INTRODUCTION
STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
This report focuses on polymer nanocomposites and their uses. There has been
enormous interest in the commercialization of nanocomposites for a variety of
applications, and a number of these applications already can be found in the
marketplace.
For decades, mineral fillers, metals and fibers have been added
to thermoplastics and thermosets to form composites. Compared to neat resins,
these composites have a number of improved properties including tensile
strength, heat distortion temperature and modulus. Thus for structural
applications, composites have become very popular and are sold in billion-pound
quantities. These filled thermoplastics are sold in even larger volumes than
neat thermoplastics.
Furthermore, the volume of fillers sold roughly equals
the volume of thermoplastic resin sold. Clearly, the idea of adding fillers to
thermoplastics and thermosets to improve properties, and in some cases decrease
costs, has been very successful for many years.
Thermoplastics have become
part of the fabric of modern life. Billions of pounds of these materials are
sold annually, and the rate of thermoplastic production is increasing. These
materials are ubiquitous and found in homes, cars, offices, and a host of other
places. Thermoplastics have grown in acceptance in our society because they
perform well for their cost.
More recently, advances in synthetic techniques
and the ability to characterize materials readily on an atomic scale have lead
to interest in nanometer-size materials, e.g., grains, fibers and plates. They
have dramatically increased surface area compared to conventional-size
materials, and the chemistry of nanosize materials is altered in comparison to
conventional materials.
Polymer nanocomposites combine composites and
nanometer size materials. Thermoplastics filled with nanometer size materials
have properties different from thermoplastics filled with conventional
materials. Some of these properties, such as increased tensile strength, may be
achieved by using higher conventional filler loading at the expense of increased
weight and decreased gloss. Other properties, such as clarity or improved
barriers, cannot be duplicated by filled resins at any loading.
Polymer
nanocomposites were developed in the late 1980s by both commercial research
organizations and academic laboratories. Toyota was the first company to
commercialize these nanocomposites, and it used nanocomposite parts in one of
its popular models for several years. Following Toyota's lead, a number of other
companies also began investigating nanocomposites.
Most of the commercial
interest in nanocomposites has been focused on thermoplastics. They can be
broken into two groups: less expensive commodity resins and the more expensive
(and higher performance) engineering resins. One of the goals of nanocomposites
was to permit substitution of more expensive engineering resins with a
less-expensive commodity resin nanocomposite. Substituting a nanocomposite
commodity resin with equivalent performance as a more expensive engineering
resin should yield overall cost savings.
Using a strict definition of
nanocomposites, i.e., any filler submicron in size, there already are
significant volumes of nanocomposites being produced (probably more than 100
million pounds). However, the fillers, carbon black, fumed silica and calcium
carbonate, do not alter the performance of the composite dramatically when
compared to conventional size fillers. Furthermore, these materials have been
known and used for decades. Often, particles used in composites are agglomerates
of smaller particles. This was unknown until microscopy developed to the point
where it could characterize these particles more fully.
Much of the research
interest in nanocomposites was jump-started by the National Nanotechnology
Initiative (NNI). More research money was provided by this initiative than was
spent on the Human Genome Project. For example, NNI funding exceeded $600
million in 2003 and continues to increase.
The goals of the NNI have been
adopted by many nanotechnology researchers (who are looking for funding, of
course):
- Research and technology development at the atomic, molecular or
macromolecular levels, in the length scale of approximately 1 nanometer to
100 nanometer range.
- Creating and using structures, devices and systems that have novel
properties and functions because of their small and/or intermediate size.
- Ability to control or manipulate on the atomic scale; nanotechnology
implies that new materials and applications are being developed to
specifically exploit the properties found in this size range.
Consequently, this report excludes composites made from conventional
materials, even if they are composed of particles that meet the strict
dictionary size definition of nanoparticles.
At this point in time, there has
been much less open commercial interest in thermoset nanocomposites compared to
thermoplastics. Yet thermoplastics have been able to dominate a major coating
market in a relatively short time frame.
Nanocomposites have proven to be more
difficult to manufacture than first anticipated, but new materials in pilot
plants and laboratories may be able to live up to much of their initial promise.
