首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 能源 > 風力發電 > 風力發電市場的進入策略
產業/市場分類
能源 (3992)
太陽光發電 (311)
石化燃料 (895)
風力發電 (161)
核能 (83)
智慧電網 (226)
發電設備 (987)
電力市場 (381)
電池 (205)
綠色能源 (784)
燃料電池 (76)
UPS (62)
市場調查報告書

風力發電市場的進入策略

Wind Power Market Entry Strategies - build or buy?

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2008年05月 商品編碼 67032
內容資訊 英文 24 pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。

簡介

本報告書內容包括:風力發電技術、經濟、收費制度、支援制度、發電成本等調查分析、陸上風力及面海風力發電設備的優點/缺點、收益性等比較分析、英國・德國的個案研究等有助於發展有效市場進入策略的資訊等。內容綱要摘記如下:

DATAMONITOR的觀點

分析

  • 採用固定價格收購制度(feed-in tariff)的市場:最大的費用調降幅度及學習曲線
    • 雖然高價的發電機造成成本上漲,但與化石燃料相較,競爭力仍在提昇
    • 固定價格收購制度(feed-in tariff)雖然幾乎可行,但固定限額憑證制度(quota and certificate)仍不符成本
    • 支撐歐洲設備容量大幅成長需求的固定價格收購制度(feed-in tariff)
  • 風力發電成本:依賴財務及技術因素
    • 風力發電經濟:依賴4種主要參數
    • 新的或因M&A產生的風力發電計畫:風力及發電機的負載特性
    • 資金成本的影響
    • 計畫期間及折扣率:對年度發電成本影響很大
    • 差異大且不確定的O&M成本
  • 最具競爭力的投資組合:向陸上風力發電設備購買發電量的面海風力發電設備
    • 價格上漲及發電機不足的市場及審慎的進入策略
    • 風力發電設備開發:高風險・高報酬的商業活動
    • 陸上風力發電設備:4種參數最佳化後就能確保收益
    • 紙上推測面海發電的邊際效益最高,但事實上風險也可能很高
    • 與其新開發,倒不如取得價値很高的陸上風力發電設備
    • 但是可能因取得金額過高而降低投資的魅力
    • 與火力發電相較的競爭力比過去都來得高
  • 英國・德國的個案研究:只靠補助金要刺激發展進入市場策略仍嫌不足
    • 英國的固定限額憑證制度(quota and certificate):無法最大化利用投資結構・計畫許可
    • 計畫許可的課題及支援機制:現在取得既有的陸上風力發電比以往都來得有吸引力
    • 英國過去幾年內面海風力發電開發成本的上漲
    • 德國:Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) 的修正帶來創新・刺激投資機會的可能性

附錄   

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Overview

Introduction

Proliferation of climate policies are instigating long-term wind strategies split between domestically-focused wind generators and firms applying global strategies to tap major growth opportunities. In the current context of soaring turbine prices, supply bottlenecks and record wind farm valuations, carefully crafted entry strategies are key to growing profitable and competitive wind portfolios

Scope

  • Data concerning power generation costs for the five major renewable technologies and an awareness of associated subsidy systems across key markets
  • Knowledge of the key factors governing wind power economics applied to generation costs and based on realistic onshore/offshore development costs
  • Detailed insight into the cost, profitability and economic competitiveness of the three main onshore/offshore wind power market entry strategies
  • A case study assessing the likely relative profitability of different onshore/offshore wind power market entry strategies in the UK and Germany

Report Highlights

Today, wind is more competitive against fossil fuel than ever, despite higher turbine prices. The biggest price reduction of renewable technologies and learning curves are found in markets operating feed-in tariffs. This support system has delivered the most wind capacity, whereas quota and certificate mechanisms have largely underperformed

Wind power projects are front-loaded and capital intensive, therefore hardware prices and financing standards and structures have a high degree of influence on the economics of wind farming. Wind power generation costs are also highly dependent on wind conditions, turbine load factor characteristics as well as operation and maintenance costs

Onshore wind is profitable, provided that the four key parameters are optimized, with appropriate support mechanisms in place. Offshore wind, on the other hand, is a more high-risk high-reward business. Under the current market conditions, the most competitive portfolio is generally one that builds offshore but buys existing onshore wind capacity

Reasons to Purchase

  • Understand how technical, financial, regulatory and legislative factors will impact the economics of your existing and/or future wind projects
  • Evaluate the upsides and drawbacks, profitability profiles, and economic competitiveness of the main onshore/offshore wind market entry models
  • Formulate and apply successful strategies to solidify existing portfolios and expand into new global markets to unlock further competitive advantages

