Cover Image
市場調查報告書

中國的除草劑市場上的競爭狀態

Competitive Herbicides in China

出版商 CCM 商品編碼 310308
出版日期 內容資訊 英文 75 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2個工作天內
價格
Back to Top
中國的除草劑市場上的競爭狀態 Competitive Herbicides in China
出版日期: 2014年07月01日 內容資訊: 英文 75 Pages
簡介

由於對除草劑具抗性的基因改造(GM)作物登場,全球除草劑市場大幅變化。活性度極高的除草劑(醯胺系/磺醯尿素系/咪唑酮系除草劑)登場,還有嘉磷塞(Glyphosate)的銷售額大幅度增加,另一方面與其競爭的產品也出現。中國從以前便銷售6種除草劑(嘉磷塞(Glyphosate)、巴拉刈(Paraquat)、莫多草(Metolachlor)、2,4-D、草脫淨(Atrazine)),不過由於功能和供需結構相似,有很強的競爭關係。

本報告提供中國國內的各種農藥的競爭狀態相關分析、市場競爭的整體結構、個別產品功能方面、市場方面的競爭情形的資訊,為您概述為以下內容。

第1章 概要

第2章 產品結構

第3章 除草劑市場競爭要素

第4章 中國國內有競爭關係的除草劑

  • 選擇性/非選擇性除草劑
  • 磺醯尿素系/醯胺系/Triazine系/苯氧乙酸系/咪唑酮系除草劑
  • 嘉磷塞(Glyphosate)、巴拉刈(Paraquat)
  • 嘉磷塞(Glyphosate)、固殺草(Glufosinate-ammonium)、Dicamba、2,4-D
    • 嘉磷塞(Glyphosate):保持全球除草劑市場上的獨佔地位
    • Dicamba:預測在短期項目數擴大
    • 固殺草(Glufosinate-ammonium):追逐嘉磷塞(Glyphosate)的中生代產品
    • 2,4-D(2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸):迎接第二次熱潮的可能性
  • 乙草胺(Acetochlor)、莫多草(Metolachlor)
  • 2,4-D、草脫淨(Atrazine)
  • 精惡唑禾草靈(Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl), 快伏草(Quizalofop-P-ethyl)
  • 煙嘧磺隆(Nicosulfuron)、甲基磺草酮(Mesotrione)、苯唑草酮(Topramezone)
  • 百速隆(Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl)、免速隆(Bensulfuron-methyl)

第5章 結論

圖表一覽

目錄

GM (Genetically modified) crops with herbicide tolerance have greatly driven the development of some herbicides in the past years. As some herbicide categories of ultra-high activity such as amide herbicides, sulfonylurea herbicides and imidazolone herbicides came out, the development of chemical weeding brought revolutionary change.

GM crops also impact the global herbicide market. Before herbicide-tolerant GM crops were developed, glyphosate only ranked the fifth in the global herbicide market, but now it is the biggest pesticide product which is well known in pesticide industry for many years. As more and more crops are resistant to glyphosate, competitive products of glyphosate such as glufosinate ammonium and dicamba come out.

In China, the six conventional herbicide products are glyphosate, paraquat, acetochlor, metolachlor, 2,4-D and atrazine. They have built some competitive relationship between the herbicide products of similar features, or similar supply and demand. Other competitive herbicide products also show their competitiveness mainly of similar features and their application fields.

In this report, the competitive herbicides had been analyzed exhaustively in the following aspects:

  • Overview
  • Product structure
  • Factors for herbicide competition
  • Competitive herbicides in China
  • Conclusion

Executive summary:

In the rapid development of China's herbicide market in the past few years, competitions are common among herbicide products, which have similar features, application scope, or show similar supplies and demands. Factors influencing the competitiveness of these herbicide products are mainly spectrum, toxicity, and price and consumption habit among farmers.

Glyphosate and paraquat, two main nonselective herbicides both in China and the world, remain the most popular herbicides and widely used in non-tillage fields. With the popularization of non-tillage technology in China, the consumption volumes of glyphosate and paraquat increase significantly.

In terms of selective herbicides, acetochlor remains the largest herbicide consumed in China, mainly for the pre-emergence control of weeds in the fields of soybean, cotton and peanut.

Moreover, atrazine remains the most popular pre-emergence herbicide used in corn fields thanks to its low price and mature promotion.