Greater understanding of the chemistry driving the formation of nanocomposites
has enabled researchers to discover practical production methods for these
materials.
Nanocomposites offer improvements in several of the properties of
thermoplastics including tensile strength, modulus, barrier and heat distortion
temperature. If a nanocomposite could offer these improvements at no additional
cost, then it quickly would replace a large percentage of unfilled
thermoplastics. Unfortunately, improved performance of a nanocomposite compared
to a thermoplastic comes with an increase in price.
Therefore, replacement
will not come on a wholesale basis, but will take place in applications where
improved performance of a nanocomposite justifies the price increase.
Nanocomposites are not going to be commodity materials. They are specialty
materials that will carry a price premium for the foreseeable future.
Since
nanocomposites will not completely replace any particular unfilled resin, over
the next 5 years, amounts of nanocomposites will be modest by thermoplastic
standards. However, nanocomposites already are produced in multimillion-pound
quantities and these applications should increase dramatically during the next
half-decade.
This report summarizes and describes current nanocomposite
products, and covers some of the future developments involving these materials.
It also covers a number of applications for these nanocomposites, and estimates
possible future markets for them.
Armed with this information, readers with
business interests then can make sound judgments regarding marketing strategies,
investment decisions, or strategic plans concerning markets for polymer
nanocomposites. This report was written to be readily accessible for readers
with a business background, but accuracy concerning the technical aspects of
polymer nanocomposite manufacture has not been sacrificed.
REASONS FOR DOING THE STUDY
While there has been considerable ballyhoo in the popular press regarding the
wonders of polymer nanocomposites, it is difficult to get solid information on
how many of these nanocomposites are being produced and sold. Furthermore, many
articles have presented wildly misleading information concerning the
manufacture, markets and applications of these materials. This report offers a
timely picture of trends in polymer nanocomposites that cannot be obtained from
other sources.
CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY
This report discusses the current and future sizes of the polymer
nanocomposite market on a global basis. The U.S. is, and probably will remain,
the dominant producer and one of the world's largest markets for polymer
nanocomposites. Thus, there is a heavy focus on trends in this country.
Readers
of this report will be able to distinguish the hype concerning the uses of
polymer nanocomposites from the reality of the market. A number of potentially
significant markets for polymer nanocomposites have received relatively little
press, and many of the published articles concerning uses of these materials do
not provide an accurate picture.
SCOPE AND FORMAT
To generate the information required to construct a reasonable future market
for polymer nanocomposites, it is necessary to take a hard look at the potential
advantages and pitfalls of the current crop of these materials as compared to
conventionally filled polymers. This report does not delve into the likelihood
of exotic new forms of transportation. instead, it is restricted to the possible
replacement of existing conventional materials with polymer nanocomposites.
Possible applications of nanocomposite materials within the next 5 years also
are discussed.
This report features two types of polymer nanocomposites:
- Thermoplastic: these materials are broken into two major categories, i.e.,
commodity resins and engineering resins; the potential of polymer
nanocomposite commodity resin is covered by filler types such as nanoclays,
nanotubes and metal oxides.
- Thermoset nanocomposites: these have received less commercial interest
during their development than have thermoplastic nanocomposites, but the
materials have been more straightforward to produce.
The report is broken into five sections. First there is a technology overview
that gives the broad details of polymer nanocomposites, along with some of their
physical properties and methods of manufacture. Next there is an extensive
description of the industry that is developing polymer nanocomposites including
clay manufacturers, nanotube manufacturers, metal oxide filler manufacturers,
thermoplastic resin producers, and compounders, along with company profiles. The
products section covers nanocomposites by filler type, along with relevant
resins for each nanocomposite. The report concludes with a market applications
section that covers the likely trends over the next 5 years.
METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION SOURCES
This report is the end result of 4 months of concerted effort by the author.
Primary information sources were interviews with several dozen people in
industry, academe and the government. The author also attended meetings and
conferences, and much precious insight was gained from these sources as well.
Many of the people interviewed are recognized authorities in the field, and
provided invaluable assistance. I would like to thank all who took the time to
speak with me for their help with this project.
