IPTV、IMS及多重服務整合市場

IPTV Operators are facing dramatically new challenges for them to create services and features that are relevant to a new generation of consumers, who crave to be in constant contact and share all manner of content over broadband networks to multiple devices.

Over 180 Operators and vendors and IPTV Operators profiled or described in this epic report on how converged services will emerge over the next 5-1O years. Tracking the IMS, SDP and NGN plans of the big and the small Operators and vendors, this report smoothes the path for Operators & IPTV vendors to map future CapEx events in the next five years of a highly competitive market.

The IPTV, IMS and the Emergence of Multi-Service Convergence report details the needs, features, use-cases, emerging standards, evolving Service Delivery Platforms and technology suppliers that will help Operators deliver these services as a unified, converged whole; and it makes recommendations as to how Operators may address these new service challenges.

1. Executive Summary

• 1.1 The Dilemma of Convergence
• 1.2 The Variety of Needs Driving Convergence
• 1.3 Features of Convergence
• 1.4 The Impact of Convergence
• 1.5 Revenue View of Convergence
• 1.6 Potentials for Increased Revenue Due to Convergence
• 1.7 Reality Check: Increased Revenue Due to Convergence
• 1.8 OpEx View of Convergence
• 1.9 Technology and Platform View of Convergence
• 1.10 Content View of Convergence
• 1.11 Siloization Happens
  • 1.11.1 New Silos Force Change in Boundaries
  • 1.11.2 Foundations for Silo-Busting
  • 1.11.3 Siloization Caveats
• 1.12 Operator Readiness to Provide Advanced Services

2. What is Convergence?

• 2.1 Definition
  • 2.1.1 What Does Convergence Require?
  • 2.1.2 Convergence as a Work in Progress
  • 2.1.3 Converged Use-Cases
• 2.2 Purpose: Why Operators Care About Convergence
• 2.3 What Convergence is Not

3. Overview of Converged Services, Features and Service Models

• 3.1 Evolution of Services and Platforms from Siloed to Converged
  • 3.1.1 Basic IPTV Capabilities
  • 3.1.2 Intermediate IPTV Capabilities
  • 3.1.3 Advanced IPTV Capabilities
  • 3.1.4 Personalization
  • 3.1.5 Socialization
• 3.2 Evolution of Consumer Devices from Siloed to Converged
• 3.3 Silo-Busting: Convergence Finally Arrives
  • 3.3.1 Converged IPTV Capabilities
  • 3.3.2 Use of Video and TV on Non-TV Devices
• 3.4 Use-Cases, Usability and Human Factors Engineering
  • 3.4.1 The Concept of Use-Cases
  • 3.4.2 Usability
  • 3.4.3 Human Factors Engineering
• 3.5 Silo-Busting Convergence Features and Use-Cases
  • 3.5.1 Convergence Features Involving Personal Communications
  • 3.5.2 Converged Time-, Place- and Device-Shifting Features
  • 3.5.3 Content-Shifting
  • 3.5.4 Socially-Enabled Converged Features
  • 3.5.5 Location-Based Converged Services
  • 3.5.6 Video and Targeted Advertising
  • 3.5.7 Commerce-Enabled Convergence
• 3.6 Content and Convergence
  • 3.6.1 Content From the Internet to the TV and Other Non-PC Devices
  • 3.6.2 Content as a Service
  • 3.6.3 User-Generated Content (UGC)
  • 3.6.4 “Search” and “Found”
  • 3.6.5 Content Sharing
• 3.7 Converged Functionality that Extends User-Wide
  • 3.7.1 Common Identity Management: Subscriber' s View
  • 3.7.2 Common Identity Management: Systems View
  • 3.7.3 Multi-output Video Encoding and Distribution to Multiple Devices
  • 3.7.4 Common Content Protection
• 3.8 Convergence and Advertising
  • 3.8.1 Extending Transactional Revenue Across Services
  • 3.8.2 Convergence Necessitates New Advertising Models
  • 3.8.3 Other Thoughts on Monetizing Content in a Converged Service

