首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 製藥企業 > 小規模及專業藥劑品牌化的動向:利基市場的可能性
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4495)
肥胖症治療 (48)
非專利藥 (117)
疫苗 (168)
神經疾病 (175)
骨頭疾病治療 (41)
動物用醫藥 (18)
處方藥 (89)
規章 (107)
感染疾病 (318)
精神病 (80)
製藥企業 (506)
糖尿病 (157)
癌症 (838)
藥物開發 (1275)
DDS (173)
OTC 非處方藥 (147)
市場調查報告書

小規模及專業藥劑品牌化的動向:利基市場的可能性

Small And Specialty Drug Branding: Tapping Niche Market Potential

出版商 Cutting Edge Information
出版日期 2006年05月 商品編碼 39908
內容資訊 英文 190 Pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年12月09日停止出版。

簡介

美國醫藥品市場一直以來都是全球獲利性最高的市場。透過與利基品牌的資源分配,企業能將品牌的短期及長期獲利擴展至最大。

提供製藥產業創新且實用的調查與顧問服務的調查公司 Cutting Edge Information (總公司:美國北卡羅來那州),調查與分析小規模及專業藥劑品牌化的動向,並有系統地出版綜合報告書 "Small And Specialty Drug Branding: Tapping Niche Market Potential"

此報告書使用許多的圖表,除了說明17個品牌的行銷預算與臨床前開發中的人員配置計畫,也探討市場參與後12∼18個月後的動向等。 此報告書的概略架構如下所示。

摘要

  • 企業檔案與治療領域
  • 方法論與定義
  • 利基品牌市場:結論與建言

全球資源分配

  • 品牌1
  • 品牌2
  • 品牌3
  • 品牌4
  • 品牌5
    • 品牌投資
    • 全球預算分配
    • 人員配置
    • 市場參與動向

歐洲的行銷

  • 品牌6
  • 品牌7
  • 品牌8
  • 品牌9
  • 品牌10
    • 投資
    • 預算分配
    • 人員配置
    • 市場參與動向

美國的商品化

  • 品牌11
  • 品牌12
  • 品牌13
  • 品牌14
  • 品牌15
  • 品牌16
  • 品牌17
    • 投資
    • 預算分配
    • 人員配置
    • 市場參與動向
    • 販賣投資與美國平均

圖表

目錄

Abstract

Commercializing new drugs continues to challenge companies across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. Cutting Edge Information published this study to assist individuals and product teams who seek guidance in the allocation of pre- and post-launch marketing resources for small and specialty brands.

The information contained in this report is based on primary research gathered from brand managers and directors, marketing executives and marketing support function team members working with brands marketed in the United States, Europe and worldwide.

The following recommendations and conclusions were among Cutting Edge Information' s top study findings:

Support niche brand launches with stronger promotional infrastructures.

Niche brand development is a catch-22; companies hesitate to invest heavily in a drug targeted for less than $500 million in peak annual sales and niche brands cannot exceed $500 million because they are not properly supported. The highest global spending for any niche brand profiled in this study is...

Invest more funds in thought leader development than advertising for European launches.

With such limited budgets, brand teams need to be particularly meticulous in allocating resources to the various marketing functions. One core marketing strategy that brand teams approach differently...

Leverage smaller products for profits and strategic objectives, focusing on brand activities and advertising to grow revenue.

Blockbuster products reach multibillion dollar revenues thanks to their experienced marketing organizations. However, even experienced marketing organizations rely on niche drug launches to fill portfolio gaps and expand into new therapeutic areas. Companies with the promotional wherewithal to maximize niche sales...

Assign marketing resources in a timely fashion to have greatest impact.

Marketing a niche drug entails great attention to the timing of marketing activities. By the same token, allocating marketing dollars to support these marketing functions during key stage gates in a product' s development is paramount to a drug' s success...

Assign global staffing levels according to marketing investment levels and drugs' unique demands.

It is generally true that FTEs increase alongside financial investments. Closer examination of the products, however, shows that dollars spent is not always a predictor of staffing levels...