Since this study was not
commissioned by any corporation or individual, the author's brief in writing it
was to be as objective as possible.
Secondary sources used for this report
include a number of publications issued by the federal government, as well as
items from the Internet, corporate literature and peer-reviewed literature.
Any
time an estimate of a number is made, the underlying assumptions are discussed.
Thus, if a reader chooses to interpret raw data in a different way, it is
possible to do so. Dollar amounts are in constant 2003 dollars, and average
annual growth rates (AAGRs) are calculated using standard tables.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
- STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
- REASONS FOR DOING THE STUDY
- CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY
- SCOPE AND FORMAT
- METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION SOURCES
- RELATED BCC PUBLICATIONS
- AUTHOR'S CREDENTIALS
SUMMARY
- Summary Table:
WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE FOR POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE, THROUGH 2008
(MILLIONS)
- Summary Figure:
WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE FOR POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE, 2003 AND 2008
($ MILLIONS)
TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
- WHAT IS A NANOCOMPOSITE?
- NANOCOMPOSITES AND CONVENTIONAL MATERIALS
- Table 1 ALTERED PROPERTIES OF NANOCOMPOSITES COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL
COMPOSITES
- TENSILE STRENGTH, MODULUS AND HEAT DISTORTION TEMPERATURE
- SPHERICAL AND OTHER FILLER GEOMETRIES
- CHANGES IN LIGHT ABSORPTION
- WHAT HAPPENS AT HIGHER NANOFILLER LOADINGS?
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 2 COMPARISON OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
- Performance Enhancements of Nanoclay Nanocomposites
- Table 3 COMPARISON OF NANOCLAY-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES WITH
MINERAL FILLED AND GLASS-FILLED POLYMERS
- First-generation Clay Nanocomposites
- Mixing Polar and Nonpolar Compounds
- Intercalation and Exfoliation
- Intercalated Nanocomposites
- Exfoliated Nanocomposites
- Why is it Hard to Fully Exfoliate Clays?
- Comparing Fully Exfoliated and Intercalated Nanocomposites
- Table 4 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITE PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY DEGREE OF
EXFOLIATION
- Table 5 REASONS WHY MONTMORILLONITE IS USED IN NANOCOMPOSITES
- The Montmorillonite Production Process
- Montmorillonite/Nylon Nanocomposites
- Other Montmorillonite Nanocomposites
- Surface-modified Montmorillonite
- Table 6 EFFECTS OF SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ON NATURAL CLAYS
- Surface Modification Technology
- Figure 1 RELATIVE ENERGIES OF FORMATION OF CARBON COMPOUNDS
- Single-wall and Multiwall Nanotubes
- Relevant Properties of Nanotubes
- Mineral Fillers (Continued)
- Table 7 COMPARISON OF FILLED THERMOPLASTICS BY FILLER SIZE
- Table 8 CALCIUM CARBONATE PROPERTIES
- Table 9 WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE OF SUBMICRON CALCIUM CARBONATE FILLED
THERMOPLASTICS*, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Conventional Calcium Carbonate Filled Thermoplastic
- THERMOSET NANOCOMPOSITES
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
- Table 10 FIRMS INVOLVED IN THE POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE INDUSTRY
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCO (CONTINUED)
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCO (CONTINUED)
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE THERMOPLASTICS NANOCOMPOSITES INDUSTRY
- A Brief History of the Thermoplastics Nanocomposites Industry
(Continued)
- TIME FRAMES FOR NANOCOMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT
- DRIVERS OF NANOCOMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT
- Table 11 DRIVERS OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT
- The Transition to Nanoparticles and Nanotubes