4. Exploiting SDPs, IMS and Other Enabling Technologies

• 4.1 Evolution From Single-Service Silos to Multi-Service Convergence
• 4.2 Controlling the Integration Dilemma
• 4.3 Service Delivery Platforms
  • 4.3.1 Purpose of SDPs
  • 4.3.2 Types of SDP Solutions
  • 4.3.3 Interworking Between Service Infrastructures
  • 4.3.4 Pros and Cons of SOA and SDPs
• 4.4 Converged Applications Platform
• 4.5 The Emergence of IPTV and Convergence Standards
• 4.6 Overview of IMS
  • 4.6.1 Why IMS?
  • 4.6.2 Services Enabled By IMS
  • 4.6.3 Standards View of IMS
  • 4.6.4 IMS Architecture
• 4.7 TeleManagement Forum

5. CapEx Events Along the Route to Convergence

6. Service Provider Views of Convergence

• 6.1 Deutsche Telekom (Germany)
  • 6.1.1 T-Home (Germany) Background
  • 6.1.2 T-Home Competitive Advantages
  • 6.1.3 T-Home Infrastructure
  • 6.1.4 T-Home Service Roadmap
  • 6.1.5 Additional T-Home Service Expectations
• 6.2 British Telecom - BT Vision
• 6.3 France Telecom - Orange IPTV
• 6.4 TeliaSonera - Telia Digital TV
• 6.5 Other IPTV Operators Proceeding with Multi-Service Convergence
  • 6.5.1 AT&T
  • 6.5.2 Additional Operators with IMS Deployments and IPTV

7. Analysis: Opportunities, Risks, Benefits & Costs

• 7.1 General Conclusions Regarding Convergence
• 7.2 Comparative Analysis of Convergence-Enabling Technologies
  • 7.2.1 Comparing IPTV Middleware Approaches to Convergence
  • 7.2.2 Comparing the Two TISPAN IMS Architectures
  • 7.2.3 Comparing IPTV Middleware to IPTV-Enabled IMS Approaches
• 7.3 Convergence Impact on Revenue
  • 7.3.1 Revenue and Margin Benefits of Convergence
• 7.4 Convergence Impact on Operating Expenses
  • 7.4.1 IMS Impact on Operating Expenses
  • 7.4.2 Customer Loyalty Due to Bundled Services
  • 7.4.3 Subscriber Acquisition Costs Attributable to Marketing
  • 7.4.4 Additional Acquisition Costs Associated with CPE
  • 7.4.5 Other Trends in OpEx Reduction Stemming From Convergence
• 7.5 Broad Industry Trends Relevant to Convergence
  • 7.5.1 Increasing Demand for Convergence
  • 7.5.2 IPTV Services Evolution
  • 7.5.3 Industry Growth Trend
• 7.6 Network Trends
  • 7.6.1 Proliferation of Access Further Justifies Converged Network Architecture
  • 7.6.2 Infrastructure Trends
  • 7.6.3 Fixed-Mobile Convergence
  • 7.6.4 Adoption Rate of IMS
  • 7.6.5 Integration of Advertising, IPTV and Business Support Systems
  • 7.6.6 Convergence and Content Work-Flow
• 7.7 Converged Feature Trends
  • 7.7.1 Evolution of Content-Based Services
  • 7.7.2 Use of Telephony Features in a Home TV Environment
  • 7.7.3 Additional Expectations
• 7.8 Opportunities
  • 7.8.1 New Consumer Services, Features and Use-Cases
  • 7.8.2 Early Returns Are In: Converged IPTV Applications Sell
  • 7.8.3 New Revenue From Sources Other Than From Consumers
  • 7.8.4 Savings in Operational Expenditures
  • 7.8.5 Savings in Capital Expenditures
• 7.9 Issues, Risks & Threats Associated with Convergence
  • 7.9.1 Converged Services Invite Renewed Scrutiny of Basic Service
  • 7.9.2 IMS Remains Risky, But Applications, SOA and SDPs Lay the Foundation For It
  • 7.9.3 Shifting the Burden of Responsibility for Applications
  • 7.9.4 Multiple Standards and APIs May Invite Confusion
  • 7.9.5 Evolution and Migration of Enabling Protocol
  • 7.9.6 Organizational Efficiency
  • 7.9.7 Content Entitlements
  • 7.9.8 Resource Redundancy
• 7.10 Societal Implications of Convergence
  • 7.10.1 How Can Operators Test New Use-Cases?
  • 7.10.2 How Far is “Too Far”?