Table of Contents

  • DATAMONITOR VIEW
    • CATALYST
    • SUMMARY
    • SOURCES
  • ANALYSIS
    • The biggest price reduction of renewable technologies and learning curves are generated in markets operating feed-in tariffs
      • Wind is more competitive with fossil fuel than ever despite higher turbine prices pushing up the cost of wind generation
      •  Feed-in tariffs have delivered the most wind capacity whereas quota and certificate mechanisms have under performed
      • The pioneering work of successful feed-in systems has shaped the recent record growth in European installed wind capacity
    • Wind power generation costs depend on key financial and technology-specific factors
      • Wind power economics depend largely on four key sets of parameters
      • Wind farm projects, both new build and M&A, are front-loaded and capital intensive
      • Wind power generation economics are highly dependent on wind conditions and turbine load factor characteristics
      • The cost of capital, reflected in the discount or interest rate, has a high degree of influence on wind turbine development costs
      • Project lifetimes coupled with discount rate have a significant influence over the annual costs of wind power generation
      • O&M costs vary widely and can be uncertain, yet they represent a significant part of a turbine' s annual levelized generation cost
    • The most competitive portfolio is one that builds offshore but buys existing onshore wind capacity
      • In a market characterized by price increases and turbine scarcity, growing portfolios successfully calls for diligent entry strategies
      • Developing wind farms is gradually becoming a high risk high reward business
      • Onshore wind is profitable provided the four key parameters are optimized, with appropriate support mechanisms in place
      • On paper, offshore wind is high margin, however present concerns have injected high risk into offshore wind prospects
      • Acquiring onshore wind can deliver more value for money than new build development, but not at any cost
      • The high premium paid for the acquisition of offshore wind farms often makes the overall investment less attractive than new build
      • Despite recent escalating wind power generation prices,wind power has never been more competitive against thermal power
    • A case study of UK and German wind power markets reveals that the subsidy price alone is not sufficient to drive market entry strategies
      • The UK quota and certificate mechanism does not optimize wind investment structures, nor does planning permission limitations
      • Planning permission difficulties and a generous support scheme makes buying existing UK onshore wind more appealing than ever
      • UK offshore wind development costs have soared over the past few years, making the economics of such projects marginal at best
      • In Germany, proposed amendments to the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) will drive further innovation and investment
  • APPENDIX
    • Definitions
    • Ask the analyst
    • Datamonitor consulting
    • Disclaimer
  • List of Tables
    • Table 1: The three main entry strategies differ in many ways
  • List of Figures
    • Figure 1: Large scale wind is the most commercially mature renewable technology
    • Figure 2: Feed-in tariffs have delivered rapid growth in installed wind capacity in Germany and Spain
    • Figure 3: The vast majority of EU Member States operate feed-in mechanisms
    • Figure 4: Average realized wind power prices vary widely across the EU27 Member States
    • Figure 5: A recent study of 13 wind turbines shows that capital costs of wind energy projects are dominated by the cost of the actual wind turbines
    • Figure 6: Of the four main factors governing wind power economics, the most influential parameters are load factors and investment costs
    • Figure 7: A doubling of the discount factor from 5% to 10% increases the annual levelized capex costs (i.e. costs before O&M)by roughly 50%
    • Figure 8: The project lifetime that is most attractive varies with the underlying financing terms and the required annual rate of return
    • Figure 9: Typical offshore O&M costs represent 25%-40% of the total generation costs, whereas onshore typically accounts for 10%-30%
    • Figure 10: Utilities can access three main types of entry strategies to scale their wind portfolios globally
    • Figure 11: At $1m/MW, onshore wind power generation can be a high margin business
    • Figure 12: The additional cost of building offshore is rarely offset by the higher wind speeds and power generation potentials
    • Figure 13: Acquisition delivers more value than new build for prices paid up to $2.35m/MW compared to the most expensive development scenario
    • Figure 14: The hefty investment premiums paid for offshore wind typically fail to offset the time it would take offshore wind turbines to come online
    • Figure 15: As primary energy costs soar, the attraction of wind power as an generation technology with no fuel price risk has never been greater
    • Figure 16: Revenues from UK wind energy combine wholesale market price, ROC purchase price and tax incentives
    • Figure 17: At £1m/MW, buying existing onshore wind in the UK is very profitable and more appealing than new build development.
    • Figure 18: Offshore wind can however be profitable provided costs are kept low and difficulties in obtaining planning permission are overcome
    • Figure 19: The German government has proposed a reform of the EEG which provides for increased feed-in tariffs
Back to Top