|
市場調查報告書
統合公用事業企業中的網路業務
Networks and value in Integrated utilities
| 出版商 |
Datamonitor |
| 出版日期 |
2007年11月 |
商品編碼 |
57804 |
| 內容資訊 |
英文 22 pages |
| 價格 |
|
|
本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。
專門於各種的市場領域中進行調查分析的英國調查公司 Datamonitor Corporation(總公司:London) 針對統合公用事業企業中的網路業務進行調查分析,並有系統的出版綜合報告書 "Networks and value in Integrated utilities" 。
此報告書除了調查歐洲各種公用事業企業的營業收益、財務業績,還報告信用額度、股價等,除此之外並彙整了來自網路業務的收益、網路業務的有無、投注心力的程度與業績等種種指標之間的關聯性。報告書之內容構成概要如下所示。
Datamonitor的見解
分析
- 歐洲公用事業企業16間公司的分析
- 對來自網路的收益之依存性與公用事業企業規模大小並無關聯性
- 公用事業企業在平均上:收益的五分之一是來自網路
- 倚靠網路收益的公用事業企業:以瓦斯為中心
- 網路業務企業與公用事業企業全體比較起來其營業利益較高
- 從1套網路業務得來的平均營業收益為31%
- 網路業務企業的營業利益比公用事業企業全體為高
- 收益性與公用事業企業對網路所投注的心力程度之間並無一貫的關聯性
- 市場的開放程度與營業利益之間無直接關聯性
- 公用事業企業對網路所投注的心力:也有不推進信用額度與債務槓桿的情形
- 信用額度與對網路所投注的心力程度之間並無一貫的關聯性
- 債務槓桿與對網路所投注的心力程度之間並無一貫的關聯性
- 固定資產基礎與對網路所投注的心力程度之間並無一貫的關聯性
- TSO勝過ROA統合公用事業企業
- 對網路所投注的心力程度與ROSE之間有些許關聯性
- 對網路所投注的心力程度與ROA之間並無一貫的關聯性
- 對網路所投注的心力程度非常高的企業在過去5年間有ROA減少的傾向
- 對網路收入所投注的心力程度高的企業從2005年開始在ROSE方面急速成長
- TSO與平均的統合公用事業企業比較起來ROA較高
- 網路企業:股價安定但是也有因其他因素造成的負面
- RWE的股價:在整體股市中是較安定的
- EDF的股價:在整體股市中是非常安定的
附錄
圖表
Abstract
Overview
Introduction
The European Commission has indicated its preference for passage of a network
ownership unbundling directive in 2008. This potential highlights the issue of
how networks business units perform within integarted power and gas utilities,
and how valuable these business units are.
Scope
- An analysis of operating margins across a range of utilities at the level
of both networks business units and the overall utiliy.
- An assessment of financial performance at those utilities which derive the
highest proportion of their income from network assets.
- An examination of financial measures, from credit ratings to debt
leverage, that may be explained by a utility' s focus on network assets.
- A review of share price betas for utilities with different levels of
reliance on network assets.
Report Highlights
Among those utilities that publish operating information for their networks
business units, operating margins are significantly higher than for the
utility as a whole.
The average utility earns 21% of its revenue from its networks business, and
has a debt-to-equity ratio of 57%. However, there is no consistent
relationship between levels of debt leverage and the proportion of a utility' s
revenue that derive from its networks business unit.
The return on capital employed of 30 leading utilities has been declining
steadily since 2002. In contrast, utilities with a high proportion of their
revenue flowing from networks businesses saw a turnaround in return on capital
employed in 2005.
Reasons to Purchase
- Compare European utilities on the proportion of revenue and operating
income that are derived from networks business units.
- Understand how a utility' s relative focus on networks affects a range of
financial metrics.
- Challenge assumptions about the financial benefits that a focus on
networks may provide to integrated utilities.
Table of Contents
- DATAMONITOR VIEW
- ANALYSIS
- This brief analyses data from 16 leading European utilities
- Reliance on networks-derived revenue is not tied to a utility' s size
- The average utility derives one fifth of its revenues from networks
- Utilities that are most reliant on network revenue tend to be
gas-focused
- Networks businesses have higher operating margins than overall utilities
- The median operating income from a networks business unit is 31%
- The operating margin in networks businesses is higher than for
utilities overall
- There is no consistent relationship between profitability and the
proportion of a utility' s business that focuses on networks
- There is no direct relationship between the level of liberalization in
a market and operating margins in utility networks businesses
- A utility' s focus on networks does not consistently drive credit ratings
or debt leverage
- There is no consistent relationship between credit ratings and the
proportion of a utility' s business that focuses on networks
- There is no consistent relationship between debt leverage and the
proportion of a utility' s business that focuses on networks
- There is no consistent relationship between a utility' s fixed asset
base and the proportion of its business that focuses on networks
- TSOs outperform integrated utilities on ROA
- There is a loose correlation between a utility' s focus on networks and
its ROCE
- There is no relationship between a utility' s focus on networks and its
ROA
- Utilities with a particularly strong focus on networks have seen a
steady fall in ROA over the past five years
- Utilities with a strong focus on networks income have seen a sharp
increase in ROCE since 2005
- TSOs have higher returns on assets than the average integrated utility
- Networks focus reduces share price volatility, but can be eclipsed by
other factors
- National Grid' s shares are less volatile than the overall stock market
- RWE' s shares are less volatile than the overall stock market
- EDF' s shares are significantly less volatile than the overall stock
market
- E.ON' s shares are more volatile than the overall stock market
- APPENDIX
- Definitions
- Further Reading
- Datamonitor Consultancy
- Ask the analyst
- Disclaimer
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Utilities under analysis, with network business unit
definitions
- Figure 2: Network revenue as a proportion of total utility revenue,
2006
- Figure 3: Gas versus power focus of utilities, and proportion of
revenue from networks, 2006
- Figure 4: Network operating margins, 2006
- Figure 5: Whole utility versus networks business unit operating
margins, 2006
- Figure 6: Utility focus on networks and profitability, 2006
- Figure 7: MCI scores and network business unit operating margins, 2006
- Figure 8: Relationship between credit ratings and utility networks
focus, 2006
- Figure 9: Relative size of network business units and utility debt
leverage, 2006
- Figure 10: Relative size of a networks business unit and utility fixed
assets, 2006
- Figure 11: Utility focus on networks and ROCE, 2006
- Figure 12: Utility focus on networks and ROA, 2006
- Figure 13: Networks-focused utilities and ROA, 2006
- Figure 14: Networks-focused utilities and ROCE, 2006
- Figure 15: ROA for TSOs, 2006
- Figure 16: Share beta for National Grid, 2006 to Q1 2007
- Figure 17: Share beta for RWE, 2006 to Q1 2007
- Figure 18: Share beta for EDF, 2006 to Q1 2007
- Figure 19: Share beta for E.ON, 2006 to Q1 2007
|