8. Conclusions and Recommendations

• 8.1 Conclusion: The Converged Lifestyle is Real
• 8.2 Conclusion: Convergence Represents a 180-degree Shift in How Operators Must Think
• 8.3 Conclusion: Convergence Places New Emphasis on Integration and Integration-Friendly Technologies
• 8.4 Conclusion: Converged Delivery Will Ultimately Involve IMS
• 8.5 Recommendation: Service Evolution Toward Convergence
• 8.6 Recommendation: Planning for Convergence
  • 8.6.1 Technology Planning Recommendations for Convergence
  • 8.6.2 Shorter-Term Planning
  • 8.6.3 Medium-Range Planning
  • 8.6.4 Longer-Range Planning
• 8.7 Recommendation: Strategic Considerations for Integrating IPTV and IMS
  • 8.7.1 Protocol Harmonization
  • 8.7.2 Common Network Resource Control
  • 8.7.3 Common Subscriber Management
• 8.8 Recommendation: Converged Solutions Don' t Have to be Implemented Over IMS in the Short-Term
  • 8.8.1 Different Reasons to Advocate Different Converged Implementations
  • 8.8.2 Are IMS Platform Suppliers Biased?
• 8.9 Recommendation: Market Imperatives Should Outweigh the Need for Technical Perfection
• 8.10 Recommendation: Creates Awareness to Create User Demand
  • 8.10.1 Creating Consumer Awareness
  • 8.10.2 Creating Consumer Demand
• 8.11 Recommendation: Recognize Market Forces
• 8.12 Recommendation: Don' t Lose Sight of the Basic Questions

