首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊 > WLAN/WiMAX > 企業市場之微型細胞基地台及毫微微蜂巢式基地台的投資效果
產業/市場分類
通訊 (10971)
企業概況 (724)
光纖網路 (252)
次世代無線通信 (543)
行動用戶 (134)
行動設備 (735)
軟體 (996)
電子商務 (202)
網路 (624)
網路與進入設備 (257)
數位廣播 (307)
數據中心 (342)
寬頻 (388)
衛星遠程通信 (134)
線上廣告 (143)
整合 (197)
整合通訊 (292)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (130)
Contents (605)
IT安全性 (473)
IT委外 (300)
LBS (149)
NFC (146)
RFID (246)
Web服務 (459)
WLAN/WiMAX (557)
市場調查報告書

企業市場之微型細胞基地台及毫微微蜂巢式基地台的投資效果

The Business Case for Picocells and Femtocells in the Enterprise Market

出版商 Analysys Mason
出版日期 2007年11月 商品編碼 58323
內容資訊 英文  
價格
US $ 3039 Hard Copy including data annex
US $ 3039 PDF (5 User License) including data annex


企業市場之微型細胞基地台及毫微微蜂巢式基地台的投資效果 是由出版商Analysys Mason在2007年11月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金3039起跳。

目錄

Abstract

“Indoor base stations could enable existing and new mobile operators to provide the enterprise market with enhanced coverage, new services and attractive pricing of indoor mobile services. We show how to achieve a viable business case.”Dr. Alastair Brydon, Analysys Associate

The enterprise market presents an important revenue opportunity for mobile operators. However, the provision of indoor services is currently a major area of weakness. Mobile operators are increasingly threatened by the WLAN community' s development and deployment of dual-mode services, which are tempting enterprises with the promise of reduced expenditure on traditional telecoms. The report shows how the introduction of indoor base stations - picocells and femtocells - could allow mobile operators to fight back. The report assesses the business case for the deployment of indoor base stations in enterprises, for a number of scenarios. Although indoor base station deployment in the enterprise market is embryonic, the report reviews early service implementations by mobile operators, and identifies actions that mobile operators and indoor base station vendors must take in order to make the most of opportunities in the enterprise market.

The Business Case for Picocells and Femtocells in the Enterprise Market answers your key questions:

  • What are enterprises' key requirements for indoor services?
  • What can be learnt from early movers that are already deploying indoor base stations?
  • What are the key elements of the MNO business case for indoor base stations? What is the quantitative business case for a number of deployment scenarios? What user densities and ARPU levels are necessary in order to achieve an adequate financial return?
  • How can improvements in transmission costs improve business case viability?
  • Given that picocells represent an immediate deployment option, is there a role for femtocells in the enterprise market and, if so, how and when?
  • What are the critical ingredients, over and above the deployment of indoor base station equipment, needed for success?
  • How should MNOs compete against emerging WLAN services that use dual-mode handsets?
  • What actions should MNOs and indoor base station vendors take in order to seize the opportunities for indoor base stations in the enterprise market?

Who should read this report:

  • Existing mobile network operators: senior executives and enterprise solution managers, in order to understand the business case for picocells and enterprise in the enterprise market and to identify target market segments
  • Low-power GSM licence holders: senior executives and product managers, in order to assess the opportunity and understand the key requirements that will be needed to target enterprises with indoor service solutions based on picocells
  • Indoor base station vendors: senior executives and product managers, in order to identify key product requirements and how they should support mobile operators to address the enterprise market
  • Analysts and investors: in order to understand the potential for picocells and femtocells in the enterprise market.

Table of Contents

  • 0. Summary
  • 1. Deploying picocells and femtocells in the enterprise market will be challenging
  • 2. Indoor base stations could help MNOs to attract enterprises
    • 2.1 MNOs must not neglect the enterprise market
    • 2.2 The provision of indoor services is an area of weakness for MNOs
    • 2.3 Indoor base stations could enable MNOs to counter the threat of alternative solutions
    • 2.4 MNOs should strive to meet the challenging indoor service requirements of the business market
    • 2.5 MNOs should apply commerical logic to the deployment of indoor base stations
  • 3. Early movers are seizing opportunities with 2G picocells
    • 3.1 2G picocells are already commercially available and deployed
    • 3.2 Low-power GSM licences have been awarded in the UK and are suitable for picocell services
    • 3.3 Spring Mobil targets Swedish enterprises with picocell services
  • 4. ARPU and transmission costs underpin picocell service viability
    • 4.1 Current standalone picocell services require 30 users or more to achieve financial viability
    • 4.2 The most sensitive aspects of the business case are ARPU and transmission
    • 4.2 There is substantial value in targeting smaller businesses
  • 5. 3G femtocells have potential in very small businesses
    • 5.1 Opportunities for 3G femtocells exist beyond the consumer market
    • 5.2 3G femtocells could support non-voice services, but with possible transmission and capacity bottlenecks
    • 5.3 The potential for 3G femtocells to support greater user densities needs thorough investigation
  • 6. Enterprise solutions require a number of factors to succeed
    • 6.1 Indoor base station equipment is just one component of an enterprise solution
    • 6.2 MNOs must target the weaknesses of WLAN services

Actions

List of Figures and Tables

FIGURES:

  • Figure 0.1: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business case for indoor base station deployment in enterprises
  • Figure 2.1: The scope of enterprise mobility
  • Figure 2.2: Major revenue and cost elements of an MNO' s business case for indoor base station deployment in enterprises
  • Figure 4.1: Breakdown of cost to MNOs per user per month for an enterprise picocell solution, for different numbers of users
  • Figure 4.2: ARPU generated by an enterprise picocell service in three scenarios
  • Figure 4.3: Number of service users required by a picocell operator to achieve a 10% revenue margin, given three different transmission solutions
  • Figure 5.1: Incremental ARPU per month in two enterprise femtocell service scenarios
  • Figure 5.2: Cost per user per month in two enterprise femtocell service scenarios
  • Figure 6.1: Estimated up-front investment cost per user for a WLAN VoIP solution

TABLES:

  • Table 2.1: The scope of enterprise mobility
  • Table 3.1: Bids for low-power GSM licences in the UK
  • Table 5.1: Typical average downlink throughput of GSM and W-CDMA family of cellular technologies in different environments
  • Table 5.2: Two enterprise femtocell scenarios that achieve satisfactory financial return
Back to Top