- FILLER MANUFACTURERS
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE NANOFILLER INDUSTRY
- Table 12 SELECTED NANOFILLER MANUFACTURERS
- A Brief History of the U.S. Nanoclay Industry
- Why the Masterbatch Plan Failed
- Table 13 REASONS WHY MASTERBATCH PRODUCTION WAS NOT ACCEPTED BY CLAY
PRODUCERS
- Excessively Large Expansion
- Disruption of Existing Supplier/Customer Relationships
- Current Clay Production Plans
- Surface Treatment of Montmorillonite
- Surface Treatment of Montmorillonite (Continued)
- Table 14 MAJOR NANOCLAY PRODUCERS BY CAPACITY, 1999 AND 2003 (MILLIONS OF
POUNDS)
- Conventional Filler Manufacturers
- Conventional Filler Manufacturers (Continued)
- Table 15 CONVENTIONAL AND NANOSIZE FILLER PRODUCERS
- The Calcium Carbonate Industry
- Table 16 TYPICAL CALCIUM CARBONATE PRICING BY PARTICLE SIZE
- Other Nanoparticle Production: Zinc Oxide and Magnesium Silicates
- Dedicated Nanoparticle Producers
- Table 17 POSSIBLE BUSINESS MODELS FOR NANOPARTICLE PRODUCERS
- Table 18 DEDICATED NANOSIZE FILLER PRODUCERS
- Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes
- Hyperion's Business Strategy
- Other Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Producers
- Single-wall Carbon Nanotubes (SWNT)
- Table 19 CARBON NANOTUBE PRODUCERS LINKED TO POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES
- RESIN MANUFACTURERS
- Rationale Behind Nanocomposite Development by Major Resin
Producers
- Table 20 REASONS FOR A MAJOR RESIN PRODUCER TO DEVELOP A NANOCOMPOSITE
- Protection of Existing Markets
- Typical Filled Resin Pricing
- Table 21 NANOCOMPOSITE PRICING COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL FILLED RESINS
- RESIN PRODUCERS IN THE NANOCOMPOSITE INDUSTRY
- Table 22 MAJOR RESIN PRODUCERS DEVELOPING NANOCOMPOSITES
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITE PRODUCTION
- Table 23 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES
- Advantages of Post Rresin Production
- Additional Compounds Used in Postproduction Processing
- Disadvantages of Compounding
- Table 24 NANOCOMPOSITES PROCESSED BY COMPOUNDING
- Disadvantages of In-reactor Technology
- Toyota's Nanocomposite Technology
- Monomer Modification Advantages
- Monomer Modification Disadvantages
- Table 25 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES, BY PRODUCTION TYPE, 2003-2008 (BY
VOLUME)
- COMPOUNDERS
- THE AUTOMOTIVE CONNECTION
- THERMOSETS
COMPANY PROFILES
- SOUTHERN CLAY PRODUCTS, INC.
- NANOCOR
- RTP
- GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- DUPONT
- DOW CHEMICAL CO.
- EASTMAN CHEMICAL CO.
- BASELL
- BAYER POLYMERS DIVISION
- HONEYWELL
- GM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- HYBRID PLASTICS
- DEGUSSA
- CABOT
- HYPERION CATALYSIS INTERNATIONAL
PRODUCTS
- Table 26 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE,
THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 2 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE,
2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF THERMOPLASTICS
- A Brief History of Thermoplastics (Continued)
- WHY IS THERE SUCH INTEREST IN NANOCOMPOSITES?
- Why Is There Such Interest in Nanocomposites? (Continued)
- NANOCOMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS
- Table 27 NANOCOMPOSITE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, 1999 AND 2004
- Resin/Filler Combinations
- TWO POSSIBLE PATHWAYS FOR NANOCOMPOSITES: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING
FILLED THERMOPLASTICS AND NEW APPLICATIONS
- TWO MAJOR TYPES OF NANOCOMPOSITES: CLAY FILLED AND NANOTUBE-FILLED
- Table 28 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
FILLER TYPES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 3 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
FILLER TYPES, 2003-2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- ORGANOCLAY-FILLED NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 29 COMPARISON OF NANOCOMPOSITES AND MINERAL-FILLED POLYMERS
- Heat Distortion Temperature
- Are Nanocomposites Really Lighter in Weight?
