服務導向架構(SOA)基盤建設市場的佔有率、戰略、預測（2008年至2014年）

IBM is the defacto industry standard market leader in SOA. IBM dominates SOA with 64% of the market, the rest of market is divided between 12 other participants with measurable market share, none of whom have even been able to garner as much as 8% of the market. IBM dominates the SOA infrastructure markets with more than half of the market because it has the infrastructure offering that can be used to achieve integration in a heterogeneous IT environment and solid services support to permit the large enterprises to change their business model.

Significant acquisition activity has occurred as all the major computer software and hardware players seek to adjust to the new architectures offered by SOA. Oracle bought BEA, Software AG bought webMethods to mention only a few of the most significant acquisitions.

IBM stands alone as a leader in SOA, inventing the concept of refining reusable solutions that have been around for a long time, adding a unique component and SOA manner, by making the SOA components work to create a worldwide integrated enterprise. While the IBM SOA is able to be used as a solution that works across a global enterprise, the SOA services as implemented in a middleware infrastructure are flexible enough to provide for local variation.

Services oriented architecture (SOA) represents a fundamental change in the way automated process is delivered to replace manual process. Service enabling offerings are a response to the fundamental change in IT, where enterprise competitive advantage is gained from having IT flexibility. Software infrastructure companies have ' service enabled' their offerings in response to demand for the flexibility needed to operate a global enterprise. This service enabling of offerings represents a promise that the software vendor has the ability to build solutions that can be modified and updated in response to changing market conditions.

Enterprise IT departments use SOA to tie together the various assets and get more from the existing investment. To accomplish this, systems integration is needed to create ever changing solutions. Software infrastructure vendors need a strong middleware infrastructure as a fundamental underpinning to creating SOA that works. The ability to create and support service enabled offerings depends on having a strong middleware offering.

Many software companies do not have the basic application integration and messaging core middleware infrastructure needed to run the IT departments efficiently; thus there is a flurry of SOA activity as enterprises companies seek to acquire the right middleware technology that reduces the cost of running the IT department.

Process is sequence. Information is stored in databases, but it is used as process, a sequence of events tied together with calculations and movement of information from one location to another, form one application to another. Process and sequence depend on integration.

SOA depends on transport of messages from one service to another. SOA is a way of implementing services that decouple application logic components and thereby facilitate rearrangement and reuse of software modules or objects. Once the software components have been decoupled, they need to be reconnected using messaging that passes transactions between the SOA components. The IBM mission critical WebSphereMQ is significant because it provides once and only once delivery of transaction messages in a secure manner. This provides the foundation of SOA.

SOA is a way of exposing information from a software module through an API, through an application interface. Once a service has a way of sending information to and from the services, the decoupled components can be re-coupled in different ways. In this manner, the messaging component is significant. There is no longer a single optimized stack, but rather independent components of a stack that may be re-coupled in any order using messaging.

Physical proximity of the components of the stack is no longer a necessity; the components can interact in different ways. Web services have a messaging capability called SOAP. Java has a messaging service called JMS. Both JMS and SOAP typically use IBM MQ messaging wrappers to provide assured delivery of information from one SOA service to another.

SOA engine markets depend on mature infrastructure middleware that provides the ability to consolidate integration modules with foundation architecture. IBM SOA is the software used most often in creating business integration foundation systems. SOA creates a way to organize automated process supporting modules. SOA systems are evolving to support business flexibility by enabling integration of systems dynamically. Applications are being interconnected using integration to create cross-departmental processes. Processes are implemented in real time.

Process is sequence. Information is stored in databases, but it is used as process, process imposes sequence and flow. A sequence of events tied together with calculations and movement of information from one location to another, form an application. The ability to form a SOA collaboration from component repositories and move information from one siloed application to another is implemented as process flow. Process and sequence depend on integration and SOA systems in an engine, evolved to achieve the reuse of existing software code components.

SOA engines and SOA adapters and integration broker components comprise the SOA foundation product. The engine is implemented as a directory or database to control header and use of body information including date, updates, and location of scripts. The components are what are used to implement Web enabled applications. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) market license forecasts relate to growth of the middleware infrastructure. SOA markets at $2 billion in 2007 are expected to reach $9.1 billion by 2014. Growth comes from creating a way to reduce the cost of running an IT department by creating more automated process from software and freeing the budgets for investment in flexible response to changing market conditions.

This is the 353rd report in a series of market research reports that provide forecasts in communications, telecommunications, the internet, computer, software, telephone equipment, health equipment, and energy. The project leaders take direct responsibility for writing and preparing each report. They have significant experience preparing industry studies. Forecasts are based on primary research and proprietary data bases. Forecasts reflect analysis of the market trends in the segment and related segments. Unit and dollar shipments are analyzed through consideration of dollar volume of each market participation in the segment. Installed base analysis and unit analysis is based on interviews and information search. Market share analysis includes conversations with key customers of products, industry segment leaders, marketing directors, distributors, leading market participants, opinion leaders, and companies seeking to develop measurable market share. Over 200 in depth interviews are conducted for each report with a broad range of key participants and industry leaders in the market segment. We establish accurate market forecasts based on economic and market conditions as a base. Use input/output ratios, flow charts, and other economic methods to quantify data. Use in-house analysts who meet stringent quality standards. Interviewing key industry participants, experts and end-users. Our research includes access to large proprietary databases. Literature search includes analysis of trade publications, government reports, and corporate literature.

SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) INFRASTRUCTURE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• IBM Sets Defacto Industry Standard For SOA
  • SOA Industry Consolidation
  • IBM Dominates SOA with 64% of the Market, Rest of Market Divided Between 12 Other Participants With
  • Measurable Market Share
  • SOA As A Mainframe Technology
• Reimbursement to the Line of Business (LoB) for
• Initial SOA Development
• SOA Market Shares
• Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Automates
• Key Business Processes Replacing Manual Process
• SOA Market Forecasts
• SOA Infrastructure Market Driving Forces
  • Building a Robust Data Integration Layer
  • SOA Market Segment
  • SOA Market Driving Forces

1. SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) INFRASTRUCTURE MARKET DESCRIPTION AND MARKET DYNAMICS

• 1.1 Benefits of SOA
  • 1.1.1 SOA Facilitates Integration Beyond The Enterprise Network
• 1.2 SOA Data Integration
  • 1.2.1 Encapsulating Business Logic As Services
  • 1.2.2 Composite Applications
• 1.3 SOA Creates The Agile Business
  • 1.3.1 SOA Return on Investment (ROI)
  • 1.3.2 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Layers
  • 1.3.3 Service-Oriented Architecture Business Benefits
  • 1.3.4 IBM WebSphere Integration Workflow Support
• 1.4 Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
  • 1.4.1 Service-Oriented Architecture IT Benefits
  • 1.4.2 SOA Self-Assessment
  • 1.4.3 Service Infrastructure
  • 1.4.4 Infrastructure Implementations Using SOA Products
  • 1.4.5 SOA Technology Principles
  • 1.4.6 Decoupled Services Value
  • 1.4.7 Security
• 1.5 Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Automates Key Business Processes
  • 1.5.1 SOA Virtual Experience
  • 1.5.2 SOA Building a Channel
  • 1.5.3 SOA Integration Platform
  • 1.5.4 SOA Infrastructure Supports Delivery of Information As A Service
• 1.6 Services Oriented Applications (SOA) Unlock Business Value
  • 1.6.1 Aligning Business Process And Technology
  • 1.6.2 Business Process Challenges
  • 1.6.3 Business Environment
• 1.7 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Ability To Transform Business
  • 1.7.1 Services Oriented Architecture Works By Abstracting Business Processes
  • 1.7.2 Dynamically Building Application Portfolios
  • 1.7.3 Flexible Application Framework
• 1.8 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Workflow
  • 1.8.1 Infrastructure for Services Oriented Architectures Services-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
• 1.9 Web Services Standards
• 1.10 SOA Development Methodology
• 1.11 SOA Creates Transformation Requirements For Document Interchanges
  • 1.11.1 Information Is Mapped From Nodes In A Source Schema To Nodes In The Destination Schema

2. SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) INFRASTRUCTURE MARKET SHARES AND FORECASTS

• 2.1 SOA Infrastructure Market Driving Forces
  • 2.1.1 Building a Robust Data Integration Layer
  • 2.1.2 SOA Market Segment
  • 2.1.3 SOA Market Driving Forces
• 2.2 SOA Market Shares
• 2.3 SOA Market Forecasts
  • 2.3.1 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Core Process 2-10
  • 2.3.2 WebSphereMQ and Tibco Transport Layer Achieve Mission Critical Functionality
  • 2.3.3 SOA Integration Of E-Business
  • 2.3.4 Market Driving Forces For Real Time Exchange of Information
  • 2.3.5 Typical SOA Integration Projects
  • 2.3.6 SOA Business Environment Market Drivers
• 2.4 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Company Market Segment Analysis
  • 2.4.1 SOA Process Component Segments By Vendor
• 2.5 Web Services and Service Oriented Architecture Forecasts
• 2.6 SOA Company Competitive Analysis
  • 2.6.1 Top Competitors IBM, Tibco, Software AG /WebMethods, and Oracle / BEA SOA Platforms
  • 2.6.2 Value of WebSphereMQ, DataPower, and WebSphereMQ Broker to SOA
  • 2.6.3 IBM SOA Model
  • 2.6.4 SOA Components Use IBM WebSphereMQ
  • 2.6.5 IBM WebSphere Application Server Leverages Java Technology as a Stack
  • 2.6.6 IBM SOA Fabric Across The Enterprise To Reuse IT Assets
  • 2.6.7 WebSphere Adapters
  • 2.6.8 Tibco 2-39
  • 2.6.9 Tibco Business Process Management on A SOA Foundation
  • 2.6.10 Software AG
  • 2.6.11 Software AG Solution For SOA Governance
  • 2.6.12 Software AG / webMethods
  • 2.6.13 Microsoft SOA Positioned To Support Building A SOA Application
  • 2.6.14 Oracle / BEA
  • 2.6.15 Sun 2-44
  • 2.6.16 Sybase
• 2.7 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Market Segment Analysis
  • 2.7.1 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Engine Segments Market Forecasts
• 2.8 Competitive Factors Affecting The SOA Market
  • 2.8.1 Services Oriented Architecture Market Trends
  • 2.8.2 System z Significantly Less Expensive than Distributed Computing Environments
  • 2.8.3 Internet Impact
  • 2.8.4 IT Department Need For SOA
  • 2.8.5 SOA Represents The Implementation Of Process From The Desktop
  • 2.8.6 Stack Based vs. Decoupled WebSphereMQ Mission Critical Messaging Approaches to SOA Solutions
  • 2.8.7 Cost, Time And Resources Required To Create And Maintain Integration In A Rapidly Changing Environment 2-60
  • 2.8.8 Application Connectivity Infrastructure Enhances E-Business
• 2.9 Sarbanes-Oxley Solutions Position IT For Flexible Systems
  • 2.9.1 SOA Service Oriented Architecture Markets
  • 2.9.2 E-Business
• 2.10 SOA Regional Analysis
• 2.11 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) For Back End Systems
  • 2.11.1 SOA Industry Segments
  • 2.11.2 Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) For Front End Systems
  • 2.11.3 Customer Service
  • 2.11.4 Partner Business Drivers
  • 2.11.5 Business Process Integration
  • 2.11.6 Integration Of Business Processes
  • 2.11.7 Impact Of Mergers And Acquisitions
  • 2.11.8 Expand Strategic Partnerships
  • 2.11.9 Electronic Commerce
  • 2.11.10 Vendors With A Broad Suite Of Products
  • 2.11.11 Total Segments By Vendor
  • 2.11.12 SOA Integration Broker Segment Market Analysis
• 2.12 Services Oriented Architecture Challenges
• 2.13 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Business Benefits
  • 2.13.1 Network Services

3. SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) ENGINE INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES DESCRIPTION