Charts and Graphics

RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND STRATEGIC PROFILES

  • Figure E.1: Study Context: Therapeutic Areas
  • Figure E.2: Niche Brand Commercialization Spending Breakdown
  • Figure E.3: Percent of Marketing Budget by Phase

GLOBAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  • Figure 1.1: Niche Brand Global Expenditures and Sales
  • Table 1.1: Global Launch Context
  • Figure 1.2: Global Spending
  • Figure 1.3: Global Staffing
  • Figure 1.4: Global Activities Spending
  • Figure 1.5: Global Activities Staffing
  • Figure 1.6: Global Market Research Spending
  • Figure 1.7: Global Market Research Staffing
  • Figure 1.8: Global Thought Leader Development Spending
  • Figure 1.9: Global Thought Leader Development Staffing
  • Figure 1.10: Global Advertising Spending
  • Figure 1.11: Global Advertising Staffing

Brand 1

  • Table 1.2: Brand 1 Spending
  • Figure 1.12: Brand 1: Budget Allocation
  • Table 1.3: Brand 1 Staffing
  • Figure 1.13: Brand 1: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 1.14: Brand 1: Launch Context

Brand 2

  • Table 1.4 Brand 2 Spending Table
  • Figure 1.15: Brand 2: Budget Allocation
  • Table 1.5: Brand 2 Staffing Table
  • Figure 1.16: Brand 2: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 1.17: Brand 2: Launch Context

Brand 3

  • Table 1.6: Brand 3 Spending
  • Figure 1.18: Brand 3: Budget Allocation
  • Table 1.7: Brand 3 Staffing
  • Figure 1.19: Brand 3: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 1.20: Brand 3: Launch Context

Brand 4

  • Table 1.8: Brand 4 Spending
  • Figure 1.21: Brand 4: Budget Allocation
  • Table 1.9: Brand 4 Staffing
  • Figure 1.22: Brand 4: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 1.23: Brand 4: Launch Context

Brand 5

  • Table 1.10: Brand 5 Staffing
  • Figure 1.24: Brand 5: Budget Allocation
  • Table 1.11: Brand 5 Spending
  • Figure 1.25: Brand 5: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 1.26: Brand 5: Launch Context

EUROPEAN MARKETING

  • Figure 2.1: European Marketing Mix
  • Table 2.1: European Launch Context
  • Figure 2.2: European Total Spending
  • Figure 2.3: European Total Staffing
  • Figure 2.4: European Brand Activities Spending
  • Figure 2.5: European Brand Activities Staffing
  • Figure 2.6: European Market Research Spending
  • Figure 2.7: European Market Research Staffing
  • Figure 2.8: European Thought Leader Development Spending
  • Figure 2.9: European Thought Leader Development Staffing
  • Figure 2.10: European Advertising Spending
  • Figure 2.11: European Advertising Staffing
  • Figure 2.12: Average European Marketing Spending as % of European Peak Annual Sales (by Resource Category)
  • Figure 2.13: Average Peak European Marketing Staffing (by Resource Category)
  • Figure 2.14: European Marketing Spending (as % of European Peak Annual Sales)
  • Figure 2.15: Niche Brands' Peak Total Marketing Staffing
  • Figure 2.16: Brand Activities Spending (as % of European Peak Annual Sales)
  • Figure 2.17: Peak European Brand Activities Staffing
  • Figure 2.18: European Market Research Spending (as % of European Peak Annual Sales)
  • Figure 2.19: Peak European Market Research Staffing
  • Figure 2.20: European Thought Leader Development Spending (as % of European Peak Annual Sales)
  • Figure 2.21: Peak European Thought Leader Development Staffing
  • Figure 2.22: European Advertising Spending (as % of European Peak Annual Sales)
  • Figure 2.23: Peak European Advertising Staffing

Brand 6

  • Table 2.2: Brand 6 Spending
  • Figure 2.24: Brand 6: Budget Allocation
  • Table 2.3: Brand 6 Staffing
  • Figure 2.25: Brand 6: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.26: Brand 6: Launch Context

