首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 製藥企業 > 大型製藥公司的大型合併:1995∼2014年
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4816)
肥胖症治療 (44)
非專利藥 (129)
疫苗 (181)
神經疾病 (172)
骨頭疾病治療 (37)
動物用醫藥 (17)
處方藥 (156)
規章 (126)
感染疾病 (346)
精神病 (84)
製藥企業 (524)
糖尿病 (191)
癌症 (909)
藥物開發 (1449)
DDS (182)
OTC 非處方藥 (150)
市場調查報告書

大型製藥公司的大型合併:1995∼2014年

Big Pharma Mega-Mergers 1995-2014

出版商 Datamonitor
出版日期 2009年12月 商品編碼 105430
內容資訊 英文 Pages: 114
價格
US $ 7600 PDF & PowerPoint by E-mail (Single user license)
US $ 19000 PDF & PowerPoint by E-mail (Global license)


大型製藥公司的大型合併:1995∼2014年 是由出版商Datamonitor在2009年12月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含Pages: 114 價格從美金7600起跳。

簡介

1995∼2014年期間,大型製藥公司的處方藥的銷售額從840億美元擴大到3810億美元。其3/2(63%)為M&A的處方藥。大型合併(交易額為50億美元以上的M&A)以醫藥品業界的長期戰略來看,在企業構造改革上擔任極具重要使命。

報告書內容包括﹕1995∼2014年所執行的22大型M&A相關分析,對銷售實績帶來的影響和成長度、各家戰略相關檢證。概要內容如下﹕

序論

摘要

大型製藥公司的M&A活動:1995∼2014年

  • 主要的調查結果
  • 大型製藥公司的M&A動向:1995∼2009年
  • M&A成為1995∼2014年銷售額擴大的最大源頭

各企業1995∼2014年的市場分析

  • 主要的調查結果
  • M&A成長戦略各家企業分類
  • 『購買成長力』企業
    • Roche-Genentech
    • Johnson & Johnson
    • Abbott-Solvay
  • 『購買規模』企業
    • Merck-Schering-Plough
    • GlaxoSmithKline
    • Sanofi Aventis
    • AstraZeneca
    • Bayer AG
  • 複合M&A
    • Pfizer-Wyeth
    • Novartis
  • 有機成長企業
    • Eli Lilly
    • Brtistol-Myers Squibb

成長、規模、有機的戦略之財政影響

  • 主要的調查結果
  • 序論
  • 金融市場和股市分析研究概要
  • 利潤
  • 資本回轉率
  • 資本投資回收率
  • 市場的資本化

附錄

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Introduction

Mega-mergers (defined here as M&A events with deal sizes >$5bn) have been a long-term strategic feature of the pharmaceutical industry and have played a key role in shaping the structure and composition of today' s leading companies. Is it possible to quantify exactly how much of Big Pharma' s sales growth has been driven by M&A versus how much has been self-produced through organic growth?

Scope of this research

  • This report analyzes 22 large scale M&A events that have occurred to date within the Big Pharma peer set over the period 1995-2014
  • Datamonitor has identified two distinct classes of M&A event: small/fast growth acquisitions and big/slow growth acquisitions.
  • Using these two classes Datamonitor has identified three company-level M&A growth strategies that can be attributed to each of the Big Pharma players:
  • In addition to the impact of mega-M&A on sales performance the report also assesses the financial implications associated with different M&A strategies

Research and analysis highlights

Twenty-two large-scale M&A events (defined as those valued above $5 billion) have occurred within Big Pharma over 19952014. Furthermore, every Big Pharma player has undertaken large scale M&A activity at some stage over this period, thereby illustrating it as an ingrained peer set strategy.

Over the period 19952014, Big Pharma prescription pharmaceutical sales are forecast to increase from $84 billion to $381 billion, with absolute growth of +$187 billion provided by M&A activity. In other words, two-thirds (c.63%) of Big Pharma sales expansion over a 20-year period will be driven entirely by M&A activity.

