首頁 產業/市場分類 出版商一覽 Email 通知 GII媒體代理會議 公司簡介 聯絡我們
首頁 > 市場調查報告書 > 通訊 > IT安全性 > 原則管理系統與DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)技術市場展望
產業/市場分類
通訊 (11616)
企業概況 (774)
光纖網路 (265)
次世代無線通信 (543)
行動用戶 (129)
行動設備 (764)
軟體 (1034)
電子商務 (209)
網路 (677)
網路與進入設備 (268)
數位廣播 (305)
數據中心 (345)
寬頻 (392)
衛星遠程通信 (141)
線上廣告 (144)
整合 (177)
整合通訊 (305)
機上盒 (63)
聯繫中心 (135)
Contents (627)
IT安全性 (503)
IT委外 (323)
LBS (160)
NFC (152)
RFID (215)
Web服務 (554)
WLAN/WiMAX (568)
市場調查報告書

原則管理系統與DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)技術市場展望

Policy Management and Deep Packet Inspection Outlook

出版商 Analysys Mason
出版日期 2010年01月 商品編碼 114225
內容資訊 英文  
價格
本報告書已不再販售

本報告已在2012年05月03日停止出版。

簡介

本研究報告針對原則管理系統與DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)技術市場進行調查分析,包括通訊市場商業模型的變化與複合原則管理策略的必要性、原則管理系統市場規模實績與預測(∼2013年)、主要企業的系統/技術導入案例研究、主要供應商檔案、給CSP與供應商的建議等情報,內容摘記如下。

實施概要

市場預測

市場成長促進因素・阻礙因素

  • 成長促進因素
  • 成長阻礙因素
    • 帶域管理與庸塞的形成
    • 網路成本控制
    • 標的化廣告
    • 標的廣告
    • 應用程式・服務的優先
    • 網路整合
    • 手機寬頻數據的成長
    • IP網路的合法干擾
    • 遵守歐盟規定的漫遊費
    • 避免與監測網路威脅
    • 法規的不確定性
    • 對隱私權的關注
    • 組織障礙

商業環境

  • 案例研究
    • Plusnet
    • NTT
    • SK Broadband
    • Chunghwa Telecom
    • Orange Israel
    • Asian Regulator

導入方案

  • 住宅用寬頻
  • 手機寬頻
  • 開放API與嵌入DPI技術實現多廠商政策管理
  • 統整服務

市場定義

政策管理供應商摘要

政策管理供應商

建議

  • 給CSP的建議
  • 給供應商的建議

圖表

目錄

Abstract

“The overall policy management market will grow from USD876 million in 2008 to USD2.62 billion in 2013 at a CAGR of 27%.” Patrick Kelly, Research Director; Glen Ragoonanan, Senior Analyst.

Investments in policy management software have taken on greater significance with the explosion of bandwidth-intensive applications, such as P2P, video and gaming applications, and advances in smart phones - most notably the iPhone. At the same time, business models are evolving that require more controls in the delivery and charging of services.

The value of policy-management systems and the use of deep packet inspection (DPI) technology will be deployed as an effective management and network enforcement technology to prioritise traffic, generate new sources of revenue, thwart network disruptions and meet more-stringent regulations on roaming. Communications service providers (CSPs) in all regions of the world and across residential broadband, mobile and enterprise business services are implementing policy management systems to enhance services using next-generation network technologies.

Policy management software systems will evolve from single-function to multi-function solutions that support subscriber management, policy and charging control and class of service. Analysys Mason forecasts that the overall policy management market will grow from USD876 million in 2008 to USD2.62 billion in 2013 at a CAGR of 27%.

This 41-page report focuses on the use of policy management and DPI technology as business models change from flat-rate tariff plans towards tiered services and personalised subscriber data management. We evaluate different stages of market development, from specialty appliance point solutions to a more-comprehensive policy management strategy that addresses the needs of network quality of service, traffic shaping, targeted advertising, compliance with regulatory agencies and lawful intercept for IP networks. The report examines effective-use case studies in the residential broadband and mobile data segments of the market.

This use of DPI as a technology will also shape the evolution of software systems focused on next-generation subscriber data management, and on real-time charging. This report complements the research we have published in the subscriber data management and real-time charging segments. It provides forecast data, scenarios that evaluate CSPs' deployments in the current business environment and an examination of the market drivers and leading suppliers in this segment.

Table of Contents

Executive summary

Forecast

Market drivers

  • Drivers
  • Inhibitors
    • Bandwidth management and traffic shaping
  • Control network cost
  • Targeted advertisement
  • Prioritize applications and services
  • Network convergence
  • Mobile broadband data growth
  • Lawful intercept for IP networks
  • Comply to EU regulation on roaming charges
  • Network threat detection and avoidance
  • Regulatory uncertainty
  • Privacy concerns
  • Organizational barriers
  • Business environment
    • Case studies
      • Plusnet
      • NTT Plala.
      • SK Broadband
      • Chunghwa Telecom
      • Orange Israel
      • Asian Regulator
  • Deployment scenarios
    • Residential broadband
    • Mobile broadband
    • Multi-vendor policy management enabled by open APIs and embedded DPI technology
    • Converged Services
  • Market definition
    • Deep packet inspection
    • DPI element manager
    • Policy management software
    • Policy and charging control (PCC)
    • Evolved packet core
    • Subscriber data management (SDM)
  • Policy management vendor summaries
    • Alcatel-Lucent
    • Allot Communications
    • Amdocs
    • Arbor Networks
    • Bivio Networks
    • Bridgewater Systems
    • Camiant
    • Cisco
    • CloudShield Technologies
    • Ericsson
    • Fortinet
    • HP
    • Huawei
    • IBM
    • Juniper
    • Kabira
    • Nokia Siemens Networks
    • Openet
    • Oracle
    • Procera Networks
    • Sandvine
    • Starent Networks
    • Telcordia
  • Policy management suppliers
  • Recommendations
    • Recommendations for CSPs
    • Recommendations for vendors

List of figures

  • Figure 1: 2008-2013 Policy management software systems forecast
  • Figure 2: 2008-2013 Policy management forecast
  • Figure 3: 2008-2013 Policy management forecast by application segment
  • Figure 4: 2008-2013 Global IP traffic forecast
  • Figure 5: Mobile data usage by top applications by region, Q2 2009
  • Figure 6: DPI scenario deployment today in residential broadband
  • Figure 7: DPI scenario deployment today in mobile broadband
  • Figure 8: Mass market DPI adoption scenario supported by multi-vendor policy management systems
  • Figure 9: Late stage DPI scenario deployment in converged network
  • Figure 10: Policy management and supporting systems

List of tables

  • Table 1: Comparison of Policy Management Solutions
Back to Top