首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 製藥 > 規章 > 臨床開發的新型態:2015年的臨床實驗
產業/市場分類
製藥 (4495)
肥胖症治療 (48)
非專利藥 (117)
疫苗 (168)
神經疾病 (175)
骨頭疾病治療 (41)
動物用醫藥 (18)
處方藥 (89)
規章 (107)
感染疾病 (318)
精神病 (80)
製藥企業 (506)
糖尿病 (157)
癌症 (838)
藥物開發 (1275)
DDS (173)
OTC 非處方藥 (147)
市場調查報告書

臨床開發的新型態:2015年的臨床實驗

A New Paradigm for Clinical Development: The Clinical Trial in 2015

出版商 Insight Pharma Reports
出版日期 2005年12月 商品編碼 34854
內容資訊 英文 95 pages
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2011年07月19日停止出版。

簡介

現今製藥產業所面臨的生產性危機持續地擴大。儘管全球市場在2003-2004年間創下販賣新藥數25年來的新低點,然而在2004年向FDA申請實驗許可的新藥候補藥卻創下1998年以來的新高點

在調查基因領域上,素有高度評價的 Insight Pharma Reports(總公司:美國麻州),詳盡地調查與分析製藥產業臨床開發的新型態,並且統整2015年臨床實驗的預測結果,出版綜合報告書 "A New Paradigm for Clinical Development: The Clinical Trial in 2015"

此報告書使用95頁的篇幅,不僅分析與預測當今臨床實驗的問題、克服問題的策略、影響未來的傾向、規範環境、2015年的藍圖等,也提供主要企業檔案。此報告書的概略架構如下所示。

第1章 今日的臨床實驗

  • 目標/研究開發費用/候補藥的增加、新製品的減少
  • 第I-IV期的臨床實驗過程
  • 策略問題的分析

第2章 邁向臨床開發合理化的當今策略

  • 臨床實行/中止決定的費用效果解決方略
  • 企劃最適化
  • 更迅速地募集合適的實驗對象
  • 獲得充分情報的臨床設計與生物標誌
  • 電子資料的收集:邁向電子臨床實驗之路
  • 臨床資料庫的檢索

第3章 對未來臨床實驗的影響力

  • 交錯的大規模傾向
  • 處於臨床變遷期的不是技術發展而是型態的改變
  • 為了釐清藥劑疾病與病患反應的系統生物學
  • 當今的生物標誌
  • 普及運算:新情報技術能否促進臨床實驗的發展

第4章 處於變遷時代的規範機構

  • FDA的主導權
  • 完全的QT實驗:臨床研究改革的國際協調案例
  • placebo的衰退
  • 重視取代大規模介入實驗的市場販賣後調查

第5章 2015年的臨床實驗藍圖

第6章 企業檔案

  • ClinPhone Group
  • Compugen
  • Entelos, Inc.
  • etrials Worldwide, Inc.
  • Gene Network Sciences
  • IBM Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • LifeTree Technology LLC
  • Pharsight Corporation
  • Quintiles Transnational Corporation
  • Xceleron Ltd.

目錄

Abstract

A New Paradigm for Clinical Development:

The Clinical Trial in 2015

A New Paradigm for Clinical Development: The Clinical Trial in 2015 outlines an innovative and imaginative strategy for reinventing clinical development, and demonstrates why a complete overhaul of the clinical trials process is feasible from a conceptual, technical and logistical point of view.

The current clinical evaluation process is fraught with inefficiencies, resulting in numerous compound failures and exploding development costs. Until recently, the industry has reacted to the clinical evaluation problem essentially by "streamlining" the existing processes and by introducing information technology in a cautious and evolutionary fashion. While the FDA's Critical Path Initiative of 2004 showed that the agency is willing to take the lead in working with representatives from industry and academia towards a remedy, this report suggests that a more radical solution is needed.

A New Paradigm for Clinical Development: The Clinical Trial in 2015 proposes a bidirectional approach to accelerate the clinical process and make it more effective. These two avenues, which can be summarized as revamping trial design and as truly pervasive modelling and monitoring driven by information technology, are fundamentally different from each other but need to be implemented in a closely linked fashion. Though radical in effect, none of these changes would involve concepts or technologies that are unknown today.

According to the strategy laid out in the report, the following changes are required:

  • Phase I will assume a new role as a brief confirmatory testing stage for the model for drug-human interactions that the sponsor has proposed.
  • Phases II and III will merge into a single advanced-stage human testing phase involving fewer patients than today, relying on relatively small patient populations that are highly homogenous with respect to key criteria of pharmacological response.
  • Systematic post-marketing studies and a significantly improved and extended post-marketing surveillance system that goes far beyond adverse event reporting will be integrated into a post-marketing monitoring phase that documents real-life use of the newly licensed drug.

