novartis
    • Pfi zer
    • Sanofi -Aventis
  • Building R&D Through Business Development
  • Pharma-Pharma Partnering
    • AstraZeneca and Merck: Early-Stage Development for Cancer
    • GlaxoSmithKline and Pfi zer: A Joint Venture for HIV
  • Moving R&D to China and India
  • Outlook for Pharmaceutical R&D

Tables

  • 1. Top-Selling Biologic Drugs
  • 2. Bristol-Myers Squibb' s “String of Pearls” Deals
  • 3. GlaxoSmithKline/Pfi zer HIV Joint Venture Portfolio

Figures

  • 1. Combined R&D Expense vs. New Molecular Entity Approvals for 15 Top Pharmaceutical Companies, 2000-2008
  • 2. Business Model for Enlight Biosciences
  • 3. Simplifi ed Scheme of the Mechanisms of Action of MK-2206 and AZD-6244
Back to Top