9. Appendix 1: Company Profiles

• 9.1 Alcatel-Lucent
  • 9.1.1 Introduction
  • 9.1.2 Alcatel-Lucent IPTV Market Focus
  • 9.1.3 Alcatel-Lucent Convergence Product Overview
  • 9.1.4 Alcatel-Lucent Middleware and TV Applications Overview
  • 9.1.5 Alcatel-Lucent MiViewTV
  • 9.1.6 Alcatel-Lucent MiViewTV Convergence Support
  • 9.1.7 Additional Alcatel-Lucent IPTV Applications Products
  • 9.1.8 Alcatel-Lucent 5910 MiTV Mobile Interactive TV Platform
  • 9.1.9 Alcatel-Lucent 5930 Interactive Media Manager
  • 9.1.10 Alcatel-Lucent Triple-Play Service Delivery Architecture (TPSDA)
  • 9.1.11 Alcatel-Lucent TPSDA Service Orchestration and Delivery
  • 9.1.12 Alcatel-Lucent Approach to Migrate Operators to Convergence
  • 9.1.13 Alcatel-Lucent IMS
• 9.2 Cisco Systems
  • 9.2.1 Introduction
  • 9.2.2 Cisco Systems Market Focus
  • 9.2.3 Cisco Systems IPTV and Convergence Approach
  • 9.2.4 Cisco Video Quality Products
  • 9.2.5 Cisco Service Exchange Framework
  • 9.2.6 Cisco Converged IP NGN Architecture
• 9.3 Ericsson
  • 9.3.1 Introduction
  • 9.3.2 Ericsson Situation and Customers
  • 9.3.3 Product Philosophy and Approach
  • 9.3.4 Product Unit Overview
  • 9.3.5 Ericsson IMS
• 9.4 Hewlett-Packard Company
  • 9.4.1 Company Summary
  • 9.4.2 Introduction
  • 9.4.3 Hewlett-Packard Situation and Customers
  • 9.4.4 Products, Philosophy and Approach
  • 9.4.5 Hewlett-Packard IPTV Initiatives
  • 9.4.6 Hewlett-Packard IMS
• 9.5 IBM
  • 9.5.1 Introduction
  • 9.5.1 IBM Approach to Integrating Convergence
• 9.6 Kudelski Group (Quative IPTV Service Delivery Platform)
  • 9.6.1 Introduction
  • 9.6.2 Quative Marketing Strategies and Value Proposition
  • 9.6.3 Quative IPTV Product Philosophy
  • 9.6.4 Quative Platform Product Line
  • 9.6.5 Quative TV Service Delivery Platform Overview
  • 9.6.6 Quative Convergence Support
  • 9.6.7 Quative Set-top Box Support
  • 9.6.8 Quative Reference Application Suite
  • 9.6.9 Third-Party Product Partnerships
  • 9.6.10 Product Roadmap
• 9.7 Microsoft
  • 9.7.1 Introduction
  • 9.7.2 Microsoft IPTV Marketing Focus and Customers
  • 9.7.3 Microsoft Product Philosophy
  • 9.7.4 Microsoft Mediaroom IPTV Platform
  • 9.7.5 Microsoft IPTV Developer Tools
  • 9.7.6 Applications Enabled by Microsoft Mediaroom
  • 9.7.7 Convergence Functionality in Microsoft Mediaroom
  • 9.7.8 Microsoft Connected Services Framework SDP
• 9.8 Nokia Siemens Networks
  • 9.8.1 Introduction
  • 9.8.2 Nokia Siemens Networks IPTV Market Focus and Customers
  • 9.8.3 Nokia Siemens Networks SURPASS Home Entertainment Platform
  • 9.8.4 NSN Convergence Support
  • 9.8.5 NSN Myrio Design Studio
  • 9.8.6 Nokia Siemens Networks IMS
• 9.9 Nortel Networks
  • 9.9.1 Introduction
  • 9.9.2 Marketing and Value Proposition
  • 9.9.3 Product Philosophy
  • 9.9.4 Nortel Networks IPTV Products
  • 9.9.5 Nortel Networks IMS Products
• 9.10 Thomson
  • 9.10.1 Introduction
  • 9.10.2 Thomson Marketing and Value Proposition
  • 9.10.3 Thomson Overall IPTV Product Line
  • 9.10.4 Thomson SmartVision TV Platform
  • 9.10.5 Thomson Convergence Support
  • 9.10.6 SmartVision TV Product Roadmap
• 9.11 UTStarcom
  • 9.11.1 Introduction
  • 9.11.2 UTStarcom Marketing and Value Proposition
  • 9.11.3 UTStarcom Product Line
  • 9.11.4 UTStarcom RollingStream IPTV Platform
  • 9.11.5 UTStarcom Convergence Support

10. Appendix 2: ITU-T NGN Standards

11. Appendix 3: Review of IPTV and IPTV-Enabled IMS Standards

• 11.1 3GPP
• 11.2 ETSI NGN Project
• 11.3 ETSI TISPAN IPTV-Enabled IMS
  • 11.3.1 ETSI TS 182-027 - IPTV Architecture
  • 11.3.2 ETSI TS 182-028 - IPTV “Release 2” Architecture
• 11.4 Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) IPTV Standards
• 11.5 International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T) IPTV & IPTV-Enabled IMS Standards
  • 11.5.1 Overall ITU-T IPTV FG Functional Model
  • 11.5.2 Architectural Variations Based on the ITU-T IPTV FG Functional Model
  • 11.5.3 Major Sources of the ITV-T IPTV FG Standards
• 11.6 Open IPTV Forum IPTV-Enabled IMS