• 3.1 SOA Business Integration Foundation Systems
• 3.2 IBM SOA Infrastructure
  • 3.2.1 IBM WebSphere SOA Business Integration Foundation
  • 3.2.2 IBM Service Oriented Architecture Smart SOA Continuum
  • 3.2.3 IBM SOA Facilitates Collaboration
  • 3.2.4 IBM SOA Governance Method
  • 3.2.5 IBM SOA Builds Case For Application Modernization
  • 3.2.6 IBM SOA Customers Business Partners / Suppliers
  • 3.2.7 IBM SOA Self-Assessment
  • 3.2.8 IBM SOA Integration Infrastructure
  • 3.2.9 IBM SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
  • IBM WebSphere Business Integration Human Workflow Support
  • 3.2.10 AptSoft
  • 3.2.11 IBM Open Infrastructure
• 3.3 Oracle / BEA SOA
  • 3.3.1 Oracle / BEA / Lab49
  • 3.3.2 Oracle / BEA WebLogic One Million Events Per Second At Microsecond Latencies
  • 3.3.3 Oracle / BEA WebLogic Server Service Component Architecture Supports Next Generation SOA
  • 3.3.4 Oracle / BEA SCA Enable Organizations To Assemble SOA Services
  • 3.3.5 BEA Service-Oriented Architecture for Enterprise Resource Planning Integration
  • 3.3.6 BEA AquaLogic Service Bus Enables Enterprise-Wide SOA Deployments
  • 3.3.7 BEA SOA Service Infrastructure Positioning
  • 3.3.8 BEA SOA Meeting Business Challenges
  • 3.3.9 BEA SOA Application Development
  • 3.3.10 BEA SOA Enterprise Positioning
  • 3.3.11 BEA SOA Enterprise Considerations
  • 3.3.12 BEA SOA for Architects
  • 3.3.13 BEA SOA Self-Assessment
  • 3.3.14 BEA SOA Service Infrastructure
  • 3.3.15 BEA Service Infrastructure
  • 3.3.16 BEA SOA Framework
  • 3.3.17 BEA AquaLogic BPM, Data Services, And Service Bus Platforms
• 3.4 Tibco SOA
  • 3.4.1 Tibco SOA Deployment Managing The Entire Service Lifecycle
  • 3.4.2 Tibco Business Process Management on an SOA Foundation
  • 3.4.3 Tibco SOA Business Process
  • 3.4.4 Tibco SOA Breaks Down Key Applications And Data Into Components
  • 3.4.5 Tibco BPM Reusable Services
  • 3.4.6 Tibco BPM Deployed On SOA
  • 3.4.7 Tibco Business Process Management on A SOA Foundation
  • 3.4.8 Tibco Delivers Full Benefits of BPM on SOA Foundation
  • 3.4.9 Tibco SOA Process Layer And Services Layer, Each Independent Of The Other
  • 3.4.10 Tibco SOA Real-Time Process Monitoring
  • 3.4.11 Tibco Hawk SOA Management Console
  • 3.4.12 TIBCO SOA Governance Best Practices
  • 3.4.13 Tibco SOA ROI
• 3.5 Software AG / WebMethods SOA
  • 3.5.1 Software AG webMethods SOA Suite
  • 3.5.2 Software AG WebMethods CentraSite
  • 3.5.3 Software AG / webMethods Open API and Open Standards
  • 3.5.4 Software AG / webMethods SOA
  • 3.5.5 Software AG / webMethods: X-Broker
  • 3.5.6 Software AG Standards Compliance
  • 3.5.7 Software AG SOA Operations
  • 3.5.8 Software AG SOA Availability Management
  • 3.5.9 Software AG SOA Business Content-Based Routing
  • 3.5.10 Software AG SOA Infrastructure
  • 3.5.11 Software AG Application Composer
• 3.6 Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • 3.6.1 Progress Software Sonic Product Family
  • 3.6.2 ProgressR DataXtend™ Data Integration Software
  • 3.6.3 Progress Software SOA Product Positioning
  • 3.6.4 Progress Software Products
  • 3.6.5 Progress Software Key Transformation Supplier For Operational Intelligence
  • 3.6.6 Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture SOA Products
  • 3.6.7 Progress Software Application Platform Products
  • 3.6.8 Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture for Enterprise Open Consensual Structure
  • 3.6.9 ProgressR Actional SOA Performance Monitoring & Alerting
  • 3.6.10 Progress Software SOA Implementation of Compliance
  • 3.6.11 Progress Software SOA Security
  • 3.6.12 Progress Actional SOA Protects Stored Cardholder Data
  • 3.6.13 Progress Actional SOA Management / Lockheed Martin Defense SOA
  • 3.6.14 Progress Software DataDirect Technologies Product Lines
  • 3.6.15 Progress Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Deployments
  • 3.6.16 Progress Sonic Messaging-Based Enterprise Service Bus ESBR SOA Products
  • 3.6.17 ProgressR Sonic™ Leverages the Sonic ESBR Messaging-Based Enterprise Service Bus
  • 3.6.18 Progress Software Data Infrastructure Products
  • 3.6.19 Sybase SOA Modeling & Metadata
• 3.7 Sun Java Application Platform Suite
  • 3.7.1 Sun Web Services Interoperability SOA Technology (WSIT)
  • 3.7.2 Sun Java Studio Development Tools
• 3.8 Microsoft SOA BizTalk Server SOA Adapter Solution
  • 3.8.1 Microsoft SOA- Underlying Technologies
  • Microsoft Web Services
  • Microsoft BizTalk Server- SOA Implementation
  • Microsoft BizTalk Integration Core Architecture
  • Microsoft BizTalk Capabilities
  • Microsoft BizTalk SOA
  • Microsoft BizTalk Connecting Systems
  • Microsoft BizTalk Adapters For Sending and Receiving Messages
  • Microsoft BizTalk Web Services Adapter
  • Microsoft BizTalk Server Broker for Managing Applications
• 3.9 Raining Data / Tiger Logic
  • 3.9.1 Raining Data TigerLogic FastSOA Architecture
  • 3.9.2 Raining Data TigerLogic FastSOA Architecture
• 3.10 Vitria Business Accelerator
  • 3.10.1 Vitria Resolution Accelerator
  • 3.10.2 Vitria Resolution Accelerator Return on Investment
  • 3.10.3 Vitria Solution
  • 3.10.4 Vitria Pricing & Availability
  • 3.10.5 Vitria Business Accelerator and BusinessWare™
• 3.11 Iona Artix Registry/Repository
  • 3.11.1 Iona Artix Suite Provisioning And Managing SOA Implementations
  • 3.11.2 Iona Leadership In Supporting SOA Best Practices And Industry Standards
  • 3.11.3 IONA Artix
• 3.12 Cape Clear
• 3.13 Hewlett Packard
  • 3.13.1 HP SOA Positioning
  • 3.13.2 HP SOA Center
  • 3.13.3 HP SOA Center Functions
  • 3.13.4 HP SOA Systinet Software Functions
  • 3.13.5 HP SOA Systinet Provides Governance For Accelerating Adoption And Mitigating The Risk Of SOA
• 3.14 Fiorano 168
  • 3.14.1 Fiorano ESB
  • 3.14.2 Fiorano Software SOA Integration Backbone Solutions
  • 3.14.3 Fiorano SOA Platform
  • 3.14.4 Fiorano SOA Platform Components
• 3.15 Monitoring SOA
• 3.16 MQ Software Qnami
• 3.17 Tidal Intersperse Management and Analysis of SOA Applications
  • 3.17.1 Tidal Intersperse Proactively Pinpoints Performance In The Context Of Business Process
  • 3.17.2 Tidal Intersperse Solutions Utilize Standard JMX
• 3.18 Skyway SOA Visual Workspace Models Used to Build SOA Code
  • 3.18.1 Skyway SOA Model Driven Interactive Services Delivery
  • 3.18.2 Skyway Separates The Business Logic From The Solutions Code Modules
• 3.19 Progress Software Actional SOA Management
• 3.20 Mindreef SOA Testing Tool

4. SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) TECHNOLOGY

• 4.1 SOA Infrastructure Technology
  • 4.1.1 Building a Robust Data Integration Layer
  • 4.1.2 Microsoft Internet Explorer RSS Functionality
  • 4.1.3 SOA Data Integration Layer Supports Developer Access To Metadata To Build Services
• 4.2 State Machine
  • 4.2.1 Bluenote
  • 4.2.2 SOA Network Strategy
  • 4.2.3 SOA Representational State Transfer Is A Mode Of Communication Accessible To Programs And Humans
• 4.3 XDMS Technology
  • 4.3.1 Web Services and Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Tier Architecture 4-13
  • 4.3.2 Raining Data TigerLogic FastSOA Architecture
• 4.4 Tibco SOA Products
  • 4.4.1 Tibco Enterprise Backbone Software
  • 4.4.2 Tibco Process Collaboration Suite
• 4.5 webMethods SOA Fabric Broker
  • webMethods SOA
  • webMethods Guided SOA Solution
• 4.6 SOA Dynamic Architecture
  • 4.6.1 Google Search Engine Dynamic Architecture
  • 4.6.2 BigFiles
  • 4.6.3 Repository
  • 4.6.4 Microsoft .Net Defines Reusable Modules Dynamically
  • 4.6.5 Microsoft Combines Managed Modules into Assemblies
  • 4.6.6 Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
  • 4.6.7 IBM SOA Architecture is Dynamic for the Transport Layer
• 4.7 Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
  • 4.7.1 SOA Technology Issues
  • 4.7.2 Technology Platforms
  • 4.7.3 Existing Enterprise Asset Automated Virtualization
  • 4.7.4 Complexity Of The Underlying IT Technologies
  • 4.7.5 Impact of Platforms
  • 4.7.6 Platforms and Disparate Technologies
• 4.8 Services Oriented Applications (SOA) Services
  • 4.8.1 Application Integration Professional Services
    • Implementation Strategies
  • 4.8.2 Application Connectivity
  • 4.8.3 Single Vendor Issues
  • 4.8.4 Standards Adoption
  • 4.8.5 SOA Technology Analysis
• 4.9 SOA Business Benefits
• 4.10 Business Events
  • 4.10.1 Event Transmission
  • 4.10.2 Business Process Automation
• 4.11 Process Oriented Architecture
  • 4.11.1 Business Process Automation
  • 4.11.2 Business Process Management Modular Architecture
  • 4.11.3 Business Components
• 4.12 Advanced E-Business Infrastructure
  • 4.12.1 Application Integration Technical Advantages
  • 4.12.2 Integration System Architecture
• 4.13 Open Systems
  • 4.13.1 Adapters
• 4.14 Development Toolset
  • 4.14.1 Infrastructure And System Management
• 4.15 BPM Software Process Design
  • 4.15.1 Process Monitoring
  • 4.15.2 Messaging as Part of Process Operation
• 4.16 BPM / Web Services
  • 4.16.1 Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA)
  • 4.16.2 Enterprise Application Servers
  • 4.16.3 Advantages Of Java In Context Of Application Integration
  • 4.16.4 EAI Technology Heritage
• 4.17 Web Services
  • 4.17.1 Promise Of Web Services
  • 4.17.2 Microsoft .Net Framework
  • 4.17.3 Java 4-77
  • 4.17.4 Java Technology
  • 4.17.5 J2EE 4-79
  • 4.17.6 Soap 4-79
  • 4.17.7 Apache Soap
  • 4.17.8 Load Balancer With SSL Support
  • 4.17.9 Points Of Failure
  • 4.17.10 Soap Limitations
  • 4.17.11 WSDL 4-85
  • 4.17.12 WSDL Service Descriptions
  • 4.17.13 UDDI 4-87
  • 4.17.14 UDDI Test Registries
  • 4.17.15 UDDI Distributed Web Service Discovery
  • 4.17.16 UDDI Consortium
  • 4.17.17 WS-Inspection Document Extensibility
  • 4.17.18 XML 4-91
  • 4.17.19 XSLT 4-92
  • 4.17.20 Metadata Repository
  • 4.17.21 Metadata Describes Location, Format, Relationships, Transformation, Rules, Cross-Reference
  • 4.17.22 Metadata Drives Creation Of Data Integration Services
  • 4.17.23 Wrappering
  • 4.17.24 Workflow Management Coalition
• 4.18 Service Level Challenges
  • 4.18.1 Quality Of Service (QoS) Functions
  • 4.18.2 Network Efficiency
• 4.19 Business Need
  • 4.19.1 Business Process Management Packaged Solutions for Rapid Deployment 4-100
  • 4.19.2 Quality Of Service Control
• 4.20 BPMI.org
  • 4.20.1 Bpmi.Org Defines Open Specifications
  • 4.20.2 BPM Transactional Finite-State Machines
  • 4.20.3 BPQL 4-105
  • 4.20.4 XML Standards
• 4.21 Oasis 4-108
• 4.22 Services Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • 4.22.1 IBM Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • 4.22.2 SOA Business Challenge IT Imperative
  • 4.22.3 Services Oriented Architecture And Relevant Standards
  • 4.22.4 XML 4-113
  • 4.22.5 Integration Engines Leverage XML Processing
  • 4.22.6 XML Standards
  • 4.22.7 XML Role In Application Topology
  • 4.22.8 XML Meets The Integration Challenge
  • 4.22.9 XML Standard Communication Language
  • 4.22.10 Web Services Protocols
  • 4.22.11 Web Services Input And Output Formats
  • 4.22.12 Web Services Coupling Versus Cohesion
  • 4.22.13 Web Services Coupling
  • 4.22.14 Web Services Cohesion
• 4.23 Open Systems
• 4.24 Java 4-126
  • 4.24.1 AI Vendor Commitment To Java
  • 4.24.2 Advantages Of Java In Context Of Application Integration
• 4.25 Web Services
• 4.26 WS-Transaction and BPEL4WS specifications
  • 4.26.1 WS-Reliable Messaging
  • 4.26.2 WS-Addressing
  • 4.26.3 Architecture for Reliable Messaging Delivery
• 4.27 Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI)
• 4.28 UDDI Registry
  • 4.28.1 UDDI Test Registries
  • 4.28.2 UDDI Distributed Web Service Discovery
  • 4.28.3 UDDI Consortium
  • 4.28.4 SOAP 4-136
  • 4.28.5 SOAP Framework
  • 4.28.6 SOAP Framework For Developing Web Services
  • 4.28.7 Apache SOAP
  • 4.28.8 Load balancer with SSL support
  • 4.28.9 Points Of Failure
  • 4.28.10 SOAP Limitations
  • 4.28.11 SOAP Protocol Uses Multi-Step Process
  • 4.28.12 Framework Benefits
  • 4.28.13 SOAP Test Strategies
  • 4.28.14 SOAP Solutions
• 4.29 WSDL 4-143
  • 4.29.1 WSDL Service Descriptions
  • 4.29.2 WS-Inspection Document Extensibility
• 4.30 Language XSLT
• 4.31 ebXML 4-146
  • 4.31.1 ebXML and Open Applications Group OAGIS Standards
  • 4.31.2 EBXML Standard
• 4.32 IP Addressing / Directory Management
  • 4.32.1 Web Services Security Specification
  • 4.32.2 Components for Secure Web Services
• 4.33 Web Services Reliability Specification
  • 4.33.1 B2B Commerce Technology As A Working Reality
  • 4.33.2 Application Server Strategy
  • 4.33.3 Communities Of Partners
  • 4.33.4 Common Development Environment Across Windows And Linux 4-158
• 4.34 Web Services Technology
  • 4.34.1 Java Application Server
  • 4.34.2 Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs)
  • 4.34.3 Autonomic Computing Technologies
  • 4.34.4 Grid Protocol Topology
  • 4.34.5 Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA)
  • 4.34.6 Eclipse Open-Source Tools Framework
  • 4.34.7 Difficulties of Corba
  • 4.34.8 Distributed Object Computing Model
  • 4.34.9 Asynchronous Communications
• 4.35 Stateless Session Bean
• 4.36 Cluster 4-177
• 4.37 Location Transparency
• 4.38 Smart Proxy
• 4.39 Load Balancing
• 4.40 Process-Entity Design Pattern
• 4.41 Command Objects / Control Flow
• 4.42 Authorization Checks
• 4.43 Delegation
• 4.44 Collaborative Filtering
• 4.45 Site Analysis
• 4.46 Portals 4-185
  • 4.46.1 Real-Time Processing