- Challenges Facing Nanocomposites in Exterior Applications
- Downgaging in Nanocomposites
- Flame Retardant Properties
- Flame Retardant Properties (Continued)
- CLAY-FILLED NANOCOMPOSITE TYPES
- Smectite and Bentonite Clays
- Table 30 PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS NANOCLAY TYPES
- Table 31 PROPERTIES OF MONTMORILLONITE-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES
- Natural vs. Surface Modified Clays
- Table 32 SURFACE TREATED CLAYS (%)
- First-generation Nanoclay Nanocomposites
- Second-generation Clay Nanocomposites
- Third-generation Nanocomposites
- Third-generation Nanocomposites (Continued)
- Surface Modifiers in Third-generation Nanocomposites
- Trends in Surface Modification
- Applications of Third-generation Nanocomposites
- ORGANOCLAY-FILLED NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN TYPE
- Table 33 COMPARISON OF NYLON 6 AND NYLON 6/ NANOCOMPOSITE (5%
MONTMORILLONITE)
- Heat Distortion Temperature
- Nylon Nanocomposite Markets
- Nylon Nanocomposite Applications
- Thermoplastic Olefins (TPOs)
- TPO Nanocomposite Pricing
- Table 34 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCLAY NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN
TYPE, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 4 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCLAY NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN
TYPE, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- ORGANOCLAY-FILLED NANOCOMPOSITE PRODUCT PATHWAYS
- What is Barrier Packaging?
- What is Barrier Packaging? (Continued)
- Table 35 COMPARISON OF NANOCOMPOSITES WITH CONVENTIONAL BARRIER PACKAGING
- Importance of the Brownish Tinge
- NANOTUBE-FILLED NANOCOMPOSITES
- The False Hope of Structural Composites
- Table 36 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT BY NANOTUBE FILLERS IN POLYMER MATRIXES
- Conductive Applications of Nanotube-Filled Polymers
- Production of Carbon Nanotube-filled Thermoplastics
- Conductivity: a Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite Success Story
- Conductive Polymer Technologies
- Table 37 COMPARISON OF FILLER TECHNOLOGY FOR STATIC DISSIPATIVE AND
CONDUCTIVE POLYMERS
- Ability to Adjust Conductivity
- Ability to Adjust Conductivity (Continued)
- Ease of Distribution into a Polymer
- Single-wall vs. Multiwall
- Table 38 COMPARING SINGLE-WALL AND MULTIWALL NANOTUBES FOR FILLED POLYMER
APPLICATIONS
- Table 39 HYPERION NANOTUBE-FILLED RESINS
- Table 40 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF MULTIWALL NANOTUBE-FILLED
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 5 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF MULTIWALL NANOTUBE-FILLED
NANOCOMPOSITES, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Dioxide
- Table 41 COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND NANOFILLED METAL OXIDE FILLERS
- Table 42 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF METAL OXIDE-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 43 COMPARISON OF METALS AND POLYMERS
- Table 44 COMPARISON OF NANOMETAL-FILLED AND CONVENTIONAL METAL-FILLED
POLYMERS
- SUMMARY OF NANOCOMPOSITES BY FILLER TYPE
- SUMMARY OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN TYPE
- Table 45 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
RESIN TYPE, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 6 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
RESIN TYPE, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- THERMOSET NANOCOMPOSITES
- Nanocor's High Tg Application
- Polyurethane Flooring Coatings
- Table 46 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCOMPOSITE THERMOPLASTIC COATING
MARKETS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 7 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCOMPOSITE THERMOPLASTIC COATING
MARKETS, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
MARKET APPLICATIONS
- Table 47 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE APPLICATIONS,
THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Figure 8 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE APPLICATIONS,
THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- REQUIREMENTS FOR NANOCOMPOSITE SUCCESS
- ECONOMIC AND LEGISLATIVE DRIVERS
- Table 48 THE IMPACT OF LEGISLATIVE AND ECONOMIC DRIVERS ON NANOCOMPOSITE
MARKETS
- Table 48 (CONTINUED)
- AUTOMOTIVE/LIGHT TRUCK APPLICATIONS
- NANOTUBE-FILLED POLYMER APPLICATIONS
- Table 49 COMPARISON OF MOLDED-IN COLOR AND PAINTED THERMOPLASTIC PARTS
- Brief History of Nanocomposite Use for Structural Automotive Parts
- Reasons to Use Nanocomposites for Automotive Applications
- Table 50 REQUIREMENTS FOR NANOCOMPOSITES USED IN AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
- How Do Nanocomposites Compare to Glass-filled Resins?