12. Index of Companies

• Figure 1-1: Consumers Increasingly Expect a Seamless Experience
• Figure 1-2: Video and Multiple Data Sources to a TV
• Figure 1-3: Video Enriched with Other Content, on a Mobile Device
• Figure 1-4: The Needs of Evolving Consumer Segments
• Figure 1-5: Platform View of Convergence
• Figure 1-6: Multi-Silo Language Translation
• Figure 1-7: Anticipated Changes in Telecommunications Business Models
• Figure 1-8: Key Drivers of the Future Value of Telecommunications
• Figure 3-1: LommelTV (Belgium)
• Figure 3-2: Caller-ID Presented to the TV
• Figure 3-3: Location-Based Targeted Advertising
• Figure 3-4: Internet Content on TV
• Figure 3-5: Convergence as a Catalyst to Enable Content as a Service
• Figure 3-6: Multi-Encoded Content Distribution in the Digital Home
• Figure 3-7: Increase in Ad Revenue Aligns with Rise of On-Demand Subs
• Figure 3-8: Expectations are High for Mobile Video & Entertainment
• Figure 3-9: Transition to Transaction-Based Advertising
• Figure 3-10: Advertising Industry Trends
• Figure 3-11: Expanded Ad Revenue Opportunities Through Convergence
• Figure 4-1: Convergence and How it is Controlled - Using the OSI Stack
• Figure 4-2: Integra5 Communications Features on TV
• Figure 4-3: Integra5 Multi-Service Architecture
• Figure 4-4: ETI Triad Platform for Provisioning of Multiple Converged Services
• Figure 4-5: High-Level Diagram of 3GPP IMS Architecture
• Figure 4-6: Architectural View of Convergence
• Figure 6-1: Screen Shot of T-Home Video Archive of Football (Soccer) Matches Arranged By Day
• Figure 6-2: T-Home Video Archive of Matches Arranged By Team
• Figure 6-3: UK Market Situation
• Figure 6-4: BT Vision Value Proposition
• Figure 6-5: BT Vision Interactive TV Feature
• Figure 6-6: BT Vision Recommendation Feature
• Figure 6-7: BT Vision Premium TV and VOD
• Figure 6-8: Orange (France Telecom) Multi-Platform IPTV Services Range
• Figure 6-9: Orange IPTV Pricing and Packaging
• Figure 6-10: TeliaSonera Schematic for the Digital Home
• Figure 6-11: TeliaSonera Integration of IPTV and Internet Video
• Figure 7-1: FMC ARPU and Margins Reported by MSOs
• Figure 7-2: Millennial Users Drive New Patterns of Communications
• Figure 7-3: Evolution of IPTV Toward Convergence
• Figure 7-4: Network Traffic Growth Driven By TV, Video and Internet
• Figure 7-5: Global IPTV Subscriber Forecast
• Figure 7-6: Evolution of Fixed and Wireless Networks
• Figure 7-7: Parallel Evolution of Networks to Accommodate Rich Media & Convergence
• Figure 7-8: Bandwidth Requirements of the Converged Digital Home
• Figure 8-1: A Story of the Converged Lifestyle
• Figure 8-2: A Story of the Converged Lifestyle - Continued
• Figure 8-3: Services Migration from IPTV to Convergence
• Figure 8-4: Evolution of Access Networks to Accommodate Convergence
• Figure 8-5: Multi-Silo Language Translation
• Figure 8-6: Five Forces Model for Competitive Strategy
• Figure 9-1: Screen Captures of Alcatel-Lucent MiViewTV User Interface
• Figure 9-2: Alcatel-Lucent Remote PVR Application
• Figure 9-3: Alcatel-Lucent SIP/IMS-Based Video Conferencing
• Figure 9-4: Alcatel-Lucent 5930 Interactive Media Manager
• Figure 9-5: Alcatel-Lucent Triple-Play Service Orchestration & Delivery
• Figure 9-6: Alcatel-Lucent Multi-Service Delivery Migration Roadmap
• Figure 9-7: Cisco Admission Control On-Path Signaling
• Figure 9-8: Cisco Access Link Off-Path Admission Control
