|
市場調查報告書
Microdosing在轉化醫療上的優缺點
Microdosing in Translational Medicine: Pros and Cons
|
Microdosing在轉化醫療上的優缺點 是由出版商Insight Pharma Reports在2006年05月所出版的。
這份英文市場調查報告書包含125 pages 價格從美金2750起跳。
CREAM (Consortium for Resourcing and Evaluating AMS Microdosing) 的實驗與其他研究已經證實human microdosing (HMD)為進入第I期前的可靠篩除方式。
在調查基因領域上,素有高度評價的 Insight Pharma Reports(總公司:美國麻州),詳盡地調查與分析Microdosing在轉化醫療上的優缺點,並出版綜合報告書 "Microdosing in Translational Medicine: Pros and Cons" 。
此報告書在下面的內容裡,除了說明CREAM實驗與其他HMD研究在PK實驗線形性上的結果、以HMD為對象的EMEA與FDA的準則比較評價、in-silico等預測技術與HMD的相輔效果,也探討現今的檢測技術與新興技術的評價及PET的使用。另外也分析最初導入HMD的部門、口服/靜脈內/其他提供法的HMD應用、HMD的費用/風險管理/規範/倫理面等。
第1章 說明:初期人體資料的追求
- 使用迅速且安全方法的新藥開發必要性
- 基本的兩刀論法:根據動物結論的人體推論
- 改良有益的軟體,但是現在所需的則為判定人體效果的解決方略。
- Microdosing的概念
第2章 Microdosing與臨床藥理學
- 初期藥理學情報的優點
- Microdosing與臨床上有效供給量間的預測關係
- 評價實驗中藥劑效果的現有化合物的Microdosing
- 生物學分析的支援:限制與展望
- Microdosing的使用:安全藥理學的種類分析法
第3章 策略工具之一的Microdosing研究
- 當作醫藥品開發選擇評價工具的Microdosing
- in silico的最適化技術與"-omics"的有益融合
- 不依慣例的集團研究選擇
第4章 規範課題及Microdosing的機會
- 針對EMEA的Microdosing的政策方針書
- FDA的探索性IND準則
- 針對放射性醫藥品研究的其他規範準則
- 成本、時間、物流的優點
- 倫理面:志願者的負擔與動物使用的減少
第5章 利用Microdosing的實驗性經驗及階段性計畫
- 透過In Vitro/動物實驗的概念證明
- 產業與公家/民間的合作活動
- 為Microdosing研究贊助商的製藥企業
第6章 專家的座談會
第7章 結論:Cambridge Healthtech Associates的醫藥品開發藍圖
- 依據醫藥品製程階段所決定的當今展望
- 非科學性/非經濟性要素的克服
- 活躍的新興工具
附錄
Abstract
Microdosing in Translational Medicine: Pros and Cons evaluates this innovative
approach to investigating candidate molecules.
The CREAM trial and other studies have largely validated the concept of human
microdosing (HMD) as a reliable screen for basing go/no go decisions to Phase
I. CHA predicts human microdosing (HMD) will first be used by smaller drug
developers with limited resources, finding broader acceptance by the industry
as a routine "litmus test" by 2012. Orest Hurko, AVP of Translational Research
at Wyeth, expects 75% of biopharma companies to implement it over the next 5
years.
Microdosing in Translational Medicine: Pros and Cons provides a balanced
evaluation of the pros and cons of HMD, including:
- What the CREAM trial and other HMD studies say about the linearity of PK
results.
- Comparative assessment of EMEA and FDA guidelines governing HMD - which
offers the more hospitable pathway?
- Use of HMD in synergy with in silico and other predictive technologies.
- Assessment of current detection technologies and emerging improvements.
- Use of PET in HMD to study ligand displacement.
- Which sector will adopt HMD first --- big pharma or biotechs?
- Applications of HMD using oral, IV, and other routes of administration.
- Examination of cost-benefit, risk management, regulatory and ethical
aspects of HMD.
Microdosing in Translational Medicine: Pros and Cons is based upon:
- Roundtable interviews with CEOs of the leading CROs specializing in HMD.
- A survey of the views, actions and planned activities of R&D managers at
pharma and biotech companies with responsibility for selecting candidates for
Phase I.
- Forecast of the market for HMD services and timelines to adoption by
pharma and biotech companies.