Brand 7

  • Table 2.4: Brand 7 Spending
  • Figure 2.27: Brand 7: Budget Allocation
  • Table 2.5: Brand 7 Staffing
  • Figure 2.28: Brand 7: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.29: Brand 7: Launch Context

Brand 8

  • Table 2.6: Brand 8 Spending Table
  • Figure 2.30: Brand 8: Budget Allocation
  • Table 2.7: Brand 8 Staffing Table
  • Figure 2.31: Brand 8: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.32: Brand 8: Launch Context

Brand 9

  • Table 2.8: Brand 9 Spending
  • Figure 2.33: Brand 9: Budget Allocation
  • Table 2.9: Brand 9 Staffing
  • Figure 2.34: Brand 9: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.35: Brand 9: Launch Context
  • Table 2.10: Brand 10 Spending

Brand 10

  • Figure 2.36: Brand 10: Budget Allocation
  • Figure 2.37: Brand 10: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Table 2.11: Brand 10 Staffing
  • Figure 2.38: Brand 10: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.39: Brand 10: Launch Context

Brand 11

  • Table 2.12: Brand 11 Staffing
  • Figure 2.41: Brand 10: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Figure 2.40: Brand 11: Budget Allocation
  • Table 2.13: Brand 11 Spending
  • Figure 2.42: Brand 11: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 2.43: Brand 11: Launch Context

US COMMERCIALIZATION

  • Figure 3.1: US Marketing Mix
  • Table 3.1: US Launch Context
  • Figure 3.2: US Total Spending
  • Figure 3.3: US Total Staffing
  • Figure 3.4: US Brand Activities Spending
  • Figure 3.5: US Brand Activities Staffing
  • Figure 3.6: US Market Research Spending
  • Figure 3.7: US Market Research Staffing Figure
  • Figure 3.8: US Thought Leader Development Spending
  • Figure 3.9: US Thought Leader Development Staffing
  • Figure 3.10: US Advertising Spending
  • Figure 3.11: US Advertising Staffing

Brand 12

  • Table 3.2: Brand 12 Spending
  • Figure 3.12: Brand 12: Budget Allocation
  • Table 3.3: Brand 12 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.13: Brand 12: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.14: Brand 12: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.15: Brand 12 Sales Investment vs. US Average

Brand 13

  • Table 3.4: Brand 13 Spending
  • Figure 3.16: Brand 13: Budget Allocation
  • Figure 3.17: Brand 13: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Table 3.5: Brand 13 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.18: Brand 13: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.19: Brand 13: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.20: Brand 13 Sales Investment vs. US Average

Brand 14

  • Table 3.6: Brand 14 Spending
  • Figure 3.22: Brand 14: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Figure 3.21: Brand 14: Budget Allocation
  • Table 3.7: Brand 14 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.23: Brand 14: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.24: Brand 14: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.25: Brand 14 Sales Investment vs. US Average

Brand 15

  • Table 3.8: Brand 15 Spending
  • Figure 3.27: Brand 15: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Figure 3.26: Brand 15: Budget Allocation
  • Table 3.9: Brand 15 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.28: Brand 15: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.29: Brand 15: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.30: Brand 15 Sales Investment vs. US Average

Brand 16

  • Table 3.10: Brand 16 Spending
  • Figure 3.32: Brand 16: Budget Allocation (Early-Stage)
  • Figure 3.31: Brand 16: Budget Allocation
  • Table 3.11: Brand 16 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.33: Brand 16: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.34: Brand 16: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.35: Brand 16 Sales Investment vs. Niche Average

Brand 17

  • Table 3.12: Brand 17 Spending
  • Figure 3.36: Brand 17: Budget Allocation
  • Table 3.13: Brand 17 Staffing Table
  • Figure 3.37: Brand 17: Staffing Allocation
  • Figure 3.38: Brand 17: Launch Context
  • Figure 3.39: Brand 17 Sales Investment vs. Niche Average
Back to Top