5. SERVICES ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE SOA INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY PROFILES

• 5.1 SOA Market Consolidation
• 5.2 Accenture
• 5.3 Aldon
• 5.4 Cape Clear Software
• 5.5 DataDirect Technologies
• 5.6 DataFlux Corporation
• 5.7 DataSynapse
  • 5.7.1 DataSynapse Revenue Growth In 2007
  • 5.7.2 DataSynapse Products
  • 5.7.3 DataSynapse Enabling Real-Time Infrastructures
  • 5.7.4 DataSynapse / Informatica Partnership
  • 5.7.5 DataSynapse FabricServer™ Real-Time Infrastructure Software
  • 5.7.6 DataSynapse Platform Supports SOA Applications
• 5.8 Eclipse Foundation
  • 5.8.1 Skyway Software Joins Eclipse Foundation
• 5.9 Exaltec Software
• 5.10 Exeros
• 5.11 Extol International
• 5.12 Francisco Partners / GXS
• 5.13 GigaSpaces Technologies
• 5.14 HCL Technologies Ltd.
  • 5.14.1 HCL Technologies second quarter revenue FY 2OO7-08
  • 5.14.2 HCL Technologies Strategy
• 5.15 Hewlett-Packard
  • 5.15.1 Hewlett Packard Service-Oriented Architecture
  • 5.15.2 HP SOA Center Components
  • 5.15.3 HP Financial Information 2008
  • 5.15.4 HP Personal Systems Group
  • 5.15.5 HP Imaging and Printing Group
  • 5.15.6 HP Enterprise Storage and Servers
  • 5.15.7 HP Services
  • 5.15.8 HP Software
  • 5.15.9 HP Financial Services
  • 5.15.10 HP Technology Positioning
• 5.16 IBM
  • 5.16.1 IBM SOA Infrastructure
  • 5.16.2 IBM WebSphere SOA Business Integration Foundation
  • 5.16.3 IBM 2008 Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Revenue
• 5.17 IDS Scheer
• 5.18 Informatica
• 5.19 Information Builders
  • 5.19.1 Information Builders / iWay Software
• 5.20 Iona Technologies
  • 5.20.1 Iona High-Performance Integration Solutions
  • 5.20.2 Iona / LogicBlaze and C24: Open-Source SOA Company
  • 5.20.3 Iona Revenue For Full Year And Fourth Quarter 2007
  • 5.20.4 IONA Providing Distributed, Standards-Based Solutions To IT Organizations
  • 5.20.5 IONA Revenue
  • 5.20.6 IONA Customers
  • 5.20.7 IONA Revenue
  • 5.20.8 IONAR Technologies Distributed Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Infrastructure Governance Solutions
• 5.21 Jacada
• 5.22 Nexaweb Technologies, Inc.
  • 5.22.1 Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 and SOA With HP Governance
  • 5.22.2 Nexaweb SOA Application and SOA Governance
  • 5.22.3 Nexaweb Web2SOA™ Ecosystem Program
• 5.23 Oracle / BEA
  • 5.23.1 Oracle / BEA Systems
  • 5.23.2 BEA / Sony Pictures Entertainment / Tata Consultancy: Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • 5.23.3 Oracle and BEA Customers and Partners
  • 5.23.4 Oracle BEA Systems / Skyway Software Service Delivery and SOA Governance Partnership
  • 5.23.5 Oracle / BEA Revenue
  • 5.23.6 BEA Customers and Partnerships
  • 5.23.7 BEA Revenues
• 5.24 Pervasive Software
• 5.25 PolarLake
• 5.26 Progress Software
  • 5.26.1 Progress Software Market Presence
  • 5.26.2 Progress Software Strategy
  • 5.26.3 Progress Software Go To Market Strategy
  • 5.26.4 Progress Software Revenue 2007
  • 5.26.5 Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Products
  • 5.26.6 Progress Software Application Platform Products
  • 5.26.7 Progress Software DataDirect Technologies Strategy and Positioning
  • 5.26.8 Progress Software Powers Innovation
  • 5.26.9 Progress Software Data Infrastructure Products
• 5.27 Raining Data
  • 5.27.1 Raining Data Supports Key Technical Specifications
  • 5.27.2 Raining Data Business Partners
• 5.28 Rogue Wave
  • 5.28.1 Rogue Wave SourcePro C++
  • 5.28.2 Rogue Wave Software / IBM Model for C++
• 5.29 SAP
  • 5.29.1 SAP AG Revenue For The Fourth Quarter And Full Year Ended December 31, 2007