- How Do Nanocomposites Compare to Neat Resins?
- Markets for Structural Parts Using Nanoclay/TPO
- Incentives for Automotive Applications for Structural
Nanocomposites
- SUMMARY OF AUTOMOTIVE MARKETS FOR NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 51 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS FOR POLYMER
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- INDUSTRIAL/ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS FOR NANOCOMPOSITES
- STATIC DISSIPATIVE VS. CONDUCTIVE
- Table 52 COMPARISON OF STATIC DISSIPATIVE AND CONDUCTIVE POLYMERS
- Table 53 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS FOR POLYMER
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 54 WORLDWIDE NYLON AND NYLON NANOCOMPOSITE USE FOR BARRIER PACKAGING
APPLICATIONS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Drivers for Barrier Packaging Applications
- Table 55 COMPARISON OF GLASS AND PLASTIC USED FOR BEER PACKAGING
- Table 56 COMPARISON OF PLASTIC PACKAGING FOR BEER
- Polyethylene Napthalate (PEN)
- Summary of Materials for Beer Packaging
- The Beer Packaging Market
- Table 57 POSSIBLE U.S. MARKETS FOR PLASTIC BEER PACKAGING, 2003 AND 2008
(UNITS AND DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
- FLAME RETARDANT APPLICATIONS
- Table 58 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE FLAME
RETARDANT PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 59 U.S. WOOD FLOORING MARKETS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS OF SQUARE
FEET)
- FLOORING APPLICATIONS (CONTINUED)
LIST OF TABLES
- Summary Table:
WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE FOR POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE, THROUGH 2008
(MILLIONS)
- Table 1 ALTERED PROPERTIES OF NANOCOMPOSITES COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL
COMPOSITES
- Table 2 COMPARISON OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC COMPOUNDS
- Table 3 COMPARISON OF NANOCLAY-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES WITH
MINERAL FILLED AND GLASS-FILLED POLYMERS
- Table 4 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITE PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY DEGREE OF
EXFOLIATION
- Table 5 REASONS WHY MONTMORILLONITE IS USED IN NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 6 EFFECTS OF SURFACE MODIFICATIONS ON NATURAL CLAYS
- Table 7 COMPARISON OF FILLED THERMOPLASTICS BY FILLER SIZE
- Table 8 CALCIUM CARBONATE PROPERTIES
- Table 9 WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE OF SUBMICRON CALCIUM CARBONATE FILLED
THERMOPLASTICS*, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 10 FIRMS INVOLVED IN THE POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE INDUSTRY
- Table 11 DRIVERS OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT
- Table 12 SELECTED NANOFILLER MANUFACTURERS
- Table 13 REASONS WHY MASTERBATCH PRODUCTION WAS NOT ACCEPTED BY CLAY
PRODUCERS
- Table 14 MAJOR NANOCLAY PRODUCERS BY CAPACITY, 1999 AND 2003 (MILLIONS OF
POUNDS)
- Table 15 CONVENTIONAL AND NANOSIZE FILLER PRODUCERS
- Table 16 TYPICAL CALCIUM CARBONATE PRICING BY PARTICLE SIZE
- Table 17 POSSIBLE BUSINESS MODELS FOR NANOPARTICLE PRODUCERS
- Table 18 DEDICATED NANOSIZE FILLER PRODUCERS
- Table 19 CARBON NANOTUBE PRODUCERS LINKED TO POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 20 REASONS FOR A MAJOR RESIN PRODUCER TO DEVELOP A NANOCOMPOSITE
- Table 21 NANOCOMPOSITE PRICING COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL FILLED RESINS
- Table 22 MAJOR RESIN PRODUCERS DEVELOPING NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 23 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES
- Table 24 NANOCOMPOSITES PROCESSED BY COMPOUNDING
- Table 25 THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES, BY PRODUCTION TYPE, 2003-2008 (BY
VOLUME)
- Table 26 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE,
THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 27 NANOCOMPOSITE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, 1999 AND 2004
- Table 28 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
FILLER TYPES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 29 COMPARISON OF NANOCOMPOSITES AND MINERAL-FILLED POLYMERS
