首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 生物科技 > 品牌差異化擴大市場佔有率:生命科學市場
產業/市場分類
生物科技 (1470)
分子標靶治療學 (51)
生技設備 (321)
生物材料 (55)
生物標記 (157)
以基因為基之藥物開發 (201)
再生醫學 (120)
抗體和免疫 (187)
個人化醫學 (54)
基因治療學和RNAi (101)
市場調查報告書

品牌差異化擴大市場佔有率:生命科學市場

Maximizing Market Share Through Brand Differentiation

出版商 BioInformatics, LLC
出版日期 2006年05月 商品編碼 38329
內容資訊 英文 175 pages
價格
US $ 1600 Hard Copy
US $ 2600 PDF by E-mail (Corporate License) & Hard Copy


品牌差異化擴大市場佔有率:生命科學市場 是由出版商BioInformatics, LLC在2006年05月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書包含175 pages 價格從美金1600起跳。

簡介

在競爭非常激烈的生命科學市場中為求與其他產品的差異化,光靠產品的優點及特徵還不夠。強而有力的企業品牌為產品創造附加價值並帶來光環效果。

提供科學・醫藥相關高可信度資訊的美國市調公司 BioInformatics, LLC (總公司:維吉尼亞州),針對生命科學市場的品牌差異化與市場佔有率的擴大進行調查分析,經系統整理後出版報告書 "Maximizing Market Share Through Brand Differentiation" 。

報告書內容包括:生命科學市場主要名牌運用的簡介及品牌所需必要素等之解說、根據對 1000 名以上全球的生命科學者調查結果分析目前利用中的品牌及對各品牌支出內容簡介、各品牌的滿意度、熟悉感、有益性等之結果。內容綱要摘記如下:

第1章 調查結果分析與解釋

  • 簡介
  • 調查目的
  • 生命科學市場中品牌的利用
  • 品牌之 5 大重要要素
    • 表現
    • 定位
    • 知名度
    • 收益性
    • 優點
  • 總論

第2章 調查方法與人口統計

  • 簡介
  • 調查目的
  • 生命科學市場中品牌的利用

第3章 公布調查資料

  • 利用品牌
    • 現在利用中品牌
  • 品牌別表現
    • 品牌別支出比例
    • 利用年數
    • 有益性
    • 熟悉感
    • 満足度
  • 購買行為
    • 價格的接受度
    • 購得容易度
    • 客戶服務的水準
    • 技術支援的水準
    • 最近一次的購買
  • 品牌比較
  • 品牌的特徵
  • 對品牌的滿意度
  • 人口統計

第4章 附錄

品牌比較的目標企業

  • Affymetrix
  • New England
  • Biolabs
  • Applied Biosystems
  • Promega
  • BD Biosciences
  • Qiagen
  • Bio-Rad
  • Roche Applied Science
  • Eppendorf
  • Sigma-Aldrich
  • Fermentas
  • Stratagene
  • Fisher Scientific
  • Takara Bio
  • GE Healthcare
  • Thermo Electron
  • Invitrogen

目錄

Abstract

In a crowded life science market, lists of advantages and product features are no longer sufficient to differentiate one company' s offerings from another' s. How does a supplier capture potential customers' attention and ensure that scientists develop a positive impression of its brand? A strong corporate brand can have a halo effect on a company' s products across market segments, generating excitement and a premium on that company' s goods and services. Brands that can establish an emotional connection with customers benefit from the luxury of “earning” time with scientists to make a rational, persuasive case for buying their products. Without this close bond, however, a corporation' s product brands can get lost in the multitude of companies vying for scientists' attention.

BioInformatics' latest report, Maximizing Market Share Through Brand Differentiation, provides suppliers with a frank and unbiased assessment of how their customers perceive their corporate brands compared to competing corporate brands. These insights will help suppliers better differentiate themselves from their closest competitors because they detail what elements are most critical in building customer loyalty and what brand characteristics customers most prefer.

Based upon the opinions of over 1,000 life scientists globally, this report provides an overall brand “scorecard” based upon key performance metrics. This scorecard can be used to determine broad areas in which specific suppliers require attention (e.g, promotion strategies, product strategies, price strategies, place strategies, or service strategies) in order to improve a supplier' s brand image. The report also includes a special focus on “differentiation mapping,” which depicts brand relationships based upon similarities and differences between corporate brands. This information will provide suppliers with insight into understanding their competitive position and that of their key rivals in the market. It will enable suppliers to strengthen both their offensive strategy (i.e., From which companies can market share be taken?) and defensive strategy (i.e., From which companies should market share be protected?). Also unique to this report is measurement of each brand' s equity in relation to other brands.

