首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 能源 > 電力市場 > 歐洲公共事業國營企業的未來發展
產業/市場分類
能源 (4001)
太陽光發電 (311)
石化燃料 (896)
風力發電 (162)
核能 (83)
智慧電網 (226)
發電設備 (993)
電力市場 (387)
電池 (205)
綠色能源 (786)
燃料電池 (76)
UPS (62)
市場調查報告書

歐洲公共事業國營企業的未來發展

Company Graphics: The Future of State-owned Utilities

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2007年03月 商品編碼 50786
內容資訊 英文  
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。

簡介

專門於多樣市場領域之調查分析的英國市調公司 Datamonitor Corporation(總公司:London),針對歐洲公共事業國營企業的未來發展進行相關調查分析及預測,並出版報告書 "Company Graphics: The Future of State-owned Utilities" 。

本報告書內容包括:歐洲公共事業國營企業的發電量及電力・瓦斯消費量的占有率、收益成長等營運・財務資料、公共事業國營企業的各種策略、與公共事業民營企業的比較等。內容綱要摘記如下:

分析

  • 既有國營能源企業的相似度
    • 各國的持有水準
    • 公共事業國營企業主要致力於發電・電力銷售方面
    • 雖擅長於核能發電領域,但可再生能源及瓦斯領域的發展落後
  • 在國内市場擁有影響力的公共事業國營企業
    • 專攻電力・瓦斯領域的國營企業獨占國内市場
    • 國營公共事業企業的能源量成長帶來收益成長
  • 受到自由化的影響,需要排除事業經營中沒有效率的地方
    • 大幅利益成長無法創造大幅的現金流成長
    • 民營企業的員工效率較高
    • 隨著國内競爭激烈化,既有的國營企業逐漸流失在電力・瓦斯市場中的占有率
  • 國營公共事業企業:以國内市場中的優勢為基礎,繼續加強其在競爭上的地位
    • 與民營企業相比債務較少的國營公共事業
    • 不容易受到批發電力市場中變化影響的國營企業
    • 容易受到批發瓦斯市場中變化影響的國營企業和民營企業
  • 為了強化長期的競爭力,應適應變化中的能源市場環境
    • 在自由化腳步加快、競爭激烈的情況當中M&A活動增加
    • 國營公共事業應評估法規限制上及政治上的風險
    • 被要求擴大可再生能源比例的國營公共事業
    • 從國營事業分出獨立的情況增加

附錄

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Overview

Introduction

State-owned energy utilities have a substantial presence in European energy markets. By analyzing the operational and financial data of leading state-owned European energy utilities, it is possible to understand how they will fare in a post-liberalised European energy landscape.

Scope

  • Insight and analysis of key operational and financial data of major European state-owned energy utilities.
  • A projection of how European state-owned energy utilities will evolve and and become more competitive.
  • A comparison of the performance and characteristics of private and state-owned European utilities.

Report Highlights

Spanish state incumbents will face heavy competitive pressure as Spanish retail switching rates are highest for both residential and non-residential gas customers.

State-owned energy utilites dominate their domestic markets, posting higher than average profit margins and energy volume return than privately-owned utilities.

State-owned utilities have a lower power net trade requirement (7% of power supply) than the privately owned utilities (12%), reflecting a higher level of vertical integration.

Reasons to Purchase

  • Gain valuable insight into how state-owned utilities compare against privately owned utilities.
  • Understand the strategies available to state-owned utilities to navigate the competitive European energy landscape.
  • Understand how state-ownership impacts utility operations.

Table of Contents

  • CATALYST
  • SUMMARY
  • ANALYSIS
    • State energy incumbents are similar except in the degree of state ownership
      • The sample of utilities are taken from Datamonitor' s Key Player data
      • The level of state ownership in energy utilities is varied
      • Without exception, the state-owned utilities are all vertically integrated
      • State-owned utilities are mainly focused on power generation and sales
      • State-owned utilities dominate in nuclear generation, but lag in renewable and gas capacity
    • State-owned utilities are dominant in their domestic markets
      • Power focused state-owned utilities dominate their domestic markets
      • Gas focused state-owned utilities dominate their domestic markets
      • Energy volume growth generates extremely high income growth in state-owned utilities
      • State-owned utilities post above average profit margins and energy volume returns
    • In order to weather liberalisation, business inefficiencies need to be reduced
      • The high income growth of state utilities does not generate high cash flow growth
      • Employee efficiency is on average higher in privately owned utilities
      • As domestic competition intensifies, state incumbents will lose power market share
      • As domestic competition intensifies, state incumbents will lose gas market share
    • State-owned utilities' home advantage can be a springboard to enhancing their competitive position
      • State-owned utilities are on average less leveraged than their privately-owned counterparts
      • Private utilities are more exposed to changes in wholesale power markets
      • Both state-owned and privately-owned utilities are highly exposed to wholesale gas markets
    • State-owned utilities are adapting to changing energy market conditions to become more competitive in the longer term
      • As liberalisation gains momentum and competition intensifies, merger and acquisition activity will increase substantially
      • State-owned utilities must navigate both regulatory and political risk
      • State-owned utilities will be pressured to increase the share of renewable energy in their product portfolios
      • The rate of divesture from state-owned utilities will increase
  • APPENDIX
    • Definitions
    • Further Reading
    • Ask the Analyst
    • List of Figures
      • Figure 1: European leading utilities key players
      • Figure 2: The level of state ownership in energy utilities is varied
      • Figure 3: State-owned utilities are all vertically integrated (bundled), controlling distribution and transportation/transmission networks
      • Figure 4: State-owned utilities are mainly focused on power generation and sales
      • Figure 5: 2005 Generation capacity - MW
      • Figure 6: 2005 Power market share and national consumption
      • Figure 7: 2005 Gas market share and national consumption
      • Figure 8: 2004-2005 Energy volume and net income growth
      • Figure 9: 2005 Operating power margin and return on energy volumes
      • Figure 10: 2004-2005 Net income and operating cash flow growth
      • Figure 11: Employee efficiency measured by operating profits
      • Figure 12: July 2008 Power switching rates
      • Figure 13: July 2008 Gas switching rates
      • Figure 14: 2005 Debt leverage
      • Figure 15: 2005 Power net trade requirement as a proportion of overall power volume
      • Figure 16: 2005 Gas net trade requirement as a proportion of overall gas volume
Back to Top