Cover Image
市場調查報告書

前列腺癌:KOL (關鍵意見領袖) 分析

Prostate Cancer: KOL Insight

出版商 FirstWord 商品編碼 268897
出版日期 內容資訊 英文
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
前列腺癌:KOL (關鍵意見領袖) 分析 Prostate Cancer: KOL Insight
出版日期: 2015年11月01日 內容資訊: 英文
簡介

本報告提供前列腺癌的已上市藥物及正在開發的藥物的相關調查,前列腺癌的治療方法的變化,治療的選項,STAMPEDE及CHAARTED實驗與其影響,聯合治療疑慮,未滿足需求等相關資料,美國及歐洲的12名關鍵意見領袖 (KOL) 的各種見解彙整。

調查對象

  • 雄激素抑制劑
    • 已上市藥物
      • Xtandi (enzalutamide; Astellas/Medivation)
      • Zytiga (abiraterone acetate; Johnson & Johnson)
    • 開發平台藥物
      • Apalutamide (JNJ-927/ARN-509; Johnson & Johnson)
      • Galeterone (TOK-001; Tokai)
  • 骨標靶治療
    • 已上市藥物
      • Xgeva (denosumab; Amgen)
      • Xofigo (radium-223 dichloride; Algeta/Bayer)
  • 免疫療法
    • 已上市藥物
      • Provenge (sipuleucel-T; Valeant)
    • 開發平台藥物
      • DCVAC/PCa (dendritic cell-based vaccine; Sotio)
      • ProstAtak (Advantagene)
      • Prostvac (rilimogene galvacirepvec-rilimogene glafolivec; Bavarian Nordic/Bristol-Myers Squibb)
      • Yervoy (ipilimumab; Bristol-Myers Squibb)
  • 其他的新療法
    • 開發平台藥物
      • Custirsen (OGX-011; OncoGenex/Teva)
      • Masitinib (AB-1010; AB Science)
      • ODM-201 (BAY 1841788; Bayer/Orion)

主要的調查專題

  • 識別患者人口的未滿足需求以找出最能收益化這些機會的治療方法
  • CHAARTED、STAMPEDE實驗對進化的治療範例的影響
  • 轉移性、非轉移性疾病的現在、未來的治療選項
  • 對聯合治療的選擇因素、具高藥物抗性的腫瘤增生的畏懼和治療選擇的影響
  • 前列腺癌的臨床試驗的試驗指標的性質變化和醫生、醫療費支付者的接受度
  • 已上市&開發平台治療藥的抗性,安全性,有效性的優勢和值得注意的臨床試驗

本網頁內容可能與最新版本有所差異。詳細情況請與我們聯繫。

目錄
Product Code: 596200417

The last decade has seen significant change in how prostate cancer is treated. Innovation and lifecycle management have each played a role in shaping today's treatment paradigm. But how will results from landmark studies such as STAMPEDE and CHAARTED impact current treatment decisions? And which products will emerge victorious in the battle for market share?

Prostate Cancer: KOL Insight looks at the future of prostate cancer therapy and provides insight from 12 leading North American and European KOLs. How will marketed and late-stage pipeline drugs continue to be used?

Answering Key Questions

Androgen inhibitors

Marketed Therapies

  • Xtandi (enzalutamide; Astellas/Medivation). Will this drug be used in earlier treatment settings, e.g. high-risk non-metastatic disease?
  • Zytiga (abiraterone acetate; Johnson & Johnson). Is the need for corticosteroid co-administration a competitive disadvantage? And could it play a role in metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer?

Pipeline Therapies

  • Apalutamide (JNJ-927/ARN-509; Johnson & Johnson). Can this drug differentiate itself in an increasingly competitive market? Will its potential side-effect advantages increase its long-term potential?
  • Galeterone (TOK-001; Tokai). Will biomarker-led selection help it find its place, particularly for patients with resistance to other treatments? Or will it lose out to treatments for wider patient populations

Bone-targeted therapies

Marketed drugs

  • Xgeva (denosumab; Amgen). Will more targeted drug use earlier in the treatment algorithm reduce uptake of Xgeva in the longer term? In the shorter term, is cost slowing adoption?
  • Xofigo (radium-223 dichloride; Algeta/Bayer). Is this drug being used too late in the treatment algorithm to maximise its effectiveness?

Immunotherapies

Marketed drugs

  • Provenge (sipuleucel-T; Valeant). Ambivalence toward Provenge remains high amongst US oncologists; is it an under-appreciated option or do logistics and costs preclude wider uptake?