These new processes will be made possible through holistic mathematical models such as the virtual patient, extensive biomarker monitoring, and pervasive computing. With a full implementation of all envisaged changes by the year 2015, the stage would be set for a new world of drug development:

  • The pre-approval clinical trial phase might be shortened to about three years and 40-50 percent of all candidate compounds that enter this stage could complete it, with the majority of the failures occurring in the early human validation phase.
  • The crucial function of the advanced-stage human testing phase will be to determine whether efficacy is sufficiently superior over the established standard of therapy to warrant the cost of launch and the mandated post-marketing monitoring.
  • Developers recoup development costs earlier and enjoy a longer life cycle under patent protection, but also benefit from more and closer attention to real-life use of the newly licensed drug.

About the Author

Hermann A.M. Mucke, Ph.D. spent 17 years in academia and industry before he founded H.M. Pharma Consultancy (www.hmpharmacon.com) in 2000 to become an independent pharmaceutical consultant, analyst and science author. His last industry position was Vice President R&D in a European pharmceutical company which he helped to take public on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in 1999. Since then, Dr. Mucke, who holds a Ph.D. in biochemistry from the University of Vienna (Austria) became a consultant and advisory board member for several European and U.S. pharmaceutical companies, and a regular reviewer of drugs and patents for Thomson Current Drugs and Ashley Publications. He has served as an outside expert author for CHA since 2004. Dr. Mucke is based in Vienna and can be reached at h.mucke@hmpharmacon.com , or by fax at +43 1 494 9989.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Clinical Trials Today

1.1. More Targets, More Research and Development Spending, More Candidate Drugs?and Fewer New Products

1.2. The Clinical Trial Process: From Phase I to Phase IV

1.3. A Strategic Problem Analysis

  • Why Do Phase III Trials Fail So Frequently?
  • High-Profile Market Recalls: The Worst-Case Scenario Enacted
  • Approved but Not Effective in All Eligible Patients

Chapter 2. Current Strategies for Clinical Streamlining

2.1. Cost-Effective Solutions for Clinical Go/No-Go Decisions

  • Better Disease Models that Are Predictive of Human Exposure
  • Human Microdosing: "Phase Zero"

2.2. Optimized Project Planning

2.3. Recruiting the "Right" Patients More Quickly?and Keeping Them

  • Maximizing Outpatient Compliance
  • "Offshoring" Clinical Trials

2.4. "Information-Rich" Trial Design and Biomarkers

  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Biomarkers for Clinical Monitoring

2.5. Electronic Data Capture: Heading for the "E-Trial"

  • Digitizing the Case Report Form
  • Interactive Voice Response Systems and Web-Supported Trials
  • The E-Trial: A "Revolutionary Evolution"

2.6. Mining Clinical Databases

Chapter 3. Forces Shaping Future Clinical Trials

3.1. The Confounding Mega-Trends

3.2. Paradigm Changes Rather than Technological Leaps at the Clinical Inflection Point

3.3. Systems Biology as a Key to Understanding Disease and Patients' Reactions to Drugs

  • The Virtual Patient: A "Crash Dummy" for the Pharmaceutical Industry

3.4. Beyond Today's Biomarkers

  • Molecular Fingerprinting and Metabolomics
  • Functional Endpoints Defined by Molecular Imaging
  • Theranostics: The Co-Evolvement of Drugs and Diagnostics

3.5. Pervasive Computing: Can a New Type of Information Technology Bring Trials to New Shores?

  • Clinical Data Management Systems (CDMS)
  • The Omnipresent Radiofrequency Tags
  • Grid Computing, Virtual Trial Organizations, and Data Interchange

Chapter 4. Regulatory Agencies in an Era of Change

4.1. The FDA Takes the Initiative

  • The FDA's "Exploratory Investigational New Drug Application" Guideline
  • The FDA's Critical Path Document
  • The Biomarker Bootstrap Situation
  • The FDA and the Emerging E-Trial Modalities

4.2. The Thorough QT Trial: An Example for International Coordination of Clinical Study Reform

4.3. The Dwindling Role of the Placebo

4.4. Focused Postmarketing Surveillance Instead of Megatrials

Chapter 5. A Scenario for Clinical Trials in the Year 2015

Chapter 6. Corporate Profiles

  • Clinphone Group
  • Compugen
  • Entelos, Inc.
  • eTrials Worldwide, Inc.
  • Gene Network Sciences
  • IBM Healthcare and Life Sciences
  • Lifetree Technology LLC

References

Index

Back to Top