首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 環境 > CO2 降低 > 歐洲的二氧化碳捕獲與封存概要
產業/市場分類
環境 (633)
水處理 (211)
隔膜技術 (69)
環境趨勢 (202)
CO2 降低 (81)
市場調查報告書

歐洲的二氧化碳捕獲與封存概要

Overview of Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2011年08月 商品編碼 210001
內容資訊 英文 Pages: 53
價格
US $ 2900 PDF by E-mail (Single user license)
US $ 7250 PDF by E-mail (Global license)


歐洲的二氧化碳捕獲與封存概要 是由出版商Datamonitor在2011年08月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含Pages: 53 價格從美金2900起跳。

簡介

本報告提供歐洲的二氧化碳捕獲·儲存(CCS)各方面的驗證,主要企劃概要,資金來源,法律環境,經濟,以及市場規模與未來預測等,為您概述為以下內容。

概要

摘要整理

大型整合企劃的現狀和歐洲的主要企業

  • 衰弱的經濟表現,法律的不確定性,民眾的反對造成許多計畫延誤和取消,但進度仍然正在進行
    • 產業,技術,各區域劃分
  • 燃燒後的捕獲,開發平台,地質學的封存技術

資金籌措與探倡議

  • EU及英國的資金籌措計劃處於停頓狀態
    • 英國的CCS實證的競爭
    • EU的NER300最新趨勢
    • 研究·技術開發的第7次架構計劃
    • 其他的活動
    • 國際資金籌措與 研究倡議
  • 私營部門有能力提供資金,只有這樣做,預測風險調整後的淨現值才會為正

法律及風險回顧

  • 法律及風險環境雖然正在發展,但同樣仍然存在不確定性風險
    • 風險
    • 二氧化碳的地質學相關封存EU指令2009/31/EC
  • 英國的電力市場改革促進對CCS的投資,也提出需要足夠穩定性的價格

CCS的經濟實行可能性

  • 二氧化碳的價格推動發展CCS未來成本
    • 未來的成本
    • 經營模式

未來預測

  • 對歐洲的二氧化碳捕獲設備製造商來說,2020年為止的收益價值為150∼170億美元
  • 許多新技術預計將出現
  • 輕鬆導出的知識服務是英國價值鏈中獲得利潤最多的領域
  • 整體二氧化碳的價格雖然不能完全促進CCS的開發,但政府的支援可以讓CCS在2025年為止充分實行

附錄

圖表

目錄

Description

Introduction

This brief analyzes the carbon capture and storage industry in the UK and Europe from various angles, examining the key drivers, issues, trends, players, and costs. Using a range of sources supplemented with unique insight from industry experts, it joins the dots to provide an informative and compelling overview of the CCS industry, and is imperative reading for strategic decision makers.

Features And Benefits

• Segments the large-scale integrated projects by various angles, such as by application type, capture type, and country.
• Highlights the key players and projects.
• Provides an overview of the different funding sources and the legal/risk landscape, highlighting their respective problems.
• Provides detailed insight into the economics of CCS, with cost breakdowns sourced from highly reputable organizations.
• Gives an estimate of the market size and future outlook.

Highlights

Overall, the carbon price is too low to incentivize the development of CCS, and so its development is carried forward by the aid of slow-paced government support, which will hopefully enable the economics of CCS to converge with the long-run estimates of the carbon price, by around 2025.

Your Key Questions Answered

• What is the current status of large-scale integrated CCS projects, by industry, technology, and region?
• Who are the key players and what are the key projects?
• What is the funding and legal/risk landscape, and what are their associated issues?
• What is the cost breakdown of CCS, segmented by location and capture type as well?
• What is the future outlook, including novel technologies, market size forecasts, where to enter the UK value chain, and what does it all depend upon?

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Weak economic performance, legislative uncertainty, and public opposition have caused many delays and cancellations to projects, but progress is still being made
Post-combustion capture, pipelines, and deep saline aquifer methods dominate
EU and UK funding programs are making slow progress, but progress all the same
The legal and risk landscape is developing, but again uncertainties remain
Carbon price estimates fall short of the price needed to spur the development of CCS
For European carbon capture equipment manufacturers, there is approximately $15 - 17bn worth of revenue potential to 2020
Easily exportable knowledge services appear the most lucrative section of the UK' s value chain
Overall, the carbon price is not high enough to incentivize the development of CCS; however, it is being carried forward by government support, and is expected to be fully viable by 2025
OVERVIEW
Catalyst

Summary

Methodology
CURRENT STATUS OF LARGE-SCALE INTEGRATED PROJECTS AND PLAYERS IN EUROPE
Weak economic performance, legislative uncertainty, and public opposition have caused many delays and cancellations, but progress is still being made
Breakdown by industry, technology, and region
Post-combustion capture, pipelines, and geological storage technologies dominate
Alstom Power
Siemens Power
Doosan Power Systems
GE
Hitachi Power Europe
Country-by-country overview of projects and statuses
FUNDING AND RESEARCH INITIATIVES
EU and UK funding programs are making slow progress, but progress all the same
UK CCS demonstration competitions
EU NER300 update
Seventh Framework Program for Research and Technological Development
Other funding and research activities
International funding and research initiatives
The private sector has the ability to fund, but will only do so when the forecast risk-adjusted net present values are positive
LEGAL AND RISK OVERVIEW
The legal and risk landscape is developing, but again uncertainties remain
Risk
EU Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide
The proposed UK electricity market reforms imply a floor carbon price not high enough to incentivize investment in CCS
THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF CCS
Carbon price estimates fall short of the price needed to spur the development of CCS
Future costs
Business models
THE FUTURE OUTLOOK
For European carbon capture equipment manufacturers, there is approximately $15 - 17bn worth of revenue potential to 2020
Market size
Many exciting novel technologies are on the horizon
Easily exportable knowledge services appear the most lucrative section of the UK' s value chain
Supply chain opportunities
Overall, the carbon price is not high enough to incentivize the development of CCS; however, it is being carried forward by government support, and is expected to be fully viable by 2025

Appendix

What is CCS?
Carbon capture can occur pre-combustion, post-combustion, and in oxyfuel combustion
The transportation of CO2 is similar to that of natural gas and employs mature and commercially available technologies
There are currently three ways to store CO2, but geological formations are considered the most promising sequestration sites
The road to 2050

Definitions

Bibliography
Further reading
Ask the analyst
Datamonitor consulting
Disclaimer
Back to Top