• Figure 9-9: Cisco Service Exchange Framework
• Figure 9-10: Cisco Service Exchange Framework is Implemented within the Cisco NGN Architecture
• Figure 9-11: Ericsson Product Units
• Figure 9-12: Hewlett-Packard Offering for IPTV Operators
• Figure 9-13: IBM SDP Service Life-Cycle Approach
• Figure 9-14: IBM Service Provider Delivery Environment (SPDE)
• Figure 9-15: Kudelski Group Strategic Focus and Product Lines
• Figure 9-16: Quative Solutions Vision
• Figure 9-17: High-Level Schematic Diagram of Quative Service Delivery Platform
• Figure 9-18: Quative Telco Deployment Architecture
• Figure 9-19: Quative Support for Traditional and Abstracted Set-top Boxes Models
• Figure 9-20: Interactive Program Guide - Quative Standard User Interface
• Figure 9-21: Quative NagraGuide Screenshots
• Figure 9-22: Quative SDP with Lysis Content Management System
• Figure 9-23: Microsoft TV IPTV Edition - Live TV with Channel Bar and PiP
• Figure 9-24: Microsoft Mediaroom Interactive Demonstration of CNN and Content
• Figure 9-25: Microsoft Mediaroom Caller-ID on TV
• Figure 9-26: Microsoft Mediaroom Text Chat on TV
• Figure 9-27: Microsoft Xbox 360 Value Proposition with IPTV
• Figure 9-28: Diagram of Microsoft Connected Services Framework (CSF)
• Figure 9-29: Nokia Siemens Networks End-to-End Converged Platform Environment
• Figure 9-30: Nokia Siemens Networks SURPASS Platform
• Figure 9-31: NSN SURPASS Home Entertainment User Interface Examples
• Figure 9-32: NSN IPTV Interactive Program Guide at Belgacom
• Figure 9-33: Nokia Siemens Networks Interactive Applications
• Figure 9-34: Nortel Networks VSP 9500 High-Level Architecture
• Figure 9-35: Nortel Networks CM 9520 Application Module
• Figure 9-36: Nortel Networks IMS Architecture
• Figure 9-37: Thomson Product Lines for End-to-End Triple-Play IP Services
• Figure 9-38: Thomson Grass Valley IPTV Headend
• Figure 9-39: High-Level Schematic Diagram of Thomson SmartVision Platform
• Figure 9-40: Thomson SmartVision End-to-End Features and Applications
• Figure 9-41: Thomson SmartVision TV Program Guide, VOD Menu and Parental Controls
• Figure 9-42: Screen Captures of Thomson SmartVision TV Convergence Features
• Figure 9-43: Screen Captures of Thomson SmartVision TV Mobile Video Features
• Figure 9-44: Thomson SmartVision Strategic Roadmap
• Figure 9-45: Market Sectors Pursued by UTStarcom
• Figure 9-46: UTStarcom RollingStream Platform Elements
• Figure 9-47: UTStarcom RollingStream Platform in a Large Tiered Deployment
• Figure 9-48: Screen Captures of UTStarcom RollingStream Subscriber UI
• Figure 9-49: UTStarcom RollingStream TV Menu and Ticker Screen-Shots
• Figure 9-50: Hierarchical Content Distribution by UTStarcom RollingStream
• Figure 10-1: ITU-T NGN Standards Contributors
• Figure 11-1: TISPAN Diagram of the NGN (Next Generation Network)
• Figure 11-2: IPTV in IMS NGN per TS 182 027 Specification
• Figure 11-3: IPTV in IMS NGN per TS 182 028 Specification
• Figure 11-4: ATIS IPTV Domains (ATIS 0800002)
• Figure 11-5: Functions of IPTV Domains in the ATIS IPTV Architecture
• Figure 11-6: ATIS NGN Architecture with IPTV Service Components
• Figure 11-7: ITU-T IPTV Functional Architecture
• Figure 11-8: ITU-T IPTV FG Non-NGN IPTV Architecture
• Figure 11-9: NGN-Based IPTV Architecture (Without IMS)
• Figure 11-10: NGN-Based IPTV Architecture (With IMS)
• Figure 11-11: Open IPTV Forum IPTV Value Chain