From the perspective of life scientists, this report analyzes the performance and perceptions of 17 corporate brands in the life science market.

This report delivers the following:

  • Estimates market share for different market segments and geographic regions using a set of hierarchical customer-based factors
  • Assesses brand personality as a critical determinant of value creation and brand differentiation
  • Examines market factors that influence a customer' s decision to purchase one brand over another
  • Reveals customer perceptions of inter-brand differentiation
  • Analyzes customer-based brand equity to determine the appeal of a brand by specific market segments
  • Evaluates customer retention rate and average customer life on a per brand basis
  • Calculates a brand' s customer value score globally and for segmented customer profiles

Methodology

1054 scientists completed a 29-question survey conducted by BioInformatics, LLC (Arlington, Virginia, USA) between March 30 and April 6, 2006.

The electronic questionnaire was fielded to registered members of The Science Advisory Board. BioInformatics sponsors The Science Advisory Board, an online community of more than 29,000 scientists, physicians and healthcare professionals from around the world. The Science Advisory Board is divided into two panels (Research and Clinical) and “convenes” regularly via the World Wide Web to voice their opinions on a wide variety of issues relating to biomedical research and clinical technologies. These experts- representing all aspects of the life sciences and medicine- have agreed to make themselves available to participate in our online research activities. The Science Advisory Board members who participated in this study were drawn from the Board' s Research Panel.

Utilizing six key analyses to explore brand differentiation and evaluate the market share of the top 17 life science corporate brands, this report

  • Develops in-depth customer profiles based upon detailed segmentation for each brand
  • Estimates market share for each brand using a set of hierarchical customer-based factors
  • Assesses brand personality as a critical determinant of value creation and brand differentiation
  • Examines market factor(s) that influence a customer' s decision to purchase one brand over another
  • Reveals customer perceptions of inter-brand differentiation
  • Analyzes customer-based brand equity to determine the appeal of a brand
  • Measures each brand' s customer value

Table of Contents

Section 1. Analysis and Interpretation of Survey Results

  • Executive Overview
  • Study Objectives
  • Life Science Brand Usage
  • 5 Elements of Brand Health
    • Standing
    • Status
    • Perception
    • Profitability
    • Strength
  • Conclusion

Section 2. Study Methodology and Demographics

  • Executive Overview
  • Study Objectives
  • Life Science Brand Usage

Section 3. Presentation of Survey Data

[Note: Data is from respondents who have used each brand.]

  • Brand Usage
    • Brands currently used
  • Brand Experience (by brand)
    • Percentage of life science laboratory budget spend per brand
    • Number of years products from each brand have been used by customers
    • Perceived usefulness of products to customers' research
    • Familiarity with products
    • Satisfaction with the benefits of products
  • Purchasing Behavior (by brand)
    • Acceptability of prices of products
    • Convenience of obtaining products
    • Helpfulness of customer service
    • Helpfulness of technical support
    • Recency of last order placed by customers' labs
  • Brand Comparisons (by brand)
    • Degree of similarity/difference in customers' comparisions of each of 17 brands
  • Brand Personality (by brand)
    • Evaluation of brand 15 personality traits of brands
    • Descriptiveness of each trait in portraying each brand
  • Brand Satisfaction (by brand)
    • Satisfaction with 9 attributes of products from each brand
    • Overall satisfaction with products from each brand
    • Frequency that each brand offers critical advantages that other brands do not
    • Likelihood of recommending brand used to colleagues
  • Demographics
    • Years conducting research
    • Role in selection of consumables used in lab
    • Role in selection of instrumentation
    • Annual operational lab research budget in 2006
    • Percentage of research budget devoted to capital equipment
    • Total researchers in respondents' lab or group
    • Total researcher in respondents' organization
    • Gender, Age, Market Segment, Job Position, Geographic Region
    • Areas of research

Section 4. Appendices

  • Insights and Perspectives
  • Cross-Tabulations of Survey Data
  • Differentiation Charts by Brand
  • Share Index Tables by Brand
  • Satisfaction Quadrants by Brand
  • Other Publications
  • About BioInformatics
  • Our Valued Clients
Back to Top