Among these conventional products, some have shown significant weakness on toxicity due to domestic enhancing standard of environmental policies, such as acetochlor and paraquat. Acetochlor's substitute has emerged at present, namely metolachlor, which has more excellent weeding performance.

Some small herbicide products also have showed good market potential in China, such as topramezone. But their high prices due to the patent protection will keep hindering the development of these products for years in the future.

It's worth noting that although glyphosate showed more strengths than paraquat over the past years in China, it's facing some threats. The large-area promotion of GM crops all over the world has brought more and more weeds resisting glyphosate, which means that glyphosate will gradually become less effective in weed control. Global leading enterprises have started some R&D pipelines of substitutes for glyphosate. So far, the potential substitutes for glyphosate are dicamba, glufosinate ammonium and 2,4-D according to the R&D pipelines in the globe. Therefore, enterprises could better improve their production technology on these products, so that they can keep a leading role in the domestic herbicide market when the market size of overseas herbicides gradually shrinks.

Table of Contents

1 Overview

2 Product structure

3 Factors for herbicide competition

4 Competitive herbicides in China

  • 4-1 Selective herbicides, nonselective herbicides
  • 4-2 Sulfonylurea herbicides, amide herbicides, triazine herbicides, phenoxyacetic acid herbicides, imidazolinone herbicides
  • 4-3 Glyphosate, paraquat
  • 4-4 Glyphosate, glufosinate ammonium, dicamba, 2,4-D
    • 4-4-1 Glyphosate: the lonely player on the global pesticide stage
    • 4-4-2 Dicamba: the foreseeably outburst variety in the short term
    • 4-4-3 Glufosinate ammonium: the mesozoic product chasing glyphosate
    • 4-4-4 2,4-D: hopeful to welcome its second spring
  • 4-5 Acetochlor, metolachlor
  • 4-6 2,4-D, atrazine
  • 4-7 Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, quizalofop-P-ethyl
  • 4-8 Nicosulfuron, mesotrione, topramezone
  • 4-9 Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl, bensulfuron-methyl

5 Conclusion

List of tables:

  • Table 2-1 Classification of herbicides by chemical structure
  • Table 2-2 Classification of herbicides by selectivity
  • Table 2-3 Market value of major herbicide products in China, 2008-2013, million USD
  • Table 2-4 Market value of major herbicide products in the globe, 2003-2011, million USD
  • Table 4.1-1 Comparison on features between selective herbicides and nonselective herbicides
  • Table 4.1-2 Competitiveness between nonselective herbicides and selective herbicides
  • Table 4.2-1 Comparison on features between major herbicide categories
  • Table 4.2-2 Competitiveness between major herbicide categories
  • Table 4.2-3 Change of global market value of major herbicide catogories, 2006&2011, 2010&2011, million USD
  • Table 4.2-4 Market share of major herbicide categories in global market, 2006, 2010, 2011
  • Table 4.3-1 Overview on glyphosate and paraquat
  • Table 4.3-2 Comparison on major features between glyphosate and paraquat
  • Table 4.3-3 Competitiveness between glyphosate and paraquat in China
  • Table 4.3-4 Registration number of glyphosate and paraquat in China, as of 16 June, 2014
  • Table 4.4-1 Products in the next-five-year R&D pipelines of six leading seed companies in the world, 2013
  • Table 4.4-2 Overview on glyphosate, glufosinate ammonium, dicamba and 2,4-D
  • Table 4.4.2-1 Comparison on the weeding performance between dicamba and glyphosate
  • Table 4.4.3-1 Comparison on main features of glyphosate and glufosinate ammonium
  • Table 4.4.4-1 Major mixed formulations type of 2,4-D
  • Table 4.5-1 Overview on metolachlor and acetochlor
  • Table 4.5-2 Comparison on the features between acetochlor and metolachlor
  • Table 4.5-3 Competitiveness between acetochlor and metolachlor in China
  • Table 4.5-4 Registration number of acetochlor and metolachlor in China, as of 16 June, 2014
  • Table 4.6-1 Overview on 2,4-D and atrazine
  • Table 4.6-2 Registration number of 2,4-D and atrazine in China, as of 16 June, 2014
  • Table 4.7-1 Overview on fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and quizalofop-P-ethyl
  • Table 4.7-2 Registration number of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and quizalofop-P-ethyl in China, as of 16 June, 2014
  • Table 4.8-1 Overview on nicosulfuron, mesotrione and topramezone
  • Table 4.8-2 Comparison on the features among nicosulfuron, mesotrione and topramezone
  • Table 4.8-3 Competitiveness among nicosulfuron, mesotrione and topramezone in China
  • Table 4.8-4 Registration number of nicosulfuron, mesotrione and topramezone in China, as of 16 June, 2014
  • Table 4.9-1 Comparison on the features between pyrazosulfuron-ethyl and bensulfuron-methyl
  • Table 4.9-2 Competitiveness of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl and bensulfuron-methyl in China
  • Table 4.9-3 Registration number of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl and bensulfuron-methyl in China, as of 16 June, 2014

