首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 環境 > 環境趨勢 > 歐洲碳批發市場發展
產業/市場分類
環境 (610)
水處理 (190)
隔膜技術 (70)
環境趨勢 (196)
CO2 降低 (84)
市場調查報告書

歐洲碳批發市場發展

European Wholesale Carbon Market Development

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2008年07月 商品編碼 71322
內容資訊 英文  
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。

簡介

報告書內容包括:京都議定書概要、氣候變遷相關規範、排放權交易、碳市場動向、鷗盟主要市場未來發展等等,內容綱要摘記如下:

DATAMONITOR的看法

分析

  • 排放權交易可以讓各國達到以京都議定書為基礎的削減義務
    • 京都議定書讓先進國家有遵守Cap and Trade制度的義務
    • 排放權交易是經濟刺激帶來的污染管理行政性手段
    • EU-ETS是先進的排放權交易制度
  • 全球排放權交易市場由歐洲主導
    • EU-ETS獨占2007年的全球排放權交易
    • 2007年,EU-ETS的交易額保持領先
    • 對歐盟來說,創造「全球的」碳市場是很重要的
    • 歐洲碳大部分在店面交易
    • 無匯率變動:ECX持續領導歐盟排放權交易標準化市場
    • EUA-II價格在2006年中回復
  • 由於以EU-ETS Phase II與III為基礎的排放權交易重啟,故碳市場的重要性節節上升
    • ETS Phase II讓市場基本結構劇烈變化
    • EU-ETS Phase II比Phase I嚴苛,受到EUA的需求與價格影響
    • ETS偏好利用Phase II的碳配額,降低Phase III的碳產出
    • 對需求與價格的壓力增加,以致目前的削減目標可能伴隨風險
    • 德國、英國、義大利、波蘭、西班牙等國2008年的碳配額不足
    • 歐洲各國ETS Phase II的削減需求劇烈增加,Phase III更加擴大
    • 碳削減不足讓歐洲批發市場增大,抵銷燃料變更、CCS、供給限制

附錄

目錄

Abstract

Overview

Introduction

Against a backdrop of challenging carbon abatement targets and reduced European carbon emission allocations, the role of traded carbon markets is growing in importance as the second leg of the EU-ETS takes effect. The marketing and product development for carbon financial instruments is growing rapidly as greater volumes are swapped on increasingly liquid platforms across Europe

Scope

  • An overview of the Kyoto Protocol, climate change regulations, emissions trading and carbon markets, with a particular emphasis on phase 2 of EU-ETS
  • Detailed analysis of Phase 2 of ETS and the bullish implications for EUA demand and pricing against a backdrop of considerable upside risk
  • Insight as to why demand for carbon credits will differ greatly across Europe, underpinned by generation mix and fuel switching capabilities analysis
  • A range of carbon compliance scenarios based on the likely evolution of the power generation mix in key EU markets and the impact on carbon markets

Report Highlights

The over-allocation of EUAs and ensuing lack of price-tension seen during phase 1 of EU-ETS will not be repeated in Phase 2. The phase 2 cap - well below 2007 adjusted emissions - has set the tone for a very ambitious energy-policy package out to 2020 which points to significantly higher carbon prices and demand over 2008-20

The optimal compliance strategy for the ETS as a whole is to use the largest possible allocation of carbon credits during Phase 2, thereby minimizing the cost of compliance in Phase 2 to the €40/t implied by the LRMC curve while buying time to build the extra switching capacity needed to meet the cap over Phase 3

Reasons to Purchase

  • Understand how carbon markets are likely to evolve as key European players leverage switching capabilities within their power generation mix
  • Leverage Phase 2 of the EU-ETS to your advantage having understood how demand, supply and price conditions are likely to evolve in key EU markets
  • Formulate and apply successful strategies to leverage greater demand for financial carbon instruments as liquidity and price efficiencies materialise

Table of Contents

  • DATAMONITOR VIEW
    • CATALYST
    • SUMMARY
    • SOURCES
  • ANALYSIS
    • Emissions trading allows countries to meet their carbon abatement obligations under the Kyoto Protocol
      • The Kyoto Protocol binds most developed nations to a capand trade system
      • Emissions trading is an administrative approach used to control pollution by way of economic incentives
      • The European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) is the leading emissions trading system
    • The ' global' carbon emission trading market is still very much Eurocentric
      • EU-ETS continued to dominate global carbon trading volumes in 2007
      • In 2007, EU- ETS sustained its lead in terms of total traded financial values
      • The EU is pivotal to establishing a truly ' global' carbon market
      • An increasing majority of European carbon is traded over-the-counter
      • No changes on the exchanges: the ECX continues to lead the standardized market for EU emissions trading
      • EUA-II prices recovered strongly mid 2006 on the expectation that Phase II compliance caps would be tightened
      • EUA-II prices recovered strongly mid 2006 on the expectation that Phase II compliance caps would be tightened
    • Carbon markets will grow in importance as emission trading is reborn under phases II and III of EU-ETS
      • ETS Phase II will bring a dramatic shift in market fundamentals
      • Phase II of EU-ETS looks a lot tighter than Phase 1 and has bullish implications for EUA demand and pricing
      • It is likely that ETS installations will largely favour the use of carbon credits in Phase II and lower carbon generation in Phase III
      • Upside risks could be introduced into current abatement targets, causing more upward pressure on demand and pricing
      • Germany, the UK, Italy, Poland and Spain will be structurally short carbon credits in 2008, based on their respective 2007 emissions
      • European countries will see a dramatic rise in the need for carbon abatement in Phase II ETS, and to a much larger extent Phase III
      • Carbon abatement shortfalls will drive European wholesale market growth, offset by fuel switching, CCS and limited supply
  • APPENDIX
    • Definitions
    • Ask the analyst
    • Datamonitor consulting
    • Disclaimer
  • List of Figures
    • Figure 1: EUA trading forms the bulk of traded volumes,followed by project-based activities and voluntary transactions
    • Figure 2: EUA trading forms the bulk of trading values,followed by project-based activities and voluntary transactions
    • Figure 3: Active trading programs exist in several pollutants worldwide, yet EU-ETS remains by far the largest carbon market,with 62% of the physical market and 70% of the financial market
    • Figure 4: Non-brokered bilateral trading is losing ground to OTC and exchange-based trading
    • Figure 5: The Anglo-Dutch ECX continues to dominate formalized EU emissions trading
    • Figure 6: Market focus is shifting from an increasingly meaningless ETS Phase I towards increasingly stringent Phase II allocations
    • Figure 7: The inclusion of 85Mt of new emissions not covered in Phase 1 means that the Phase II cap has effectively been reduced by 13%
    • Figure 8: The transition from Phase I to Phase II allocations will see the current surplus of credits replaced with an EU A shortfall from 2008
    • Figure 9: The suggested EU emissions cap of 1,720Mt by 2020 presents a very challenging target, with severe implications for demand and pricing, given the aggressive Phase III limits on CDM / JI credits
    • Figure 10: The five European countries with the largest carbon abatement targets also display the largest carbon allowance deficits
    • Figure 11: Of the 5 countries that will be significantly short carbon credits in 2008, only Spain will be long on average overphases 2 and 3
    • Figure 12: EU wholesale carbon market growth
Back to Top