Key reasons to purchase this research

  • Assess how much of Big Pharma' s sales growth over 1995-2014 will be driven by M&A versus how much will be self-produced through organic growth.
  • Assess how Datamonitor has classified each of the current Big Pharma players by their dominant M&A growth strategy
  • Analyze the M&A and organic sales growth profiles for each Big Pharma company over the period 1995-2014

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

  • Scope of analysis
    • Methodology
    • Company coverage
  • Data sources
    • Re-creating analysis from this report using PharmaVitae Explorer queries
  • Further reading

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • Key findings
  • M&A is the dominant form of Big Pharma sales growth over 1995 - 2014
    • M&A has allowed Big Pharma sales growth rate to keep pace with overall market...
    • ...while maintaining Big Pharma' s overall market share
  • Since 1995, 22 large scale M&A events have occurred within Big Pharma
    • Acquirer/target company overview
  • The 22 M&A events can be classified by scale and growth performance
    • Only three M&A events have delivered fast growth performance over subsequent five year period
    • All fast growth acquisitions share mAb-access characteristic
    • Roche' s acquisition of Genentech has delivered most sustainable revenue growth
    • Only access to high-growth statins lifts large-scale acquisitions above flat growth threshold
    • Oncology mAbs to replace statins as leading product type in Rx market
    • Flat growth for recently acquired Big Pharma companies illustrates that M&A will be insufficient to offset patent cliff decline but scale growth remains imperative
    • Sales growth potential of large M&A events further diminished by demise of blockbuster growth model
    • Big Pharma R&D has been unable to keep pace with the acceleration in blockbuster growth driven by M&A
  • M&A event types illustrate fundamentally different company growth strategies
    • Big Pharma players who primarily use M&A to ‘buy growth'
    • Big Pharma players who primarily use M&A to ‘buy scale'
    • Big Pharma players who have engaged in >2 mega mergers: ‘multi M&A'
    • Big Pharma players who have primarily avoided mega mergers and stayed ‘organic'
  • Financial performance implications by M&A growth strategy type

BIG PHARMA M&A ACTIVITY, 1995-2014

  • Key findings
  • Big Pharma M&A timeline 1995-2009
  • M&A is the dominant source of Big Pharma sales growth over 1995-2014
    • M&A has allowed Big Pharma sales growth rate to keep pace with overall market...
    • ...while maintaining Big Pharma' s overall market share
    • Increased scale has driven an expansion of blockbuster portfolios...
    • ...but M&A will not allow Big Pharma to scale the patent cliff
    • Year-on-year growth analysis illustrates growing influence of M&A but also severity of patent cliff
    • Big Pharma M&A dependency analysis
    • Company-level market share analysis

M&A ANALYSIS 1995-2014 BY COMPANY

  • Key findings
  • Classification of companies by M&A growth strategy
  • ‘Buy Growth' players
    • Roche-Genentech
    • Johnson & Johnson
    • Abbott-Solvay
  • ‘Buy Scale' players
    • Merck-Schering-Plough
    • GlaxoSmithKline
    • Sanofi Aventis
    • AstraZeneca
    • Bayer AG
  • Multi-M&A players
    • Pfizer-Wyeth
    • Novartis
  • Organic growth players
    • Eli Lilly
    • Bristol-Myers Squibb

FINACIAL CONSEQUENCES OF GROWTH, SCALE & ORGANIC STRATEGIES

  • Key findings
  • Introduction
  • Overview of financial and stock market analysis approach
  • Profit margin (EBIT / Total revenues)
  • Capital turnover (total revenues / capital employed)
  • Return on capital employed (EBIT / capital employed)
  • Market capitalization

APPENDIX

  • Methodology
    • Framework for analyzing Big Pharma M&A events over 1995-2014
  • Abbreviations
  • Exchange rates

TABLES

  • Table: Company coverage
  • Table: Big Pharma M&A timeline and overview, 1995 - 2014
  • Table: Big Pharma M&A timeline and overview, 1995 - 2014
  • Table: Example of RootCo a DestCo growth
  • Table: Exchange rates, 2009

