首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 能源 > 歐洲做為替代性燃料的CNG(壓縮天然瓦斯)的利用情形
產業/市場分類
能源 (4001)
太陽光發電 (311)
石化燃料 (896)
風力發電 (162)
核能 (83)
智慧電網 (226)
發電設備 (993)
電力市場 (387)
電池 (205)
綠色能源 (786)
燃料電池 (76)
UPS (62)
市場調查報告書

歐洲做為替代性燃料的CNG(壓縮天然瓦斯)的利用情形

The Landscape for CNG as an Alternative Fuel

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2007年06月 商品編碼 53334
內容資訊 英文  
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。

簡介

專門於多樣市場領域之調查分析的英國市調公司 Datamonitor Corporation(總公司:London),針對歐洲做為替代性然料的CNG的利用趨勢進行相關調查分析及預測,並出版報告書 "The Landscape for CNG as an Alternative Fuel" 。

本報告書內容包括:CNG做為替代性燃料的利用趨勢、造成CNG汽車及加油站數稀少的阻礙普及因素、政治支援、全球利用趨勢、其他替代性燃料及普及趨勢等。內容綱要摘記如下:

DATAMONITOR的觀察分析

分析

  • 有限的CNG汽車及CNG加油站數量
    • 歐洲對汽車parc的NGV普及很少
    • 德國・義大利以外的地方幾乎無法利用CNG
    • 在義大利的CNG汽車及CNG加油站數量有減少的趨勢
    • 汽車及政治支援之間有很強的關聯性
  • 不能算是CNG成功市場的歐洲
    • 全球將近74%的NGV集中在主要4國
    • 巴西及阿根廷:價差及通路系統促成CNG普及
    • 巴基斯坦・中國:大規模瓦斯蘊藏量及法律規定使得CNG的利用率高
  • CNG使得其他替代燃料也普及的幾個主要原因
    • 因為技術因素變得比CNG更普遍的Autogas
    • 在歐洲的加油站,Autogas比CNG更普遍
    • 生物燃料快速擴大市場佔有率
    • 歐洲政府偏好同為替代性燃料的生物燃料
    • 生物燃料比CNG更受汽車產業的支持
    • 生物燃料比CNG更能應用在許多領域

附錄

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Overview

Introduction

Despite an increased focus on alternative road fuels across Europe, in all but one or two countries, the number of vehicles fuelled by compressed natural gas (CNG) is minimal. Industry stakeholders need to be aware of the varying popularity of CNG in member states and of the reasons for it.

Scope

  • A review of the different levels of NGVs' penetration into the European car parc and CNG' s presence within the refuelling network
  • An assessment of the support for CNG at a political level and from the automotive manufacturing industry
  • Insight into the reasons why CNG vehicles have been more popular in markets outside of Europe, including Argentina, Brazil and Pakistan
  • A comparison of the usage of competing alternative fuels such as biofuels and autogas and reasons behind success

Report Highlights

In Europe, NGVs have made the biggest impact in Italy, with the country' s 410,000 NGVs making up over 1% of the car parc. The key driver of the uptake of CNG vehicles in Italy has been grants for the purchase of NGVs and conversions kits.

The use of NGVs in Europe is dwarfed by markets such as Argentina, Brazil and Pakistan. The use of CNG in Brazil and Argentina is aided by favourable price differential between gasoline and CNG and a strong distribution infrastructure.

Across Europe CNG has been eclipsed by other alternative road fuels. Autogas has proven to be more popular for technical reasons, whilst biofuels have benefited from governmental support and superior adaptability to gasoline and diesel engines

Reasons to Purchase

  • Compare the presence of CNG across European by understanding the number of registered NGVs and the number of CNG filling stations
  • Uncover the reasons why NGVs have achieved a low penetration rate into the European car parc compared to some South American and Asian countries
  • Understand the factors behind the relative success of LPG and biofuels as alternative fuels

Table of Contents

  • DATAMONITOR VIEW
    • CATALYST
    • SUMMARY
  • ANALYSIS
    • Australian States continue to exhibit amongst the world' s highest levels of customer switching and churn
      • South Australia and Victoria lead the way in customer switching in Australia
      • Globally South Australia and Victoria have comparable switching rates to highly competitive markets such as the UK
      • Switching and churn rates have been shaped by markedly different market conditions across the competitive States
        • Rising regulated retail prices
        • Dual fuel offerings
        • Aggressive new entrants
      • Wholesale prices are expected to have a major influence on near-term acquisition strategies
    • Driving customer switching - results from an Australian household customer survey
      • Customers want lower prices and other financial incentives, but convenience of dual fuel also key
      • Retailer representatives are core to facilitating switching
      • But with one quarter of switchers considering switching again, having won the customer the focus needs to turn to retention
      • Convincing non-switchers increasingly means reducing the inconvenience of switching supplier
      • Green energy and customer service levels more influential for non-switchers, but price still key
      • In targeting customers in the future, telemarketing is, and will remain, unpopular
    • Expectations for retail competition in Queensland
      • Full retail competition in Queensland commencing on 1 July
      • Consumers keen to seek out a cheaper deal
      • But high wholesale prices will hinder new entrants' discounting
  • ACTIONS
    • Driving customer acquisition
      • Dual fuel offers are the most attractive non-financial inducement to switch
      • Door-to-door by far the most effective method and forecast to continue to be so
      • Inconvenience as a key factor behind non-switching
      • Green energy at no extra cost a key factor for non-switchers
    • Penetrating the newly opened Queensland market
      • South-east Queensland expected to see most intense competition, but stifled by wholesale prices
  • APPENDIX
    • Definitions
    • Methodology
    • Further reading
    • Sources and relevant links
    • Ask the analyst
    • Datamonitor consulting
    • Disclaimer
    • List of Tables
      • Table 1: On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being irrelevant and 5 being critical, how important/influential were the following in your decision to switch electricity supplier
      • Table 2: Average rating of importance/influence of incentives to switch electricity supplier - by State
      • Table 3: For the most recent switch, which of the following were sources of information (tick all that apply)
      • Table 4: What channel initiated your most recent switch to the new supplier (please choose one)
      • Table 5: When would you consider switching again?
      • Table 6: If you did not switch, what were the main reasons (tick all that apply) - State
      • Table 7: How important/influential would the following be in your decision to switch supplier in the future? Please rate 1 - 5 where 1 = irrelevant and 5 = critical
      • Table 8: Through which of the following channels would you be willing to be contacted by retailers with regards to future offers (Tick all that apply)
      • Table 9: Through which of the following channels would you be willing to be contacted by retailers with regards to future offers (Tick all that apply) - by State
      • Table 10: Through which of the following channels would you be willing to be contacted by retailers with regards to future offers (Tick all that apply) - by State
      • Table 11: Full retail contestability will be coming to Queensland in July 2007. Which of the following statements best fits your intentions
      • Table 12: Survey sample by State
    • List of Figures
      • Figure 1: Switching rates in the Victorian, NSW and South Australian power markets - small consumers, 2003-2007
      • Figure 2: On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being irrelevant and 5 being critical, how important/influential were the following in your decision to switch electricity supplier
      • Figure 3: Average rating of importance/influence of incentives to switch electricity supplier - by State
      • Figure 4: Channels used to initiate switching by State (VIC, NSW and SA)
      • Figure 5: If you did not switch, what were the main reasons (tick all that apply)
      • Figure 6: What is the likelihood that you would switch for a 10% saving?
Back to Top