- Table 30 PROPERTIES OF VARIOUS NANOCLAY TYPES
- Table 31 PROPERTIES OF MONTMORILLONITE-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES
- Table 32 SURFACE TREATED CLAYS (%)
- Table 33 COMPARISON OF NYLON 6 AND NYLON 6/ NANOCOMPOSITE (5%
MONTMORILLONITE)
- Table 34 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCLAY NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN
TYPE, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 35 COMPARISON OF NANOCOMPOSITES WITH CONVENTIONAL BARRIER PACKAGING
- Table 36 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT BY NANOTUBE FILLERS IN POLYMER MATRIXES
- Table 37 COMPARISON OF FILLER TECHNOLOGY FOR STATIC DISSIPATIVE AND
CONDUCTIVE POLYMERS
- Table 38 COMPARING SINGLE-WALL AND MULTIWALL NANOTUBES FOR FILLED POLYMER
APPLICATIONS
- Table 39 HYPERION NANOTUBE-FILLED RESINS
- Table 40 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF MULTIWALL NANOTUBE-FILLED
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 41 COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND NANOFILLED METAL OXIDE FILLERS
- Table 42 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF METAL OXIDE-FILLED THERMOPLASTIC
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 43 COMPARISON OF METALS AND POLYMERS
- Table 44 COMPARISON OF NANOMETAL-FILLED AND CONVENTIONAL METAL-FILLED
POLYMERS
- Table 45 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
RESIN TYPE, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 46 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCOMPOSITE THERMOPLASTIC COATING
MARKETS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 47 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE APPLICATIONS,
THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 48 THE IMPACT OF LEGISLATIVE AND ECONOMIC DRIVERS ON NANOCOMPOSITE
MARKETS
- Table 49 COMPARISON OF MOLDED-IN COLOR AND PAINTED THERMOPLASTIC PARTS
- Table 50 REQUIREMENTS FOR NANOCOMPOSITES USED IN AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
- Table 51 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS FOR POLYMER
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 52 COMPARISON OF STATIC DISSIPATIVE AND CONDUCTIVE POLYMERS
- Table 53 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS FOR POLYMER
NANOCOMPOSITES, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 54 WORLDWIDE NYLON AND NYLON NANOCOMPOSITE USE FOR BARRIER PACKAGING
APPLICATIONS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 55 COMPARISON OF GLASS AND PLASTIC USED FOR BEER PACKAGING
- Table 56 COMPARISON OF PLASTIC PACKAGING FOR BEER
- Table 57 POSSIBLE U.S. MARKETS FOR PLASTIC BEER PACKAGING, 2003 AND 2008
(UNITS AND DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
- Table 58 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE FLAME
RETARDANT PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS)
- Table 59 U.S. WOOD FLOORING MARKETS, THROUGH 2008 (MILLIONS OF SQUARE
FEET)
LIST OF FIGURES
- Summary Figure:
WORLDWIDE VOLUME AND VALUE FOR POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE, 2003 AND 2008
($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 1 RELATIVE ENERGIES OF FORMATION OF CARBON COMPOUNDS
- Figure 2 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITES BY TYPE,
2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 3 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
FILLER TYPES, 2003-2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 4 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCLAY NANOCOMPOSITES BY RESIN
TYPE, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 5 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF MULTIWALL NANOTUBE-FILLED
NANOCOMPOSITES, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 6 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF THERMOPLASTIC NANOCOMPOSITES BY
RESIN TYPE, THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 7 WORLDWIDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF NANOCOMPOSITE THERMOPLASTIC COATING
MARKETS, 2003 AND 2008 ($ MILLIONS)
- Figure 8 WORLDIWDE VALUE AND VOLUME OF POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE APPLICATIONS,
THROUGH 2008 ($ MILLIONS)