List of figures:

  • Figure 2-1 Market value share of herbicides by category in China, 2013
  • Figure 2-2 Structure of nonselective herbicides and selective herbicides by registration number in China, as of 16 June 2014
  • Figure 2-3 Output structure of main herbicide products in China, 2013
  • Figure 2-4 Output structure of main herbicide products in China, 2008
  • Figure 2-5 Consumption structure of major herbicides in China by volume, 2013
  • Figure 2-6 Market value share of herbicides by category in the globe, 2013
  • Figure 2-7 Structure of nonseletive herbicides and selective herbicides by global market value, 2011
  • Figure 3-1 Global planting structure of crops by area, 2013
  • Figure 3-2 China's planting areas of major crops, 2013
  • Figure 3-3 Planting area share of GM cotton in the US, 2000-2012
  • Figure 3-4 Planting area share of GM corn in the US, 2000-2012
  • Figure 3-5 Planting area of main GM crops in the world, 1996-2012
  • Figure 3-6 Planting structure of major crops in the world, 2012
  • Figure 4.1-1 Global market share of selective herbicides and nonselective herbicides, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.1-2 Global market share of glyphosate in the nonselective herbicides, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.2-1 Market value of major herbicide catogories in global market, 2006-2011
  • Figure 4.3-1 Market value of glyphosate and paraquat in global market, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.3-2 Consumption and market value of glyphosate and paraquat in China,2009-2013
  • Figure 4.3-3 Annual ex-works prices of glyphosate 95% technical and paraquat 42% TK in China, 2004-2013
  • Figure 4.3-4 Monthly ex-works price of glyphosate 95% technical and paraquat 42% TK in China, Jan. 2008-May 2014
  • Figure 4.3-5 Annual ex-works prices of paraquat 20% AS and glyphosate 50% SP in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.3-6 Monthly ex-works prices of paraquat 20% AS and glyphosate 50% SP in China, Jan. 2008-May 2014
  • Figure 4.3-7 Consumption structure of glyphosate by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.3-8 Consumption structure of paraquat by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.3-9 Capacity of glyphosate 95% technical and paraquat 42% technical in China, 2007-2013
  • Figure 4.3-10 Output of glyphosate 95% technical and paraquat 42% technical in China, 2007-2013
  • Figure 4.3-11 Forecast on output of glyphosate 95% technical and paraquat 42% technical in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.3-12 Forecast on consumption and market value of glyphosate and paraquat in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.4-1 Market value of glyphosate in global market, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.4-2 Market value of glufosinate ammonium, dicamba and 2,4-D in global market, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.4-3 Annual ex-works prices of glyphosate 95% technical, dicamba 98% technical, glufosinate ammonium 95% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, 2007-2013
  • Figure 4.4-4 Capacity of glyphosate 95% technical and 2,4-D 95% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.4-5 Capacity of glufosinate ammonium 95% technical and dicamba 98% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.4-6 Output of glyphosate 95% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.4-7 Output of glufosinate ammonium 95% technical and dicamba 98% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.4.1-1 Global output value and its share of amino acid herbicides in the world, 1991-2011
  • Figure 4.4.1-2 Monsanto's sales value of glyphosate in amino acid herbicides in the globe, 2005, 2007, 2009
  • Figure 4.4.1-3 Major herbicides usage share in soybean in the US, 2012
  • Figure 4.4.1-4 Major herbicides usage share in corn in the US, 2012
  • Figure 4.4.1-5 Number of new glyphosate-resistant weeds in the globe, 1996-2012
  • Figure 4.4.1-6 Affected area by glyphosate-resistant weeds in the US, 2010-2012
  • Figure 4.4.2-1 Comparison on weeding performance in dicamba-tolerance soybean fields between different herbicides
  • Figure 4.4.2-2 Monsanto's schedule on product R&D pipelines of GM products, 2012
  • Figure 4.4.3-1 Global and China's market value of glufosinate ammonium, 2003-2012, million USD
  • Figure 4.4.3-2 Domestic consumption of glufosinate ammonium in China, 2007-2013
  • Figure 4.4.4-1 Forecast on planting area of 2,4-D-tolerant corn in the globe, 2013-2018
  • Figure 4.5-1 Market value of acetochlor and metolachlor in the globe, 2003-2011
  • Figure 4.5-2 Global market share of metolachlor and acetochlor among amide herbicides, 2011