• Table 3-1: Converged Personal Communications Features
• Table 3-2: Time-, Place- and Device-Shifting of TV Features
• Table 3-3: Content-Shifting in a Converged Services Environment
• Table 3-4: Socially-Enabled Converged Use-Cases
• Table 3-5: User Self-Personalization in a Converged Environment
• Table 4-1: IPTV & Convergence
• Table 5-1: Impact of Convergence Features on IPTV System Components
• Table 10-1: NGN Standardization Efforts within the ITU-T

• 2Wire
• 3GPP
• Accenture
• Akimbo
• Alcatel-Lucent
• Aliant
• Amazon
• Amino
• ANT
• Apple
• ARRIS
• AT&T
• ATIS
• B.net
• BearingPoint
• Beijing Netcom
• Belgacom
• Bell Canada
• Bharti
• Brasil Telecom
• BSNL
• BT
• Cable Labs
• Cap Gemini
• China Mobile
• China Netcom
• China Telecom
• Chunghwa Telecom
• Cingular
• Cisco (Scientific-Atlanta)
• Club Internet
• CMLA
• Comporium Communications
• Consolidated Communications
• Consumer Electronics Association
• CORAL Consortium
• Deutsche Telekom
• Dialog Telecom
• DirecTV
• Dish Network (EchoStar Communications)
• DLNA
• DSL Forum
• Du
• DVB
• eBay
• EDS
• EMC
• Entone Technologies
• Ericsson/Tandberg
• España
• Espial
• ETI
• Etisalat
• ETSI
• FASTWEB
• Femto Forum
• Foothills Telephone Cooperative
• France Telecom
• Free
• Fujitsu
• Funai Electric Co.
• Google
• Hargray Communications
• Harmonic
• Harris Corporation
• Hewlett-Packard
• HGI
• Huawei Technologies
• IBM
• Iliad
• Industria
• Integra5
• Iowa Network Services
• Irdeto
• ITU-T
• JDSU
• Kasenna
• KPN
• Kudelski Group
• KyLin TV
• LG Electronics
• Lysis
• Magyar Telekom
• Mauritius Telecom Group
• Microsoft
• Minerva Networks
• MoCA
• Mostelekom
• Motorola
• MTNL
• MTS Allstream
• MTS Russia
• Myrio
• Nagravision
• NBC Universal
• NDS
• NEC
• Neuf Cegetel
• Nokia Siemens Networks
• Nortel Networks
• NRK
• nTelos
• NTT
• Numbericable
• OMA
• Open IPTV Forum
• Open Mobile Alliance
• OpenTV
• Orcale
• Orca Interactive
• Oregan Networks
• Panasonic
• Panhandle Telephone
• Parlay Group
• Philips
• Pioneer Telephone
• Portugal Telecom
• Quative
• Reliance Communications
• Revver
• Sagem Communications
• Samsung
• SaskTel
• SES-Americom
• SES-Astra
• Shanghai Media Group
• Sharp Corporation
• Shenick Network Systems
• Sigma Designs
• Siminn
• SingTel
• Slovak Telecom
• Slovenia Online
• SmarDTV
• Softbank
• Sonatel
• Sony Corporation
• Sprint Nextel
• STMicroelectronics
• Sun Microsystems
• Swisscom
• Symmetricom
• Tandberg Television
• T-Com
• Telecom Italia
• Tele-Denmark Communications
• Telefonica
• Telemanagement Forum
• TeliaSonera
• Telkom South Africa
• Telus
• Thomson
• Tilgin
• TISPAN
• TM Fourm
• Toshiba
• UPNP
• UTStarcom
• Verimatrix
• Verizon Communications
• Viaccess
• Vodafone
• Vonage
• Widevine Technologies
• Wind
• Yahoo
• Zignal
• ZTE