|
市場調查報告書
發電產業中碳規定的影響
The Impact of Carbon Regulation on Power Generation
|
本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。
EU-ETS(排放交易)賦與減碳行為經濟價値,創造出排放市場,電力公司雖有意改變發電組合,減少碳依存度,但目前EU的規定框架不構成刺激企業行動的威脅或動機。
本報告書內容包括:歐洲發電產業碳規定的影響等。內容綱要摘記如下:
第1章 DATAMONITOR的觀點
第2章 分析
- 形成現在及未來瓦斯、石油、煤、碳關係的動態顯示出長期碳價格上漲的趨勢
- 瓦斯價格及碳價格的正向關係變強,瓦斯的季節性價格更加不穩定
- 石油正成為與沒有季節性變化的瓦斯相關的碳價格的替代性選擇
- 長期而言,碳價格及能源價格預計將上漲
- 未來可能的3種方案
- 只要公用事業企業的營業費用不超過收益,目前的發電廠就不會關閉
- 除了碳定價及獎勵之外,商業損益平衡點的設定是根據能源利用變化,而非受化石燃油停止使用影響
- 綠色能源的規模快速成長的事實影響了所有發電技術的商業損益平衡點
- 碳政策及石油危機動態大幅改變化石燃油的供給曲線,使綠色能源更具吸引力
- 過去,歐洲的公用事業企業從歐洲的碳規定當中獲得的利多於弊
- 發電企業有3種轉換成污染量更少之火力發電的手段,以做為針對碳減量的因應對策
- 既有電力公司的轉換決定根據不同的決策規則
- 依照現在的價格水準,就算實施制價規則,但仍不會出現由煤轉為瓦斯的技術轉換
- EU-ETS的嚴格規範條件將引起煤火力發電設備及CCGT廠的長期轉換
附錄
Abstract
Overview
Introduction
EU-ETS intended to create a continental market for emissions by attaching an
economic value to the carbon externality thereby encouraging power utilities
to shift their power generation mix towards less carbon intensive alternatives
at the least cost. In practice however, the current EU regulatory framework
poses little threat or incentive for utilities to switch away from ' dirty'
generation.
Scope
- Sixty-day rolling correlation data and trends for day ahead gas / EUA spot
returns and Brent spot / EUA spot returns for the 2005 to 2008 period.
- Three long-term oil, gas, coal, carbon and power pricing scenarios plus
Datamonitor' s estimation of the most likely long-term scenario.
- Analysis of power generation supply and demand dynamics for fossil fuels
and alternative energies, both with and without carbon pricing.
- Insight into reasons why the current EU regulatory framework poses little
threat or incentive for utilities to switch away from ' dirty' generation.
Report Highlights
To date, European utilities have gained more than they have ' pained' from
European carbon regulation. This is a trend which is likely to continue until
and unless auctioning is introduced in the new EU climate package. Until then,
and at current prices, a large scale switch from coal to gas appears unlikely,
regardless of the pricing rule adopted.
The increasingly positive correlation between gas and carbon prices has been
destabilized, in part, by the seasonality of gas. Oil, however, is acting as a
positively correlated non-seasonal gas proxy for carbon prices. The dynamics
shaping the interrelationship between gas, oil, coal and carbon suggest that
carbon prices will rise long-term.
Fossil fuel commercial breakeven without carbon pricing is a function of total
energy demand, not fossil fuel switch-off and will increasingly be impacted by
the rapid scaling of ' green' energy sources, particularly as carbon policies
and peak oil dynamics steepen the fossil fuels supply curve, making clean
energy more attractive.
Reasons to Purchase
- Assess the current and likely future degree of correlation between oil,
gas and carbon prices and what it means for long term carbon and energy prices
- Identify how very different carbon prices can trigger the power switching
threshold under different decision rules and pricing scenarios
- Understand why long-term substitutions between coal-fired units and CCGT
plants will only take place under very restrictive conditions
Table of Contents
- DATAMONITOR VIEW
- ANALYSIS
- The current and likely future dynamics shaping the interrelationship
between gas, oil, coal and carbon suggest that carbon prices will rise long
term
- The prices of gas and carbon are exhibiting increased positive
correlation trends, destabilized mostly by the seasonality of gas
- Oil is acting as a positively correlated non-seasonal gas proxy for
carbon prices
- In the long term, carbon prices and energy prices are likely to
increase
- Going forward, three likely scenarios will dictate the future
correlation between fossil fuel prices and carbon prices
- Utilities are unlikely to decommission viable power plants unless the
variable costs of continued operation exceed revenues
- Commercial breakeven without carbon pricing or incentives is caused by
an inflexion in energy use, not fossil fuel switch-off
- The rapid scaling of ' green' energy sources will impact the commercial
breakeven of all power generation technologies
- Carbon policies and peak oil dynamics are designed to steepen the
fossil fuels supply curve, making clean energy more attractive
- To date, European utilities have gained more than they have ' pained'
from European carbon regulation
- Power generators have three means of switching to less polluting
thermal generation to hedge against the carbon externality
- An incumbent power utility' s decision to switch is generally made on
the basis of different decision rules
- At current prices, a technological switch from coal to gas appears
unlikely, regardless of the pricing rule adopted
- Under the EU ETS, long-term substitutions between coal-fired units and
CCGT plants will take place under very restrictive conditions
- APPENDIX
- Ask the analyst
- Datamonitor consulting
- Disclaimer
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: The 60-day rolling correlation between gas and EU Allowance
(EUA) prices has a long-term mostly positive upward trend
- Figure 2: The 60-day rolling correlation between Brent spot and EUA spot
returns has a long-term upward trend and is largely positive
- Figure 3: Global cap and trade mechanisms will lead to higher carbon
prices as the demand side scenario prevails
- Figure 4: Without carbon pricing, thermal plant breakeven varies with
overall energy demand
- Figure 5: Theoretical plant commercial breakeven is driven down by (cap
and trade) carbon pricing
- Figure 6: The divergence in ' 07 and ' 08 EUA prices has increased the
potential and scale of windfall profits in the power sector
- Figure 7: The threshold carbon price varies depending on the decision
rules adopted by power utilities
- Figure 8: When considering a switch, pricing and decision rules must
first be considered
- Figure 9: Currently, EUA prices appear to be well below all of the power
generation switching threshold scenarios
|