首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
- English Japanese Korean
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊 > 寬頻 > 行動通訊業者的固定寬頻策略
產業/市場分類
通訊 (10959)
企業概況 (724)
光纖網路 (252)
次世代無線通信 (542)
行動用戶 (134)
行動設備 (733)
軟體 (996)
電子商務 (202)
網路 (623)
網路與進入設備 (257)
數位廣播 (307)
數據中心 (342)
寬頻 (388)
衛星遠程通信 (134)
線上廣告 (143)
整合 (197)
整合通訊 (292)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (130)
Contents (604)
IT安全性 (472)
IT委外 (300)
LBS (147)
NFC (146)
RFID (245)
Web服務 (458)
WLAN/WiMAX (557)
市場調查報告書

行動通訊業者的固定寬頻策略

Mobile Operator Strategies for Fixed Broadband

出版商 Analysys Mason
出版日期 2007年02月 商品編碼 50358
內容資訊 英文  
價格
US $ 3145 PowerPoint File by E-mail (5 User License) & Excel Data File


行動通訊業者的固定寬頻策略 是由出版商Analysys Mason在2007年02月所出版的。 這份英文市場調查報告書價格從美金3145起跳。

簡介

擁有豐富通訊及媒體領域相關調查和顧問服務經驗的英國市調公司 Analysys Ltd.(總公司:Cambridge),針對行動通訊業者的固定寬頻策略進行調查分析,並出版經系統整理的報告書 "Mobile Operator Strategies for Fixed Broadband"

本報告書內容包括:行動通訊業者提供固定寬頻服務的好處、提供技術(HSPA、3G LTE、WiMAX、DSL、有線電纜)的適合度、LLUB、合作、合併等DSL的安裝方式、其他促成有效提供固定寬頻服務的因素等。內容綱要摘記如下:

摘要

第1章 關於提供固定寬頻服務的電信業者的決策

第2章 提供固定寬頻服務的正當性

  • 隨著競爭愈來愈激烈,苦於無法順利增加收益的行動通訊業者
  • 多數的行動通訊業者都有提供固定寬頻服務
  • 固定寬頻服務為行動通訊業者帶來許多好處
  • 固定寬頻服務的利潤高
  • 行動通訊業者為了改善ARPU及解約率,應將全力放在固定寬頻服務上

第3章 DSL:寬頻服務中的最適當短期選擇

  • 有幾個提供固定寬頻服務的技術選擇
  • 網路的情況,則有W-CDMA及HSPA可以選擇,但是其效果和成本受到侷限
  • 3G LTE雖可應付現在DSL服務的容量,但是需要等到2009年前才可望完全普及
  • 先進國家當中,WiMAX的發展狀況不盡理想
  • 高品質的固定寬頻技術當中DSL最適合
  • 有線電纜技術也可成為替代DSL的技術,但是覆蓋率和規範尚未完善
  • 長期的選擇有必要公開化

第4章 安裝DSL的選擇:位元資料流連線、LLUB、合作、合併

  • DSL服務的安裝方法有好幾種選擇
  • 轉售是可行的,但發展有限
  • 位元資料流連線:彈性的服務設計和小規模的投資金額雖然很具吸引力,但相對的獲益也較低
  • LLUB與DSL比較獲益雖較高,但需要大規模的投資,風險也較高
  • 與既有的寬頻服務業者合作或合併:可以快速打進寬頻市場
  • 對行動通訊業者而言最適合的DSL策略因規模及市場特徵而不同

第5章 電信業者行銷寬頻服務的必要性

  • 與其重視價格,更應重視藉由服務的差異化去吸引顧客
  • 內容豐富的行銷計畫有其必要
  • 藉由提供固定語音服務抵抗來自固定通訊業者的威脅
  • 到目前為止,行動通訊業者提供固定寬頻服務的前景相當看好

行動方案

圖表

目錄

Abstract

“Mobile operators are currently struggling to grow voice ARPU, and non-voice ARPU remains stubbornly low for many. Fixed broadband services represent a new source of revenue growth and a means of reducing churn. Mobile operators just need to find the best way of delivering such services.”Dr Mark Heath, Analysys Associate.

With mobile penetration reaching saturation, mobile operators need to find ways to grow ARPU in order to maintain overall revenue growth. However, mobile operators are finding it difficult to maintain voice ARPU and few have managed to achieve significant increases in non-voice revenue. Fixed broadband services could be a means of growing revenue, while also bringing in other benefits. A number of mobile operators have already launched fixed broadband services, or have signalled their intention to do so - but this is a big step. Most operators still need to answer important questions about whether they should offer such services and, if so, how they should be implemented.

Mobile Operator Strategies for Fixed Broadband answers your key questions:

  • Do mobile operators really need to offer fixed broadband services, and why? What are the benefits?
  • What are the practical technology options available to a mobile operator wishing to deliver fixed broadband access, and which is the most appropriate in the short-term? The report evaluates cellular (HSPA and 3G LTE), WiMAX, DSL and cable technologies.
  • Given that DSL services can be implemented in different ways, for example through resale, bitstream access and LLUB, what should mobile operators do? How do the economics of the different options stack up?
  • What other factors must mobile operators consider in order to implement a successful fixed broadband service?

