|
Thursday,
March 27
7:00am Registration
(Open until
5:30pm)

8:20am Chairperson's Remarks
Judith K. Marquis, Ph.D., Group Vice
President, Pharmacology &
Preclinical Development, Genzyme Corp.
8:30 Challenges of Doxercalciferol, a
Prodrug of a Potent Vitamin D Hormone
Joyce Knutson, Ph.D., Senior Director of
Research, Bone Care
International
Doxercalciferol is a
potent compound (therapeutic dose in micrograms), that is inactive
until metabolized in the liver to an active form (circulating
concentration pg/mL) that is also an endogenous compound.
Bioanalytical challenges were compounded by species differences in
sensitivity and gender differences in metabolism. Anticipation and
proactive actions to overcome these preclinical challenges
resulted in the successful development of doxercalciferol for
treating dialysis patients for secondary hyperparathyroidism.
9:00 Predicting the Undesirable
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Small Molecules on Physiological
Function: From the Brain to the Heart
Vivek Kadambi, Ph.D., Director of
Drug Safety Evaluation, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
This presentation will
focus on two case studies which have shown a good correlation
between the effects observed in nonclincial studies and in humans.
Case study 1 will focus on the CNS effects relating to sedation
and somnolence. Case study 2 will focus on the electrophysiologic
effects on the cardiac conduction system.
9:30 GMX1777 Case Study: Using
Metabolomics to Determine the Mechanism of Action of an
Anti-Cancer Compound
Anne Roulston Ph.D., Group Leader, Cancer
Biology, Gemin X Biotechnologies Inc., Canada
GMX1777 is a soluble
prodrug of the pharmacologically active compound GMX1778.
Initiation of Phase I clinical trials began in patients with
refractory solid tumors and lymphomas. We have since discovered
that GMX1778 functions by inhibiting nicotinamide phosphoribosyl
transferase (NAMPRT), an enzyme involved in nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide (oxidized) (NAD+) biosynthesis. The approach used to
identify the key mechanism of action of GMX1778 and the new
opportunities this information provides for the clinical
development of GMX1777 will be discussed.
10:00 Technology Spotlight (Sponsorship
Available)
10:15 Technology Spotlight (Sponsorship
Available)
10:30 Poster Competition &
Refreshment Break in the Exhibit Hall
11:30 Discovery and Development of
AMD3100 as a Stem Cell Mobilizer
Ron T. MacFarland, Ph.D., Senior
Director, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Anormed Pharmaceuticals
AMD3100 is a small
molecule inhibitor of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and blocks
binding of its cognate ligand SDF-1. AMD3100 was originally
discovered in an antiviral drug screening program, and its initial
development directed towards use in the treatment of HIV
infection. Transient increases in white blood cell counts observed
in humans following AMD3100 administration, combined with an
understanding of the role of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis in blood cell
homing and maturation in the bone marrow prompted investigation
and subsequent development of AMD3100 for use as a stem cell
mobilizing agent.
12:00pm The Importance of Integrating
Disciplines to Increase the Probability of Successful Drug
Development
Cindy Berman, Ph.D., Independent
Consultant
Several examples will be
presented of cross-species pharmacological responsiveness for
small molecules that can be extended to selection of a clinical
starting dose. Toxicity will be discussed as it relates to
non-specific effects. Potential PK differences between normal and
disease conditions (in vitro, animal, or human) will be compared,
as well as the importance of understanding whether a drug receptor
is up or down regulated in the disease condition. Potential "tox"
differences between normals and patients will be described,
emphasizing the importance of understanding the clinical
population and testing for toxicity in an appropriate model.
|
|
|
12:30 Presentation I Sponsored
by
|

|
1:00 Presentation (Sponsorship
Available)
|

1:45 Chairperson's Remarks
Carl L. Alden, Ph.D., Vice President,
Preclinical Development & Drug Safety Evaluation, Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1:50 Integration of Novel Technologies
in Discovery and Early Development Toxicology
Eric A. G. Blomme, D.V.M., Ph.D.,
Diplomate A.C.V.P., Project Leader, Abbott Laboratories
Toxicity represents an
important cause of failure in the late stages of discovery and
preclinical development. Therefore, early identification of the
toxic liabilities of experimental compounds represents one of the
most promising alternatives to decrease overall R&D costs. In
this presentation, we will review our current Discovery toxicology
strategy that leverages several new methodologies in an effort to
characterize the toxicologic profile of compounds at early stages.
Using specific examples, we will illustrate how this approach can
be successfully implemented in a discovery or preclinical
organization.
2:20 A Lead Optimization and Early
Development Toxicology Strategy Specific to Novel Oncology
Targets
Carl L. Alden, Ph.D., Vice President,
Preclinical Development & Drug Safety Evaluation,
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Discovery stage and early
nonclinical development toxicology studies in the oncology
therapeutic area present unique challenges in predicting for
success in the clinic, relative to adverse effects. The attrition
rate in oncology development is over 90%, often because of
toxicity. Frequently, what is termed failed efficacy is actually a
consequence of lack of tumor specificity for the therapeutic
target. The challenge to the discovery & early development
stage toxicologist is amplified for novel targets in oncology. A
strategy to avoid progressing molecules with chemical structure
based adverse effects while refining the understanding of the
tumor specificity and the PK/PD/toxicity relationships across
species, specific to novel oncology therapeutic candidates, will
be the focus of this presentation.
2:50 Predictive Value of in Vitro
Safety Studies
Willi Suter, Ph.D., Unit Head,
Genetic Toxicology and Safety Pharmacology, SP&A, Novartis Pharma AG
The predictivity of in
vitro methods and their importance for decision-making in drug
development is shown for four important areas of pharmaceutical
safety evaluations, i.e. genetic toxicology, safety pharmacology,
phototoxicity and organ toxicity. A comprehensive analysis of the
predictivity of genetic toxicity tests for rodent carcinogenicity
revealed a major problem with the specificity of the in vitro
mammalian cell assays, which indicates the risk that efficacious
drug candidates might have been dropped because of false positive in
vitro results. Therefore, data from in vitro studies,
including the recently introduced hERG channel inhibition test to
predict QT interval prolongation and from the in vitro 3T3
NRU phototoxicity test to predict phototoxicity should be used
with great care for decision-making. In vitro organ
toxicity models provide important mechanistic information. The
information obtained from in vitro models has significantly
improved the safety of patients in clinical studies, since there
is much more data available early in the development process.
3:20 Plenary Keynote
4:00 Ice Cream Refreshment Break in
the Exhibit Hall with BEST OF SHOW AWARDS
4:45 Strategies for Early Toxicity
Testing with Focus on Genotoxicity Evaluations
Michael J. Schlosser, Ph.D., D.A.B.T.,
President and Founder of Midwest BioResearch (MBR)
There is a wide array of
new screening tools available to toxicologists, but the use of a
particular screen must be decided carefully to optimize the
success of a drug program. Although rapid throughput genetic
toxicity screens that require minimal amounts of compound are
available during lead optimization, their value for predicting
regulatory outcome is dependent on the specific screen chosen.
Screens that mimic the ICH genotoxicity testing battery are best
at predicting IND success and will need to keep pace with possible
changes in ICH guidelines to maintain predictive value.
Regulatory-based genotoxicity screening technologies are also
useful in supporting the safety of metabolites, impurities and
degradation products when only minimal amounts of these materials
are available. Several examples of regulatory-based genotoxicity
screening strategies, including SAR techniques, will be presented.
5:15 Speaker to Be Determined
5:45 End of Day
|