About the Author
Hermann A.M. Mucke, Ph.D. spent 17 years in academia and industry before he
founded H.M. Pharma Consultancy (www.hmpharmacon.com) in 2000 to become an
independent pharmaceutical consultant, analyst and science author. His last
industry position was Vice President R&D in a European pharmceutical company
which he helped to take public on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in 1999. Since
then, Dr. Mucke, who holds a Ph.D. in biochemistry from the University of
Vienna (Austria) became a consultant and advisory board member for several
European and U.S. pharmaceutical companies, and a regular reviewer of drugs
and patents for Thomson Current Drugs and Ashley Publications. He has served
as an outside expert author for CHA since 2004. Dr. Mucke is based in Vienna
and can be reached at h.mucke@hmpharmacon.com , or by fax at +43 1 494 9989.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction: The Quest for Early Human Data
- 1.1 A Quicker and Safer Way to Develop New Drugs is Needed
- 1.2 The Basic Dilemma: Extrapolating from Animals to Humans
- 1.3 Better Software Will Help, But Solutions for Judging Effects on Humans
are Needed Now
- 1.4 The Concept of Microdosing
Chapter 2. Microdosing and Clinical Pharmacology
- 2.1 The Benefit of Early Human Pharmacodynamic Information
- 2.2 Expected Relations between Microdoses and Clinically Effective Doses
- 2.3 Microdosing Known Compounds to Assess Investigational Drug Effects
- 2.4 Bioanalytical Support: Constraints and Perspectives
- Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
- Tandem Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- 2.5 Using Microdosing-Type Analytical Methods in Safety Pharmacology
Chapter 3. Microdosing Studies as a Strategic Tool
- 3.1 Microdosing as a Tool to Weigh Drug Development Options
- 3.2 A Fruitful Marriage with in silico Optimization Techniques and "-omics"
- 3.3 Option for Studies in Unconventional Populations
Chapter 4. Microdosing as a Regulatory Challenge and Opportunity
- 4.1 The EMEA Position Paper on Microdosing
- 4.2 The FDA Exploratory IND Guideline
- 4.3 Other Regulatory Guidelines for Studies Using Radioactive Drugs
- 4.4 Benefits in Costs, Time, and Logistics
- 4.5 The Ethical Aspect: Reducing the Burden on Volunteers and the Use of
Animals
Chapter 5. Practical Experience and Planning-Stage Projects with Microdosing
- 5.1 Proof of Concept through In Vitro and Animal Studies
- 5.2 Collaborative Industry and Public/Private Efforts
- The Consortium for Resourcing and Evaluating AMS Microdosing
- Azidothymidin Study by Radiant Research and Vitalea Sciences
- The EU Microdose AMS Partnership Programme (EUMAPP)
- 5.3 Pharmaceutical Companies as Sponsors of Microdosing Studies
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Servier
- Speedel Pharmaceuticals
- Tripep
- Neurocrine Biosciences
- Industry Opinions on the Acceptance of Microdosing
Chapter 6. Expert Roundtable Commentaries
- Dr. Ali Arjomand, President and COO, Accium Biosciences
- Dr. Stephen Dueker, President, Vitalea Science
- Dr. Jon Ruckle, Medical Director, Early Phase Research, Radiant Research
- Dr. Lloyd Stevens, Business Support Manager, Pharmaceutical Profiles
- Prof. Dr. Colin Garner, CEO, Xceleron
- Question 1: Do you see possibilities for modifying current microdosing
protocals to make them more predictive?
- Question 2: Do you see additional potential in evaluating other parameters
relevant to drug development, such as drug interactions?
- Question 3: How do you estimate the potential of isotopes other than 14C?
- Question 4: How do you see the relationship between AMS and LC/MS/MS
developing?
- Question 5: What role do you see for imaging technologies, expecially PET,
in microdosing studies?
- Question 6: Could human microdosing be accepted to such an extent that it
becomes a routine screening tool for drug leads in a streamlined clinical
development process?
- Question 7: Could you comment on the potential feedback loops between
human microdosing studies, the various "-omics," and in silico methods?
- Question 8: Do you see opportunities for microdosing in formal preclinical
study programs?
- Question 9: With EMEA and FDA guidelines in place, how do you think the
scenery will develop geographically during the next few years?
- Question 10: What are your optimistic and pessimistic estimates for the
dollar volume of the microdosing market by 2010 and 2015?
- Question 11: What share of this market do you estimate your company will
capture by 2010 and 2015?
Chapter 7. Conclusion: Cambridge Healthtech Associates' Scenario for Microdosing in Drug Development
- 7.1 Today's Outlook Depends on Where You Are in the Drug Development
Process
- 7.2 Along the Way: Getting Over Nonscientific and Noneconomic Factors
- 7.3 An Exciting New Tool
Appendix A.
- Companies Offering Microdosing Services
Appendix B.
- Cambridge Healthtech Associates - Microdosing Survey - April 2006-04-24
References
Company Index with Web Addresses
|