Who should read this report

  • Mobile network operators: senior executives, technology strategists and product managers, in order to evaluate the importance of fixed broadband services, to identify the technical options and their commercial characteristics (and learn how to evaluate them) and to assess the service requirements.
  • Incumbent and alternative fixed network operators: senior executives and wholesale product managers, in order to understand the competitive threat from mobile operators and also to assess the opportunities to sell wholesale services to mobile operators to enable them to deliver broadband services to the mass market.
  • Regulators: senior executives, in order to understand the likely actions and requirements of mobile operators in the fixed broadband market.
  • Equipment vendors: product managers, in order to understand mobile operator' s requirements for products and services to deliver broadband (or converged) services to the mass market.
  • Financial analysts and investors: in order to understand the financial implications of mobile operators offering fixed broadband services.

Table of Contents

0. Summary

1. Mobile operators must decide whether and how to offer fixed broadband services

2. There is strong justification for offering fixed broadband services, if they can be delivered profitably

  • 2.1 In an increasingly competitive environment, many mobile operators are failing to achieve significant revenue growth
  • 2.2 A growing number of mobile operators offer fixed broadband services
  • 2.3 Fixed broadband services can benefit mobile operators in several ways
  • 2.4 Fixed broadband services must generate significant revenue and must be delivered profitably
  • 2.5 Mobile operators need to achieve good take-up of fixed broadband if they are to improve ARPU and churn significantly

3. DSL is the best short-term option for broadband services

  • 3.1 Mobile operators have the choice of several technologies for delivery of fixed broadband services
  • 3.2 W-CDMA and HSPA could be used now to offer Internet access but have limitations in performance and cost
  • 3.3 3G LTE may be able to match the capability of current DSL services but will not be widely deployed before 2009
  • 3.4 The business case for WiMAX is weak in developed markets
  • 3.5 DSL is the best way to provide high-performance fixed broadband services immediately
  • 3.6 Cable technologies represent an alternative to DSL but lack the same coverage and regulation
  • 3.7 Mobile operators need to keep their options open for the longer term

4. Options for DSL implementation include bitstream access, LLUB, partnership and acquisition

  • 4.1 Mobile operators can implement their own DSL services in various ways
  • 4.2 Resale is simple but offers little scope for service differentiation or profit
  • 4.3 Bitstream access allows flexibility in service design and requires limited investment but profit margins may be small
  • 4.4 LLUB can achieve higher profitability than other DSL solutions but involves greater investment and risk
  • 4.5 Partnering with or buying an existing broadband service provider enables rapid entry to the broadband market
  • 4.6 For mobile operators offering DSL, the best short-term solution depends on their size and market characteristics

5. Operators must appeal to the mass market with strong marketing of attractive broadband services

  • 5.1 Mobile operators need to attract broadband customers by focusing on service differentiation rather than price competition
  • 5.2 High-profile marketing will be necessary to achieve significant take-up of broadband services
  • 5.3 Offering fixed voice services can counter the threat from fixed operators but may have an impact on mobile usage
  • 5.4 Mobile operators must avoid alarming customers by presenting them with a single large bill
  • 5.5 The prospects are bright for mobile operators that embrace the opportunities in fixed broadband services now

Figures and tables

  • Figure 0.1: Total annual cost of delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access and number of exchanges that it is profitable for a large mobile operator to unbundle
  • Figure 0.2: Total annual cost of delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access and number of exchanges that it is profitable for a small mobile operator to unbundle
  • Figure 2.1: Voice ARPU for selected mobile operators in major Western European markets, June 2004 to December 2006
  • Figure 2.2: Non-voice ARPU for selected mobile operators in major Western European markets, June 2004 to December 2006
  • Figure 2.3: Household penetration of broadband services in selected countries in Western Europe, September 2001 to September 2006
  • Figure 2.4: The impact on Vodafone UK' s overall ARPU of various levels of take-up and monthly fee for the Vodafone At Home service, based on the quarter ended September 2006
  • Figure 2.5: The impact on Vodafone UK' s churn of various levels of take-up of the Vodafone At Home service, based on the quarter ended September 2006
  • Figure 3.1: Impact of pricing and monthly usage on revenue per megabyte for HSPA Internet access
  • Figure 3.2: Comparison of maximum monthly usage per user that could be supported profitably by typical implementations of W-CDMA, HSPA and 3G LTE, for monthly revenues of EUR15 and EUR25
  • Figure 3.3: Western European broadband subscribers, 2006- 10
  • Figure 4.1: Average monthly cost per broadband subscriber for a typical DSL service in the UK, using bitstream access and LLUB
  • Figure 4.2: Total annual cost of delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access and number of exchanges that it is profitable for a large mobile operator to unbundle
  • Figure 4.3: Cost per broadband user per month for a large mobile operator delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access
  • Figure 4.4: Total annual cost of delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access and number of exchanges that it is profitable for a small mobile operator to unbundle
  • Figure 4.5: Cost per broadband user per month for a small mobile operator delivering DSL services by LLUB and bitstream access
  • Table 2.1: Examples of mobile-only operators offering fixed broadband services
  • Table 2.2: EBITDA margins for selected T-Mobile operations, quarter ending June 2006
  • Table 3.1: Evaluation of technologies that could be used to deliver fixed broadband services for mobile operators
  • Table 3.2: Evaluation of 3G technologies that mobile operators might use to deliver Internet access services
  • Table 4.1: Comparison of mobile operators' options for offering DSL services
  • Table 5.1: Examples of mobile operators' pricing for bundled fixed broadband services, February 2007
Back to Top