Pipeline drugs

  • DCVAC/PCa (dendritic cell-based vaccine; Sotio). Will the fact that it's simpler to administer than Provenge offer a chance of success?
  • ProstAtak (Advantagene). KOL interest is high, but will concerns about Phase III study design affect how it's viewed?
  • Prostvac (rilimogene galvacirepvec-rilimogene glafolivec; Bavarian Nordic/Bristol-Myers Squibb). With Provenge not living up to expectations, will vaccine treatments suffer by association until trial results are clear?
  • Yervoy (ipilimumab; Bristol-Myers Squibb). With two failed trials casting a shadow, will finding a specific patient group that is responsive in early disease be key to success?

Other new therapies

Pipeline drugs

  • Custirsen (OGX-011; OncoGenex/Teva). Will the failure to reach its primary overall survival endpoint in the SYNERGY trial outweigh the hope of finding an appropriate sub-group for treatment?
  • Masitinib (AB-1010; AB Science). Will results from small-scale trials and toxicity worries be too high a hurdle for this treatment to overcome?
  • ODM-201 (BAY 1841788; Bayer/Orion). Can this therapy find a foothold in the non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer setting?

Top takeaways

  • A new gold standard of care has emerged: Results from the STAMPEDE and CHAARTED trials have already transformed first-line treatment
  • Earlier use of targeted treatments will drive treatment paradigm change: KOLs are predicting that some drugs will move up the treatment paradigm
  • New indications expected for existing treatments: In an increasingly competitive market, some brands are looking to establish a foothold in undertreated populations
  • Tolerability is a key concern for combination treatments: Uncertainty whether the benefits of combination therapies outweigh potential drawbacks
  • Further change expected as more targeted treatments are developed: Trial results eagerly anticipated for therapies offering new mechanisms of action, including biomarker-driven therapy
  • The future of vaccines remains unclear: KOLs share mixed opinions on the place for vaccines
  • Concerns over trial design persist: Calls for more innovative trials to meet current challenges

Key issues explorede

  • Identifying remaining unmet needs by patient population, and clarifying which treatments are most likely to be able to capitalise on these opportunities
  • The impact of the CHAARTED and STAMPEDE trials on the evolving treatment paradigm
  • The differences in current and evolving treatment choices for metastatic and non-metastatic disease
  • Factors affecting the choice of combination therapies, and how fears of creating very resistant tumours are influencing treatment decisions
  • The changing nature of endpoints in prostate cancer clinical trials, and whether these will be acceptable to physicians and payers
  • How marketed and pipeline therapies stack up in terms of tolerability, safety and efficacy, and which trials should be monitored

Contributors

KOLs from North America

  • Andrew J Armstrong; Associate Professor of Medicine and Surgery and Medical Oncologist at Duke University and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
  • David E. Crawford; Professor of Surgery, Urology, and Radiation Oncology, and head of the Section of Urologic Oncology at the University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Michael R. Harrison; Assistant Professor of Medicine and Member of the Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
  • Ashley E. Ross; Assistant Professor of Urology, Oncology and Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Neha Vapiwala; Associate Professor and the Vice Chair of Education in the Department of Radiation Oncology at University of Pennsylvania, PA
  • Michael J. Zelefsky; Vice Chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Research; Chief, Brachytherapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY

KOLs from Europe

  • Raffaele Ardito; Head of the Day Oncology Unit at Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
  • Amit Bahl; Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Clinical Director, Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol, UK
  • Nicolas B. Delongchamps; Consultant, Cochin Hospital in Paris and Professor at Paris Descartes's University, France
  • John P. Logue; Consultant Clinical Oncologist, The Christie Clinic, Manchester, UK
  • Anonymous German KOL University Professor and Clinical Head of a Urology Clinic
  • Anonymous German KOL; University Professor and Medical Director at a University Clinic of Urology

Ongoing Benefits

The world of pharma is ever changing and executives must always be up-to-date with new developments that could affect their own products, position and research. That is why FirstWord's guarantee to keep Therapy Trends clients up to date with Update Bulletins offers a real commercial advantage.

Update Bulletins include expert insight and analysis based on FirstWord analyst re-engagement with the KOLs after major events such as product approvals, key data releases and major conferences to deliver the most valuable insights with each update.

  • Your Therapy Trends Report purchase entitles you to receive three Update Bulletins, which are published approximately every three months for 12 months following the report's publication date, October 2014.
  • You will receive a copy of each Update Bulletin once available, which are issued each quarter after the publication date.
Back to Top