FIGURES

  • Figure: The PharmaVitae Explorer
  • Figure: Big Pharma Rx pharmaceutical sales ($m) by source, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma Rx pharmaceutical absolute sales growth ($m) by source, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Rx sales CAGR (%) for total market & Big Pharma peer set, 1995 - 2008 & 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma share (%)of total Rx pharmaceutical market by organic/M&A sales, 1995 - 2008
  • Figure: Lineage of companies with one round of M&A activity
  • Figure: Lineage of companies with two rounds of M&A activity
  • Figure: Lineage of companies with more than two rounds of M&A activity
  • Figure: Scatter chart analysis of acquired companies, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma M&A events classified by % relative size of target company by acquiring company & % CAGR of target company (five years post-M&A)
  • Figure: Re-based absolute growth & total Rx revenue performance of Centocor, Knoll and Genentech, 13/19-year post-M&A period ($m)
  • Figure: Grouped Big Pharma M&A events classified by % relative size of target company by acquiring company & % CAGR of target company (5 years post-M&A)
  • Figure: Global Lipitor and Crestor sales ($m), 2001 - 14
  • Figure: Global sales ($m) of statins (C10A1) and oncology-mAbs (L1X3), 2001 - 14
  • Figure: Big Pharma blockbuster Rx sales ($m), 2001 - 14
  • Figure: Classification of Big Pharma companies by M&A growth strategy
  • Figure: Big Pharma companies classified by M&A growth strategy (by % CAGR of target company [five years post-M&A] and % of total growth due to M&A)
  • Figure: Big Pharma Rx pharmaceutical sales by source ($m), 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma Rx pharmaceutical absolute sales growth by source ($m), 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Rx sales CAGR (%) for total market & Big Pharma peer set, 1995 - 2008 & 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma share (%) of total Rx pharmaceutical market by organic and M&A sales, 1995 - 2008
  • Figure: Big Pharma blockbuster Rx sales ($m), 2001 - 14
  • Figure: Big Pharma absolute Rx sales growth ($m) by source and time period, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Big Pharma year-on-year absolute Rx sales growth ($m) by source, 1996 - 2014
  • Figure: Percentage of absolute Rx sales growth by source, 1995-2014 (%)
  • Figure: Market share (%) analysis by Big Pharma company, 1995 - 2008
  • Figure: Classification of Big Pharma companies by M&A growth strategy
  • Figure: Roche absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Roche Rx revenues by acquired company, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Roche year-on-year absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Roche acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Johnson & Johnson absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Johnson & Johnson Rx revenues by acquired company, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Johnson & Johnson year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Johnson & Johnson acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Abbott absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Abbott Rx revenues by acquired company ($m), 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Abbott year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Abbott acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Merck & Co. absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Merck & Co. Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Merck & Co. year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Merck & Co. acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: GlaxoSmithKline absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: GlaxoSmithKline Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: GlaxoSmithKline year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: GlaxoSmithKline acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Sanofi-Aventis absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Sanofi-Aventis Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Sanofi-Aventis year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Sanofi-Aventis acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: AstraZeneca absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: AstraZeneca Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: AstraZeneca year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: AstraZeneca acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Bayer-Schering absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Bayer-Schering Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Bayer-Schering year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Bayer-Schering acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Pfizer absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Pfizer Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Pfizer year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Pfizer acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Novartis absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Novartis Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Novartis year-on-year absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Novartis acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Eli Lilly absolute growth ($m) by organic/M&A, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Eli Lilly Rx revenues ($m) by acquired company, 1995 - 2014
  • Figure: Eli Lilly year-on-year absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Eli Lilly acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Bristol-Myers Squibb absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Bristol-Myers Squibb Rx revenues by acquired company, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Bristol-Myers Squibb year-on-year absolute growth by organic/M&A, 1995-2014 ($m)
  • Figure: Bristol-Myers Squibb acquired company Rx revenues rebased as % of organic Rx revenues at year of acquisition
  • Figure: Return on capital employed formula
  • Figure: % EBIT / total revenues and % operating costs / total revenues, 2004 - 08 (weighted three-company average for Growth, Scale and Organic company sets)
  • Figure: Total revenues / capital employed and % goodwill & intangibles / total revenues, 2004 - 08 (weighted three-company average for Growth, Scale and Organic company sets)
  • Figure: EBIT / capital employed build-up from EBIT margin and capital turnover, 2004 - 08 (weighted three-company average for Growth, Scale and Organic company sets)
  • Figure: Market capitalization (indexed Jan 2005), 2005 - 08 (weighted three-company average for Growth, Scale and Organic company sets 2005-09)
  • Figure: Evolutionary timeline for theoretical company ‘RootCo'
  • Figure: Theoretical sales performance for RootCo + Targ1Co & Targ2Co
  • Figure: Disaggregation of sales growth in organic and M&A components
Back to Top