  • 5.29.2 SAP / Business Objects
  • 5.29.3 SAP Fourth Quarter 2007 Revenues
  • 5.29.4 SAP Key Events - Fourth Quarter 2007
  • 5.29.5 IBM and SAP Joint Software Product
• 5.30 Serena Software
  • 5.30.1 Serena Software Go-To-Market Strategy: Web 2.0, SOA, and SaaS
  • 5.30.2 Serena Business Mashups
  • 5.30.3 Serena Software Business Mashup
  • 5.30.4 No Fuss, No Muss Mashups
• 5.31 Shunra
• 5.32 Silver Creek Systems
• 5.33 Siperian
• 5.34 Skyway Software
  • 5.34.1 Skyway Software Focused On Building A J2EE Application Development
  • 5.34.2 Skyway Software Technology And Processes To IT Organizations
  • 5.34.3 Skyway Software
• 5.35 SoftwareAG / WebMethods
  • 5.35.1 Software AG / webMethods Acquisition
  • 5.35.2 SoftwareAG Crossvision Business Renamed webMethods
  • 5.35.3 Software AG Revenue
  • 5.35.4 Software AG SOA Value Assessment
  • 5.35.5 Software AG Revenue 2007
  • 5.35.6 Software AG Partner Program
• 5.36 Software AG / webMethods
  • 5.36.1 Software AG / webMethods Revenue
• 5.37 Symphoniq
• 5.38 Tata Consultancy Services
• 5.39 TBA Group / B2br:
• 5.40 TechTarget
• 5.41 Tibco Software
  • 5.41.1 Tibco Revenue
  • 5.41.2 Tibco Revenue:
  • 5.41.3 Tibco Fourth Quarter Revenue Fiscal 2007
  • 5.41.4 Tibco Customers
• 5.42 Tidal Software
  • 5.42.1 Tidal Customers
• 5.43 Torry Harris
• 5.44 Vitria
  • 5.44.1 Vitria Business Process Integration Products and Solutions
  • 5.44.2 Resolution Accelerator
  • 5.44.3 Vitria ROI Return on Investment
  • 5.44.4 Vitria Pricing & Availability
  • 5.44.5 Vitria Business Process Integration Products
  • 5.44.6 Vitria Partners
  • 5.44.7 Vitria Customers
  • 5.44.8 Vitria SOA Positioning
  • 5.44.9 Vitria Technology Business Accelerator
  • 5.44.10 Vitria Technology Business Process Integration Products And Solutions
  • 5.44.11 Vitria Customer Base
  • 5.44.12 Vitria / B2Br Partnership
• 5.45 Wipro Technologies
• 5.46 Other SOA Centric Companies

• Table ES-1
• SOA Market Shares, 2007
• Table ES-2
• SOA Value of Automated Process
• Table ES-3
• SOA Market Forecasts, 2008-2014
• Table ES-4
• Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Benefits
• Table ES-5
• Services Oriented Architecture SOA Market Driving Forces

• Table 1-1
• Using SOA To Facilitate Integration Beyond The Enterprise Network
• Table 1-2
• SOA Agile Business Functions
• Table 1-3
• SOA Agile Business Benefits
• Table 1-4
• Key SOA Data and Metadata Components
• Table 1-5
• SOA Return on Investment (ROI)
• Table 1-6
• Process Of SOA Implementation Depends On N-Dimensional
• Interaction Of Layers That Can Be Modeled by Business Analyst
• Table 1-7
• IBM SOA Business I Services Layers
• Figure 1-8
• IBM Smart SOA Continuum
• Table 1-9
• SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
• Table 1-10
• Business Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
• Table 1-11
• IT Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
• Table 1-12
• Dramatic Increase in Business Activity Speed Drives SOA
• Table 1-13
• Business Aspects of Change Response Creating Need for SOA
• Table 1-14
• SOA Engine Manages Information Access To Create A Service
• Table 1-15
• Services Oriented Architecture Achieves Flexible Infrastructure
• Table 1-16
• Services Oriented Architecture Line Of Business Positioning
• Table 1-17
• Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Efficiency
• Table 1-18
• Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Challenges
• Table 1-19
• Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Risk Management
• Table 1-20
• Services Oriented Architecture Business Process Improvements

