|
市場調查報告書
第4階段試驗:市場銷售後調查的管理架構、策略、及基準評價
Mastering Phase IV Clinical Trials
|
本報告已在2011年07月26日停止出版。
第4階段試驗是目前發展最為快速的領域。一般認為該領域將以每年23%的速度成長 ,而產業投資也將在2007年達到120億美金。
專門提供製藥產業創新實用的調查及顧問服務的市調公司 Cutting Edge Information(總公司:美國北卡羅萊那州),調查與分析第4階段試驗的動向,並有系統地出版綜合報告書"Phase IV Clinical Trials: Post-Marketing Study Management Structure, Strategy, & Benchmarks" 。
此報告書使用152頁的篇幅,針對第4階段試驗的概要與研究策略、時間表與活動、及表現指標與管理等,進行一連串地探討。此報告書的概略架構如下所示。
摘要
- 調查方法與定義
- 已建檔的企業與治療領域
- 第4階段試驗:結論與建言
研究管理架構、概要及策略
第4階段試驗的時間表、活動、及表現指標
- 市場銷售後的試驗時間表
- 市場銷售後的試驗活動
- 表現評價
預算、人員配置、及委外
封面圖片:
Abstract
Enhance Your Post-Marketing Trials:
Phase 4 is the fastest-growing area of clinical research today. At an annual
growth rate of 23%, industry investment in post-marketing research is expected
to top $12 billion in 2007. Rampant growth in Phase 4 research should come as
no surprise, however. A changing regulatory environment, growing concerns
about the safety of new medicines, and various uses for large-scale,
real-world data on marketed drugs' safety and efficacy are primary drivers of
the growth seen in the Phase 4 research environment today. Post-marketing
research is an important element of commercialization that enables companies
to expand existing markets, enter new markets, develop and deliver messaging
that directly compares their products with the competition, and secure a niche
position in crowded markets. What' s more, payer groups and regulators are both
requiring more post-marketing data from drug companies.
Given the increasing importance of post-marketing research, continued growth
expected for Phase 4 trials, and mounting competitive pressures, it is
critical for companies to make full use of the information and data available
to them. Phase IV Clinical Trials: Post-Marketing Study Management Structure,
Strategy, and Benchmarks is a comprehensive post-marketing study management
tool designed to provide industry executives with benchmark data and best
practice information to inform key strategic and operational decisions in the
areas of Phase 4:
- Trial management structure and oversight
- Research strategy
- Study design and execution
- Study timelines and cycle times
- Performance metrics and management
- Operational activities
- Trial budgeting and outsourcing
- Trial staffing
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
- Study Methodology and Definifions
- Profiled Companies and Therapeufic Areas
- Phase 4 Clinical Trials: Conclusions and Recommendations
Study Management Structure, Oversight and Strategy
- Phase 4 Study Management Structure
- Developing a Phase 4 Strategy
Phase 4 Trial timelines, Activities and Performance Metrics
- Post-Marketing Trial timelines
- Post-Marketing Trial Activities
- Performance Measurement
Budgets, Statfing and Outsourcing
- Phase 4 Study Budgets and Outsourcing
- Phase 4 Trial Stafing
CHARTS & GRAPHICS
Executive Summary
- Figure E.1: Percentage of Phase 4 Clinical Trial Budgets Outsourced, by
Therapeutic Area
- Figure E.2: Percentage of Phase 4 Studies for Which Survey Respondents
Submitted
- ASRs to FDA, 2005 and 2006
Study Management Sfructure. Oversight and Strategy
- Phase 4 Study Management Structure
- Figure 1.1: Phase 4 Study Management Structure
- Figure 1.2: Phase 4 Study Management Structure by Company Size
- Figure 1.3: Company 7' s Phase 4 Management Structure
- Figure 1.4: Company 12' s Phase 4 Management Structure
- Figure 1.5: Total Number of Patients per Therapeutic Area
- Figure 1.6: Average Number of Patients per Therapeutic Area Trial by
Company Size
- Figure 1.7: Number of Patients per Site
- Figure 1.8: Average Number of Patients per Site by Company Size
- Figure 1.9: Percentage of In-House Phase 4 Infrastructures
- Figure 1.10: Percentage of In-House Phase 4 Infrastructures by Company
Size
- Figure 1.11: Percentage of Companies that Outsource Phase 4 Activities
- Figure 1.12: Percentage of Companies that Outsource Phase 4 Activities
by Company Size
- Developing a Phase 4 Strategy
- Figure 1.13: Motivation for Conducting Phase 4 Studies
- Figure 1.14: Average Number of Active Studies Per Motivation Category
- Figure 1.15: Number of Active Phase 4 Studies by Company
- Figure 1.16: Number of Active Phase 4 Studies Per Marketed Product by
Company
- Figure 1.17: Average Number of Active Phase 4 Studies Per Marketed
Product by Company Size
- Figure 1.18: Percentage Breakdown for Phase 4 Motivation by Company Size
- Figure 1.19: Average Number of Active Phase 4 Trials by Motivation and
Company Size
- Figure 1.20: Number of Active Phase 4 Studies Per Small Company
- Figure 1.21: Number of Active Phase 4 Studies Per Mid-Size Company
- Figure 1.22: Number of Active Phase 4 Studies Per Large Company
- Figure 1.23: Key Motivating Factors for Conducting Phase 4 Studies
- Figure 1.24: Functional Oversight of Phase 4 Study Strategy
- Figure 1.25: Functional Oversight of Phase 4 Study Strategy by Company
Size
- Figure 1.26: Participants' Self-Asse ssm e n ts of Study Pla nn ing and
Design
- Figure 1.27: Functional Oversight of Phase 4 Study Execution
- Figure 1.28: Functional Oversight of Phase 4 Study Strategy by Company
Size
- Figure 1.29: Participants' Self-Assessments of Study Execution
- Table 1.1: Participating Companies' Phase 4 Study Challenges
