|
市場調查報告書
決策組合：企業安全性維護企業之選擇(競爭企業的觀點）
Decision Matrix: Selecting an Enterprise Security Vendor (Competitor Focus)
|
本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。
Abstract
Overview
Introduction
This report provides a summary of the capabilities of the leading enterprise
security vendors based on a quantitative assessment of their market impact and
end user sentiment, as well as the technology features that they offer.
Datamonitor also provides guidance for enterprises looking to deploy
enterprise security solutions.
Scope
- Provides an overview of the most important trends affecting the enterprise
security market and influencing its competitive dynamics.
- Delivers an overall comparison of enterprise security vendors in terms of
their technology, user sentiment and market impact.
- Presents a detailed view of each vendor' s enterprise security offering and
capabilities, as well as advice on the suitability of these offerings.
- The report covers the following vendors: CA, Check Point, Cisco, HP, IBM,
Juniper, McAfee, Microsoft, Novell, RSA, Symantec and VeriSign.
Report Highlights
Symantec' s broad security portfolio covers all major areas of enterprise
security with the exception of I&AM. Symantec' s move towards IT systems
management, through the Veritas merger and the Altiris acquisition, places it
in a unique position to take advantage of the coming convergence between
security and systems management.
Although McAfee and Symantec have the broadest coverage of all vendors, they
are notably absent from the I&AM area, where they chose not to offer any
solutions at all. In I&AM, the dominant vendors are infrastructure vendors,
namely Novell, CA, HP and IBM.
Datamonitor considers IBM to be the leading systems management vendor and one
of the most influential infrastructure and application development vendors.
This position allows IBM to heavily influence many aspects of the security
market and the standards that govern this market.
Reasons to Purchase
- Gain detailed knowledge of enterprise security vendors' strengths with
regards to technology, user sentiment and market impact.
- Enterprise security vendors can benchmark their own performance in various
key criteria against their competitors.
- Enterprise IT managers will gain valuable insight to improve their
enterprise security purchasing decisions.
Table of Contents
- VIEW
- ANALYSIS
- Market Developments
- The scope of enterprise security solutions is rapidly changing
- An immature security threat landscape will impede the maturity of the
market
- Security will grow, but will shift away from perimeter security and
point solutions
- Security management represents the best opportunities for revenue
growth in the market
- The Enterprise Security Competitive Landscape
- The Leading Vendors
- The scope of Enterprise Security solutions
- The Enterprise Security Decision Matrix
- Symantec is the prime candidate for overall enterprise security
leadership
- McAfee has the best technology and an impressive strategy and outlook
- IBM' s strength in systems management and application development will
allow it to shape the security market
- MARKET LEADERS
- Market Leaders: Technology
- No single vendor can provide a complete security solution, but McAfee
and Symantec come close
- Vendors are clustered around I&AM, threat management and VPN &
certification
- Cisco, Juniper and Microsoft take the lead in terms of NAC technology
- Market Leaders: End-user Sentiment
- End user sentiment does not vary greatly between the top-rated vendors
- Customers are not satisfied with the levels of service, engagement and
support from security vendors
- Market Leaders: Impact
- Cisco and Symantec have the highest market impact ratings due to their
higher revenues and reach
- I&AM vendors are far ahead of the market in terms of revenue growth
- VENDOR ANALYSIS
- CA: enterprise security radars
- Check Point: enterprise security radars
- Cisco: enterprise security radars
- HP: enterprise security radars
- IBM: enterprise security radars
- Recommendation: Shortlist
- Juniper: enterprise security radars
- McAfee: enterprise security radars
- Recommendation: Shortlist
- Microsoft: enterprise security radars
- Novell: enterprise security radars
- RSA Security: enterprise security radars
- Symantec: enterprise security radars
- Recommendation: Shortlist
- VeriSign: enterprise security radars
- Other key vendors
- APPENDIX
- Definitions
- Extended methodology
- Technology
- User Sentiment
- Market Impact
- Further reading
- Ask the analyst
- Datamonitor consulting
- Disclaimer
- List of Tables
- Table 1: The Enterprise Security Decision Matrix
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: The Enterprise Security Decision Matrix
- Figure 2: Market Leaders: Technology
- Figure 3: Market Leaders analysis: end-user sentiment
- Figure 4: Market Leaders analysis: impact
- Figure 5: The CA enterprise security radars
- Figure 6: The Check Point enterprise security radars
- Figure 7: The Cisco enterprise security radars
- Figure 8: The HP enterprise security radars
- Figure 9: The IBM enterprise security radars
- Figure 10: The Juniper enterprise security radars
- Figure 11: The McAfee enterprise security radars
- Figure 12: The Microsoft enterprise security radars
- Figure 13: The Novell enterprise security radars
- Figure 14: The RSA Security enterprise security radars
- Figure 15: The Symantec enterprise security radars
- Figure 16: The VeriSign enterprise security radars
|