• Table 2-1
• Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Benefits
• Table 2-2
• Services Oriented Architecture SOA Market Driving Forces
• Table 2-3
• SOA Market Shares, 2007
• Table 2-4
• SOA Market Shares, 2007
• Table 2-5
• SOA Market Forecasts, 2008-2014
• Table 2-6
• SOA Market Driving Forces For Real Time Computing
• Table 2-7
• Typical SOA Integration Projects
• Table 2-8
• Services Oriented Architecture Market Segments By Company, Dollars, 2006
• Table 2-9
• Services Oriented Architecture Market Segments By Company, Percent, 2006
• Figure 2-10
• Services Oriented Architecture Vendor Market Segment Participation, 2006
• Table 2-11
• Worldwide EAI Application Integration Engine and Component Market Forecasts, 2007-2013
• Table 2-12
• Worldwide Services Oriented ArchitectureMarket Segments, 2007-2013
• Table 2-13
• Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture Market Segments, 2007
• Table 2-14
• Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Engine Web Services Segment Market Forecasts,
• Dollars, 2007-2013
• Table 2-15
• Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Engine Web Services Segment Market Forecasts,
• Percent, 2007-2013
• Table 2-16
• Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Component Market Forecasts, Dollars, 2007-2013
• Table 2-17
• SOA Competitive Market Factors
• Table 2-18
• Network Business Integration (BI)
• Table 2-19
• Internet Impact On SOA
• Table 2-20
• Impact of Application Connectivity On E-Business
• Table 2-21
• Sarbanes-Oxley Solutions Position IT For Flexible Systems
• Table 2-22
• Sarbanes-Oxley Functions Required
• Table 2-23
• Sarbanes-Oxley Features
• Table 2-24
• SOA Business Environment Market Drivers
• Figure 2-25
• Worldwide Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Regional
• Market Shares, 2007
• Table 2-26
• Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Regional Market Shares, 2007
• Figure 2-27
• Services Oriented Architecture (SOA)
• Regional Market Shares In Europe, 2007
• Table 2-28
• Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) European
• Regional Market Shares, 2007
• Table 2-29
• Business Benefits Of SOA
• Table 2-30
• Enterprise Back End System Advantages From SOA
• Table 2-31
• Enterprise Market Advantages From SOA
• Table 2-32
• Integration Targeted To B2B And Exchanges
• Table 2-33
• Business Process Integration Advantages
• Table 2-34
• Enterprise Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) Processes
• Table 2-35
• E-Business Objectives
• Table 2-36
• Electronic Commerce Infrastructure Requirements
• Table 2-37
• SOA Functions Enable E-commerce
• Table 2-38
• SOA Support For Internet Commerce And EDI
• Table 2-39
• Key Challenges Of Application Integration
• Table 2-40
• Integration Modular Architecture Impact

• Table 3-1
• SOA Leveraging of Business Integration Systems
• Table 3-2
• SOA Engine Segments
• Table 3-3
• IBM WebSphere SOA Business Integration Server Functions
• Table 3-4
• IBM WebSphere Business Integration Foundation Server Visual Functions
• Figure 3-5
• IBM Smart SOA Continuum
• Table 3-6
• IBM SOA Business Integration Functions
• Figure 3-7
• IBM SOA Risks Managed By Governance
• Figure 3-8
• IBM SOA Governance Method
• Table 3-9
• IBM SOA Implements Application Modernization
• Table 3-10
• IBM SOA Transaction Systems Support
• Table 3-11
• IBM SOA Business Innovation & Optimization Services
• Table 3-12
• IBM SOA Services Atomic And Composite Architecture
• Table 3-13
• SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
• Table 3-14
• Core Components Of BEA-Lab49 Framework
• Table 3-15
• BEA Workshop SCA Component Tooling Functions
• Table 3-16
• BEA SmartConnect, BEA AquaLogic Service Bus Functions
• Table 3-17
• BEA AquaLogic Enterprise Agility Benefits
• Table 3-18
• BEA SOA Organizes Enterprise IT around Services Instead Of Applications
• Table 3-19
• Business Challenges Addressed by BEA SOA
• Table 3-20
• BEA SOA Application Development Benefits
• Table 3-21
• BEA Service-Driven Approach Experience Business and IT Benefits
• Table 3-22
• BEA IT Benefits of Service-Oriented Architecture
• Table 3-23
• BEA SOA Enterprise Considerations
• Figure 3-24
• BEA SOA Business Enabled Strategies
• Table 3-25
• BEA Key SOA Findings
• Table 3-26
• BEA Key SOA Business Drivers
• Table 3-27
• BEA Key SOA IT Drivers
• Table 3-28
• BEA SOA Service Infrastructure
• Table 3-29
• BEA Perception of IT Business Challenges Driving SOA
• Table 3-30
• BEA SOA Business Challenge
• Table 3-31
• Tibco SOA Fundamentals
• Table 3-32
• Tibco SOA Process Layer And Services Layer Functions
• Table 3-33
• Tibco SOA Process Layer And Services Layer Benefits
• Figure 3-34
• Tibco SOA Business Value ROI
• Figure 3-35
• Tibco SOA Implementation ROI
• Table 3-36
• Software AG SOA Methodology
• Table 3-37
• Software AG WebMethods SOA Positioning
• Table 3-38
• Types of Software AG webMethods SOA Assets
• Table 3-39
• Software AG CentraSite Means to Achieve Business Results Using SOA
• Table 3-40
• Software AG webMethods X-Broker SOA Security Functions
• Table 3-41
• Progress Software Product Positioning
• Table 3-42
• Progress Software Products
• Table 3-43
• Progress Software SOA Platforms Supported
• Table 3-44
• Progress Software SOA Technologies Benefits
• Table 3-45
• Progress Software SOA Positioning
• Table 3-46
• Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Products
• Table 3-47
• Progress Software Application Platform Products
• Table 3-48
• ProgressR Actional SOA Performance Monitoring & Alerting Functions
• Table 3-49
• Progress Software DataDirect Technologies Product Lines
• Table 3-50
• Progress Software Services Infrastructure Functions
• Table 3-51
• Progress Software Products
• Table 3-52
• ProgressR DataXtend and DataDirect Technologies Product Functions
• Table 3-53
• Progress Software DataDirect Technologies Positioning
• Figure 3-54
• Sybase SOA Modeling & Metadata Layers
• Table 3-55
• Sun Web Services Interoperability SOA Technology (WSIT) Functions
• Table 3-56
• Sun Java Studio Development Tools Benefits
• Table 3-57
• Microsoft Fundamental Principles Of SOA
• Table 3-58
• Microsoft SOA Benefits
• Table 3-59
• Microsoft BizTalk functions
• Table 3-60
• Microsoft BizTalk Core Benefits
• Table 3-61
• Microsoft BizTalk SOA Orchestrations
• Table 3-62
• Microsoft BizTalk SOA Technology
• Table 3-63
• Microsoft BizTalk Web Services Adapters
• Table 3-64
• Microsoft BizTalk Web Services Adapters For Commonly-Used Business Software
• Table 3-65
• Microsoft BizTalk Server Broker for Managing Applications
• Table 3-66
• TigerLogic FastSOA SOA / Web Services Architecture
• Table 3-67
• Raining Data TigerLogic FastSOA Benefits
• Table 3-68
• Vitria Business Accelerator Functions
• Table 3-69
• Iona Artix Suite Functions
• Table 3-70
• Iona Artix Suite SOA Interoperability Functions
• Figure 3-71
• Cape Clear ESB platform
• Table 3-72
• HP SOA Positioning Inside the Company
• Figure 3-73
• Hewlett Packard SOA Positioning
• Table 3-74
• HP SOA Center Essential Elements
• Table 3-75
• HP Systinet SOA Software Key Capabilities
• Table 3-76
• HP SOA Center Key Approach to SOA
• Table 3-77
• HP SOA Center Component Functions
• Table 3-78
• HP SOA Systinet Software Functions
• Table 3-79
• HP Business Technology Optimization (BTO) Strategy Aspects
• Table 3-80
• HP Business Technology Optimization (BTO) Strategy Key Challenges
• Table 3-81
• HP Business Technology Optimization (BTO) SOA System Of Record Capabilities
• Table 3-82
• HP SOA Business Technology Strategy Key Benefits
• Table 3-83
• Tidal Software Modules
• Table 3-84
• Progress Software Actional SOA Management Features