Phase 4 Trial Timelines, Activities and Performance Metrics
- Post-Marketing Trial Timelines
- Figure 2.1: Percentage of NDAs with At Least One Post-Marketing Study C
o m m itm e nt
- Table 2.1: Post-Marketing Study Commitments (September 2005, FDA Federal
Register)
- Table 2.2: Post-Marketing Study Commitments from Fiscal Years 1990-2004
- Figure 2.2: Products with Post-Marketing Studies Conducted
- Figure 2.3: Products with Post-Marketing Studies Conducted by Company
Size
- Figure 2.4: Phase 4 Studies Initiated by All Surveyed Companies
- Figure 2.5: Phase 4 Studies Initiated by Small Companies
- Figure 2.6: Phase 4 Studies Initiated by Mid -Size Companies
- Figure 2.7: Phase 4 Studies Initiated by Large Companies
- Figure 2.8: Phase 4 Average & Projected Trial Duration
- Figure 2.9: Percentage of Da ys Be yo nd Average Phase 4 Trial D ura tio
n
- Figure 2.10: Company Sponsored vs. Investigator Sponsored Post-Marketing
US Studies
- Post-Marketing Trial Activities
- Figure 2.11: Percentage s of Tim e Consumed by Trial Activities: Overall
Average
- Figure 2.12: Percentage s of Tim e Consumed by Trial Activities: Small
Companies
- Figure 2.13: Percentage s of Tim e Consumed by Trial Activities:
Mid-Size Companies
- Figure 2.14: Percentage s of Tim e Consumed by Trial Activities: Large
Companies
- Figure 2.15: Opportunities for Trial Acceleration : Overall Average
- Figure 2.16: Opportunities for Trial Acceleration : Small Companies
- Figure 2.17: Opportunities for Trial Acceleration : Mid-Size Companies
- Figure 2.18: Opportunities for Trial Acceleration : Large Companies
- Figure 2.19: Overall Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: All Activities
- Figure 2.20: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Study Design &
Concept Development
- Figure 2.21: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Protocol
Development/W riting
- Figure 2.22: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Site Selection
/Enrollment/Contracting
- Figure 2.23: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Patient Enrollment
- Figure 2.24: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: CRO /Vendor Protocol
- Figure 2.25: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: CRO /Vendor
Contracting
- Figure 2.26: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Data Collection &
Cleaning
- Figure 2.27: Performance Measurement Self-Ratings: Statistical Analysis
- Performance Measurement
- Figure 2.28: Self-Ratings: Measuring Performance
- Figure 2.29: Self-Ratings: Using Performance Measurement to Effect
Organizational Change
- Figure 2.30: Self-Ratings: Measuring Performance (by Company Size )
- Figure 2.31: Self-Ratings: Usin g Performance Measurement to Effect
Organizational Change (by Company Size )
- Figure 2.32: Percentage of Companies Tracking Efficiency/Operations
Performance Metrics
- Figure 2.33: Percentage of Companies Tracking Resource Metrics
- Figure 2.34: Percentage of Companies Tracking Time Milestone Metrics
- Table 2.3: Phase 4 Performance Metrics - Average Performance
- Table 2.4: Phase 4 Performance Metrics - Target Performance
- Table 2.5: Additional Phase 4 Performance Measures
Budgets, Staffing and Outosourcing
- Phase 4 Study Budgets and Outsourcing
- Figure 3.1: Percentage of Total R& D Spending Allocated to Phase 4
Trials, by Company
- Figure 3.2: Percentage of Total R& D Spending Allocated to Phase 4
Trials, by Company Size
- Figure 3.3: Average Cost Per Patient of Phase 4 Clinical Trials in the
US, by Therapeutic Area
- Figure 3.4: Percentage of In-House Phase 4 Infrastructures
- Figure 3.5: Percentage of In-House Phase 4 Infrastructures, by Company
Size
- Figure 3.6: Percentage of Phase 4 Clinical Trial Budgets Outsourced , by
Therapeutic Area
- Phase 4 Trial Staffing
- Figure 3.7: Average Numbers of Patients and Investigator Sites in Phase
4 Stafing Data
- Figure 3.8: Average Patients-Per-Site and Patients-Per-CRA Ratios in
Phase 4 Staffing Data
- Table 3.1: Average Phase 4 Trial Stafing Across All Therapeutic
Areas(FTEs)
- Table 3.2: Phase 4 Trials (Trials 1-3)
- Table 3.3: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 4-6)
- Table 3.4: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 7-10)
- Table 3.5: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 11-14)
- Table 3.6: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 15-19)
- Table 3.7: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 20-23)
- Table 3.8: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 24-28)
- Table 3.9: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 29-31)
- Table 3.10: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 32-34)
- Table 3.11: Phase 4 Trials: (Trials 35-39)
- Figure 3.9: Average Patient Counts of Therapeutic Area-Specific Trials
- Table 3.12: Average Phase 4 Trial Stafing by Therapeulic Area (FTEs)
- Figure 3.10: Percentage of Staff Outsourced by Product Type
- Table 3.13: Average Phase 4 Trial Stafing by Roduct Type (FTEs)
- Figure 3.11: Average Patient Counts of Company Size-Specific Trials
- Figure 3.12: Patients Per FTE by Company Size
- Table 3.14: Average Phase 4 Trial Stafing by Company Size(FTEs)
- Table 3.15: Average Phase 4 Trial Stafing by Trial Management Approach
(FTEs)
|