  • Figure 4.5-3 Consumption and market value of acetochlor and metolachlor in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.5-4 Annual ex-works prices of acetochlor 92% technical and metolachlor 97% technical in China, 2007-2012
  • Figure 4.5-5 Monthly ex-works prices of acetochlor 92% technical and metolachlor 97% technical in China, Jan. 2008-May 2014
  • Figure 4.5-6 Annual ex-works prices of acetochlor 90% EC and metolachlor 720g/L EC in China, 2007-2013
  • Figure 4.5-7 Monthly ex-works prices of acetochlor 90% EC and metolachlor 720g/L EC in China, Jan. 2011-Nov. 2012
  • Figure 4.5-8 Consumption structure of acetochlor by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.5-9 Consumption structure of metolachlor by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.5-10 Capacity of acetochlor 92% technical and metolachlor 97% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.5-11 Output of acetochlor 92% technical and metolachlor 97% technical in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.5-12 Forecast on output of acetochlor 92% technical and metolachlor 97% technical in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.5-13 Forecast on consumption and market value of acetochlor and metolachlor in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.6-1 Consumption and market value of 2,4-D and atrazine in China, 2008-2013
  • Figure 4.6-2 Annual ex-works prices of atrazine 97% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, 2007-2012
  • Figure 4.6-3 Monthly ex-works prices of atrazine 97% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, Jan. 2011-May 2013
  • Figure 4.6-4 Annual ex-works prices of atrazine 80% WP and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid amine salt 860g/L SL in China, 2008-2012
  • Figure 4.6-5 Monthly ex-works prices of atrazine 80% WP and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid amine salt 860g/L SL, Jan. 2011-Jan. 2013
  • Figure 4.6-6 Consumption structure of 2,4-D by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.6-7 Consumption structure of atrazine by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.6-8 Capacity of atrazine 97% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.6-9 Output of atrazine 97% technical and 2,4-D 96% technical in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.6-10 Output of 2,4-D 96% technical and atrazine 97% technical in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.6-11 Forecast on consumption and market value of 2,4-D and atrazine in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.7-1 Market share of fenoxaprop and quizalofop in aryloxy-propionate herbicides in the globe, 2011
  • Figure 4.7-2 Consumption and market value of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and quizalofop-P-ethyl in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.7-3 Monthly ex-works prices of quizalofop-P-ethyl 95% technical and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl 95% technical in China, Jan. 2008-May 2014
  • Figure 4.7-4 Monthly ex-works prices of quizalofop-P-ethyl 5% EC and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl 6.9% EC in China, May 2008-Dec. 2012
  • Figure 4.7-5 Consumption structure of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.7-6 Consumption structure of quizalofop-P-ethyl by crops in China, 2013
  • Figure 4.7-7 Capacity of quizalofop-p-ethyl 95% technical and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl 95% technical in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.7-8 Output of quizalofop-p-ethyl 95% technical and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl 95% technical in China, 2009-2013
  • Figure 4.7-9 Forecast on output of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl 95% technical and quizalofop-P-ethyl 95% technical in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.7-10 Forecast on consumption and market value of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and quizalofop-P-ethyl in China, 2014-2018
  • Figure 4.8-1 Monthly ex-works prices of nicosulfuron 95% technical and mesotrione 98% technical in China, Jan. 2011-May 2014
  • Figure 4.8-2 Capacity of nicosulfuron technical and mesotrione technical in China, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4.8-3 Output of nicosulfuron technical and mesotrione technical in China, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4.9-1 Monthly ex-works prices of bensulfuron-methyl 97% technical and pyrazosulfuron-ethyl 98% technical in China, Jan. 2009-May 2014
  • Figure 4.9-2 Capacity of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl technical and bensulfuron-methyl technical in China, 2010-2013
  • Figure 4.9-3 Output of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl technical and bensulfuron-methyl technical in China, 2010-2013
Back to Top