• Table 4-1
• SOA Metadata Comprises Data Integration Layer
• Table 4-2
• SOA Metadata Data Integration Layer Functions
• Table 4-3
• Raining Data TigerLogic XDMS Architecture
• Table 4-4
• Web Services and SOA Tier Architecture
• Figure 4-5
• Raining Data TigerLogic XDMS Multi-Schema Engine Architecture
• Figure 4-6
• Raining Data TigerLogic XDMS -SOA Engine Architecture
• Table 4-7
• SoftwareAG / webMethods Fabric SOA Benefits
• Table 4-8
• SoftwareAG / webMethods Fabric SOA Collaborations Components
• Table 4-9
• Key Benefits of SoftwareAG / webMethods Infravio -
• Registry, Repository, and Governance
• Table 4-10
• WebMethods SOA Registry Engine
• Table 4-11
• Google Dynamic Architecture
• Figure 4-12
• Microsoft .Net Dynamic Definition of Reusable Modules
• Figure 4-13
• Microsoft .NET Compiling Source Code into Managed Assemblies
• Figure 4-14
• Microsoft Architecture Dynamic Modular Processing
• Table 4-15
• Process Of SOA Implementation Depends On N-Dimensional
• Interaction Of Layers That Can Be Modeled by Business Analyst
• Table 4-16
• IBM SOA Business I Services Layers
• Figure 4-17
• IBM Smart SOA Continuum
• Table 4-18
• SOA Foundation Reference Architecture
• Table 4-19
• Type Of Event Information
• Table 4-20
• Event Management Definition
• Table 4-21
• Integration Services
• Table 4-22
• Business Components Chained Together To Comprise A
• Business Service
• Table 4-23
• Integration Services
• Table 4-24
• Design Concerns For Integration System Architecture
• Table 4-25
• Soap-Based Web Service Production Environment Testing
• Table 4-26
• XSLT Transformation Of XML
• Table 4-27
• Metadata Repository
• Table 4-28
• SOA Metadata Functions
• Table 4-28
• BPML E-Business Processes
• Table 4-29
• Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Functions
• Table 4-30
• Integration Engine XML Processing Functions That Drive
• Business Process Electronically End-To-End
• Electronically End-To-End
• Table 4-31
• Web Services Input Formats
• Table 4-32
• Web Services Output Formats
• Table 4-33
• Web Services Protocols
• Table 4-34
• Companies Driving Web Services
• WS-Transaction and BPEL4WS
• Table 4-35
• SOAP-Based Web Service Production Environment Testing
• Table 4-36
• XSLT Transformation of XML
• Table 4-37
• Functions Of An IP Addressing Device
• Table 4-38
• Benefits Of an IP Addressing Device
• Table 4-40
• Companies Driving Web Services Reliability Specification
• Table 4-41
• Aspects Of Application Server Technology
• Table 4-42
• Mainstream Application Servers Strategic Positioning
• Table 4-43
• Application Server Underlying Infrastructure Services
• Table 4-44
• Major Types Of Enterprise Beans
• Table 4-45
• Autonomic Features
• Table 4-46
• Autonomic Functions
• Table 4-47
• Distributed Transaction Functions
• Table 4-48
• Portal Functions
• Table 4-49
• B2B Application Server Quantifiable Business Benefit
• Table 4-50
• Trading Exchange Positioning
• Table 4-51
• Integrated e-Market Benefits

• Table 5-1
• SOA Acquisition Activity
• Figure 5-2
• Cape Clear ESB Platform
• Table 5-3
• DataSynapse Market Positioning
• Table 5-4
• DataSynapse Products
• Table 5-5
• DataSynapse / Informatica Partnership Solutions Benefits
• Table 5-6
• DataSynapse FabricServer™ Real-Time Infrastructure business goals
• Table 5-7
• DataSynapse FabricServer Data Center Benefits
• Table 5-8
• DataSynapse FabricServer Key Features
• Table 5-9
• HP Systinet SOA Center Components Key Capabilities
• Table 5-10
• Iona Activity Summary
• Table 5-11
• Nexaweb Enterprise Web Suite Features
• Table 5-12
• Nexaweb Enterprise Web Suite Functions
• Table 5-13
• Oracle and BEA Customer Benefits
• Figure 5-14
• Progress Software Revenue 2007
• Figure 5-15
• Progress Software SOA Revenue 2007
• Table 5-16
• Progress Software Corporation
• Table 5-17
• Progress Software 2007 Enterprise Revenue %
• Figure 5-18
• Progress Software Revenue
• Table 5-19
• Progress Software Services Oriented Architecture Products
• Table 5-20
• Progress Software Application Platform Products
• Table 5-21
• Progress Software Data Infrastructure Products
• Table 5-22
• Serena Pre-Built Business Mashup Functions
• Table 5-23
• Serena' s PPM Solution Functions
• Table 5-24
• SoftwareAG Crossvision and webMethods Functions
• Table 5-25
• Software AG Positioning
• Table 5-26
• Selected Software AG Customers In Key Industries
• Table 5-27
• Selected Software AG Technologies Offered
• Table 5-28
• Selected Software AG Product Line
• Figure 5-29
• Software AG and webMethods Revenue, 2006
• Figure 5-30
• Software AG and webMethods Revenue By Business Line, 2006
• Figure 5-31
• Sofware AG Revenue by Segment, 2007
• Table 5-32
• Software AG Revenue 2007
• Table 5-33
• Vitria SOA Positioning
• Table 5-34
• Selected Other SOA Centric Companies And Organizations